View Single Post
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2008, 12:34 AM
jdjohnson9's Avatar
jdjohnson9 jdjohnson9 is offline
Avid FitFreak Poster
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Unknown
Posts: 2,300
Rep Power: 74
jdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to livejdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to livejdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to livejdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to livejdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to livejdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to livejdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to livejdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to livejdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to livejdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to livejdjohnson9 relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by doctordoom View Post
haha that's the complete opposite of the way i think but both make perfect sense to me.

the way i see it is to try improve on the car's strengths (suspension/handling) by first changing its springs instead of dilly-dallying with its weaknesses. and it's a plus that springs give the car a more aggressive appearance in the process.
Haha. I did the same thing. Got springs and tweaked the suspension first and then went to an intake and exhaust after. Springs give the car such a better stance and are way more noticable then an intake imo. Springs all the way. Good luck with the skunk2's. I love mine.
__________________
Joshua

Gone but not forgoten:
2007 MR Sport M/T (Ruby)
2008 NHBP Sport Auto (ex wifey's)

New in town:
2008 Nimbus Grey Metallic, Ridgeline RTL

Last edited by jdjohnson9; 01-26-2008 at 12:35 AM. Reason: Im an idiot
Reply With Quote