View Single Post
  #184 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 02:46 PM
pcs0snq's Avatar
pcs0snq pcs0snq is offline
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: lake worth FL
Posts: 1,013
Rep Power: 71613
pcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unforgiven View Post
Not sure if any of you watch Mythbusters (cool show) but they did an episode on A/C vs. Windows down:

Tests were performed under varying conditions (55 mph versus 45 mph). The 55 mph test used a computer to estimate fuel efficiency based on air intake, not actual fuel consumption, and showed A/C was more efficient. The 45 mph test consisted of running the tank until it was empty, and showed open windows were more efficient. *Because the original tests were inconclusive, this "urban puzzle" was revisited in episode 38: It is more fuel efficient to use air conditioning when the car is traveling approximately 50mph or more. Otherwise, windows are more fuel efficient.
That's been proven to not be true for a Fit. Perhaps because of the 109hp engine.

From test results
windows don't make much matter at 55 or less
A/C sucks gas like crazy. At least 3mpg decrease min
__________________
Paul
2008 VBP Fit Sport Man 5 spd trans

208US Gal saved in the last 20,000miles
Reply With Quote