Thread: E85 debate
View Single Post
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2007, 12:16 AM
litesong litesong is offline
Member
iTrader: (0)
  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Monroe, Washington
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 0
litesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these parts
dank24...My Washington State produces equivalent electric energy power to gas engines with only 4% of the pollution of Internal Combustion Engines(ICE). I hate coal, but even centralized coal fired electric energy production is less polluting than individual ICE (any centralized energy production is better than individual energy sources), & those coal fired production centers are not in the middle of cities killing kids w/pollution like ICEs are.

Transfer of electric power through power lines is more efficient than the transfer to gas stations of gas via tanker trucks.

Electric motors are 4 times more efficient than ICE.

Chuck bio-fuels which is an idea to extend the live of ICE.

Long live electric engines once electric energy density storage is improved. May ICE soon die...& kids live.

P.S....E85 pollutions study by Prof. Mark Jacobsen. Details for April 18, 2007 on Green Car Congress.
Last edited by litesong; 07-18-2007 at 05:10 PM.
Reply With Quote