General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

Long (!) review of automatic vs. manual Fit Sport (US)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #41  
schmeitung's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
From: Santa Fe, NM, USA
Put me in the category of "unreformable" MT driver as well. Now, if I could only teach the wife to drive the damn thing...
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 05:54 PM
  #42  
Squid's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 53
From: California
Originally Posted by Wessy
...so I'm still on the fence, and hoping to hear more encouraging real-world fuel economy reports from the fast-growing ranks of paddle-shifting FitFreaks out there.
My first experiment with "paddle only" driving has yielded a disappointing 25.9 mpg. Granted, that's only a 1/2 tank measurement. I'll experiment more later.

https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/show...?t=3990&page=2

When I moved to CA from FL, I went from getting 26 mpg in my '03 Solara to 18 mpg. My Odyssey went from 22 to 16. At first I thought the fuel was treated with something special in CA that hurts gas mileage, but then I realized...Florida's flat, San Diego (at least the area where I live and work) is very hilly. Maybe the terrain is affecting my mpg in the Fit, too.

It is a lot more fun driving by paddle, though.
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 06:02 PM
  #43  
peepod's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 19
From: USA
Thanks for the thoughtful review. Greatly appreciated.
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 11:58 PM
  #44  
plus_c's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 161
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by Squid
Florida's flat, San Diego (at least the area where I live and work) is very hilly. Maybe the terrain is affecting my mpg in the Fit, too.
Would make sense - going uphill means you're keeping your engine higher in the rev range, which has a negative effect on fuel economy. EPA estimates assume flat ground, don't they?
 
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 05:03 AM
  #45  
BKKJack's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
From: NOVA
I just spent the last three days driving a renting CVT iDSI around Bangkok. It was fun, but weird. In full auto mode, the engine hits a certain rpm to provide the acceleration you want, and then just stays there while the car gathers speed. E.g. I was accelerating moderately from a stop, and from virtually 0 to about 80 kph, the tach needle was basically stuck on 3,000.

If you hit the seven speed mode button, but don't use the paddle shifters, the transmission shifts through the seven gears more like a modern automatic. Once you hit the paddle shifters, you are more or less in control, but the car still retains veto power. If you bounce it off the rev limiter in first, it will shift to third. It will downshift for you, if you forget, and will let you start from a stop in either first or second, but nothing higher. It also will not let you shift into a gear it deems inappropriate. I was basically coasting down a street at about 35 mph, and it wouldn't let me shift any higher than 5th.

The shift buttons are on the front of the steering wheel, at 3 and 9, and have up and down functions on both sides. I didn't like the placement. It might work on a F1 car, but it makes it difficult to actuate the shifters while turning. Besides a DSG, it might be one of the better alternatives to a real manual, but for my money, manuals are still the ticket.

It would take some serious time in this car to get used to how this powertrain works. I am not sure if it is all the CVTnicks claim it is. I know this really isn't relevant to the NA market. I just thought you might like a little impression of what you may or may not be missing.
 
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 05:07 AM
  #46  
BKKJack's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
From: NOVA
I forgot to mention, I saw an indicated 170 kph on the expressway. That from a supposedly weaker iDSI engine.
 
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 11:34 AM
  #47  
Karyn's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 71
From: USA
I am really loving the AT in the Fit Sport. I spent the night driving around in it last night. I love the paddles, I think I want to be a race car driver now . This is one peppy little car. It also shifts great in regular "Drive" mode.
 
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #48  
dancingsun's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 232
From: Diamond Bar, CA, USA
Originally Posted by BKKJack
The shift buttons are on the front of the steering wheel, at 3 and 9, and have up and down functions on both sides. I didn't like the placement. It might work on a F1 car, but it makes it difficult to actuate the shifters while turning.
I thought the F1 race cars have paddle shifters and not shift buttons? Did they change it?

Anyway a CVT is able to maintain the RPM of the engine at it the point where it generates its peak torque, therefore, you won't see any RPM changes as you throttle up and down. Which is probably why the transmission is married with the i-DSI engine instead of the VTEC, which can generate fairly good torque across the tach range. Basically, it makes more sense to use CVT if you have an engine that can produce peak torque at an easily-reachable RPM ( the i-DSI engine's torque peaks at around 2700) and where it's power band looks more like an arch (1 apex, lower torque everywhere else).

Essentially, using the CVT, you'll drive at the engine's peak efficiency at all times. It may not feel like it, since the car does not jerk when you accelerate, but the overall acceleration is more constant and thus should win out against the same car with regular (manual and automatic) transmission. But this also means when you're using the 7 "virtual" gears mode, you're not running at maximum efficiency of the engine.

CVTs do not use torque converters as well, so that adds to their efficiency and fuel economy. But since all the i-DSI engines are sub-100 horsepower, and the perceived performance isn't as evident as normal transmissions, it's likely that Honda decided that these technologies won't sell in the NA market.
 

