View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 09:53 PM
cavie187's Avatar
cavie187 cavie187 is offline
Avid FitFreak Poster
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,295
Rep Power: 128
cavie187 relies on Rep Points to livecavie187 relies on Rep Points to livecavie187 relies on Rep Points to livecavie187 relies on Rep Points to livecavie187 relies on Rep Points to livecavie187 relies on Rep Points to livecavie187 relies on Rep Points to livecavie187 relies on Rep Points to livecavie187 relies on Rep Points to livecavie187 relies on Rep Points to livecavie187 relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by ldweng View Post
I guessed it had to do with the resonant frequency being different from the stock header.
That's the only other explanation i can think of. I doubted the header was more restrictive, but the only other option was that the resonance was low enough to dissipate in the exhaust system itself. Meaning that the exhaust piping was large enough to displace most of the sound before exiting the muffler. In most cases the decrease in back pressure and increase in flow will cancel out the difference in resonance by way of volume and push more sound though.

so I say again.. does anyone have a before and after dyno result of JUST the header as the altered variable? Flow tests will mean nothing if the stock exhaust manifold is doing a "more than sufficient" job.
__________________

**Name = Dave**
Last Stop For Exhaust Clips!!!! Videos Inside <--Click me!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by kelsodeez View Post
haha yea dude ive taken out four airbags in my car and i say turning off your car while you are rolling is too unsafe.
Reply With Quote