View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2006, 03:47 PM
bsgump bsgump is offline
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 0
bsgump will become famous soon enough
Thumbs down 1996 Civic HX got better MPG

The 1996 Honda Civic HX was getting high miles per gallon with:

CVT 34 city / 38 hwy

5MT 35 city / 43 hwy



AND THAT WAS 10 YEARS AGO!



The Fit over seas in US MPG’s gets about 35 city / 50 hwy. But the US Fit is getting only 33/38. EVEN with the added weight the MPG should be close to what it is getting over seas. It should be close to 32 city / 47 hwy with the added weight for the US model, and with the advancement in engine technology that Honda has made, the MPG should be even a little higher like 32 – 35 city / 47 – 50 hwy.



This is a big let down to all the people that care a lot about fuel economy with the growing concern of higher gas prices. Not to mention that people have been waiting and following the news for the Fit for a long time since it was announced. Their anticipation grew eagerly as the launch date for unveiling the fit became closer and closer. Since Honda kept the specs a secret while people were expecting much more, it is a giant let down. I know several people who had their hearts set on buying a Fit for sure, are now definitely not buying a Fit. They plan on waiting to see if Honda Comes out with a different Fit model that is more fuel efficient like it should be, otherwise they plan on buying something else.


Can you please give a, very good, valid reason for lowering the fuel economy.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links