Last edited by dancingsun; Apr 29, 2006 at 03:47 PM.
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 11:01 PM
  #49  
Occidio's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 70
From: Canada
F1 used to be paddle shifters in the 90's but they changed over to buttons by the late 90's.
 
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 11:38 PM
  #50  
mauicedar's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 38
From: USA
Originally Posted by Paulo107
automatic are great and all, but maybe for cars with bigger engines...to each' s own but i prefer 5spd like what i have
Since Formula 1 has eliminated manual gearshifts in their racecars you might rethink that position.
 
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:53 AM
  #51  
DRum's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 451
From: South Dakota
How would Formula 1 affect a persons preference to drive a stickshift?
 
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:24 AM
  #52  
plus_c's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 161
From: Philadelphia
I thought F1 shifters were SMGs, not full auto transmissions...
 
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 05:45 AM
  #53  
MaceP's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1
From: New Zealand
I live in New Zealand and own a 2002 1.5 v-tec Fit with the AT. (7 speed paddle option) What a blast to drive. I average 45+ (NZ MPG) with a mixture of town & open road running. If I was you Wessy I get the Auto. Those V-Tecs just love to rev and they're great on the hills.
 
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 06:12 PM
  #54  
johnson@crocker.com's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 44
From: colrain ma usa
first 2 tank fulls

Our first tankfull was 45.7 mpg (US) the second was 45.2 mpg- so ths fit can get great mileage first tank was mostly back roads, second was 50% highway (55mph tops) 50% in town Boston driving around with a different driver.
 
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 11:27 PM
  #55  
BKKJack's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
From: NOVA
My reference to F1 cars was related to the steering ratio of those cars. They have maybe one full turn lock-to-lock, and therefore, the drivers never take their hands off the wheel to turn. With the Fit, or most road cars, you have to move your hands around the wheel to turn, and might not have not have your hands in the proper place to hit the appropriate button or paddle should you need to shift. With a true manual, the shifter is always on the floor, right where you left it, and it is easily found whether you are turning or going straight ahead.

I am not sure what exact type of transmissions F1 cars use, but I do know they are highly computerized and preprogrammed with shift points for each track, based on the prerace practice and qualifying sessions. The transmissions, along with just about everything else in the car is monitored, and adjustable by the driver, and/or the team sitting in the pits. I think an F1 race is probably more like a NASA shuttle mission than me hopping in my car to pick up a sixxer, and wasn't trying to compare the transmissions, just the location of the driver interface with the transmission
 
Old May 1, 2006 | 02:42 PM
  #56  
Toeside's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
From: Marietta, Georgia
Not that we're going just a little off-topic here, but according to forumla1.com and f1technical.net, most of today's F1 cars use seven-speed semi-automatic gearboxes which are actuated via paddles fitted behind the steering wheel.

In these cars, pulling the left paddle shifts down, while pulling the right paddle shifts up. Deloading of the transmission during shifts is controlled electronically, and shift times are measured in milliseconds.

It's worth getting up at, say, 3am on Sunday to tune-in to F1 racing on Speed. Pay close attention to the driver's hands during one of the on-board cockpit shots... you can see their hands twitch when they're shifting.

http://www.formula1.com/insight/tech...fo/11/467.html
http://www.f1technical.net/articles/30
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/sequential-gearbox2.htm
http://www.speedtv.com/programs/28/
 

Last edited by Toeside; May 1, 2006 at 10:27 PM.
Old May 1, 2006 | 10:16 PM
  #57  
OrangeBlossom's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 45
From: Washington, D.C.
Cool Getting more poop when you need it with automatic

I have found the best way to get more oomph from the little engine that could is to use the left paddle shifter on my Sport AT. It drops down a gear for each pull on the paddle and enables a dramatic increase in power when you need it. It's much better and faster than tromping on the pedal. I'm no stranger to paddle shifters. My Mazda RX-8, the non-family car, despite the four doors, has an automatic tranny and outstanding paddle shifters. Would not be surprised though to find that the zero to twenty times for the Fit might actually be better than my Mazda RX-8. Hard to believe that the speedo on the Fit goes to 140 MPH. Maybe with a J-79 in afterburner mode.
 
Old May 1, 2006 | 10:37 PM
  #58  
BKKJack's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
From: NOVA
Originally Posted by Toeside
It's worth getting up at, say, 3am on Sunday to tune-in to F1 racing on Speed. Pay close attention to the driver's hands during one of the on-board cockpit shots... you can see their hands twitch when they're shifting.
Apologies for continuing off topic, but if you lived in Bangkok, all the European rounds would be on Sunday in PRIME TIME! WHOOO HOOOO
 
Old May 2, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #59  
Edwood's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 173
From: USA
Does the Base Model AT for the US Fit have paddle shifters? Or is it only for the Sport model?

-Ed
 
Old May 2, 2006 | 01:02 AM
  #60  
BKKJack's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
From: NOVA
Sport model only.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 PM.