View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2009, 11:01 PM
wdb's Avatar
wdb wdb is offline
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 747
Rep Power: 240235
wdb relies on Rep Points to livewdb relies on Rep Points to livewdb relies on Rep Points to livewdb relies on Rep Points to livewdb relies on Rep Points to livewdb relies on Rep Points to livewdb relies on Rep Points to livewdb relies on Rep Points to livewdb relies on Rep Points to livewdb relies on Rep Points to livewdb relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Coyote View Post
There was a guy a while back that used a scan gauge on his car and reported a difference in timing advance using premium fuel opposed to regular on the economy thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daemione View Post
AAaaah . . . now that's really interesting . . . Searching for the info now, not much luck yet. Just need to get my laptop up and running, and I'll be able to check it myself.

If, in fact, a fuel w/ an octane rating greater than 87 allows the ECU to advance timing more, the next question is: Does that actually equate to a more efficient engine? (and of course, is the difference significant enough to offset the increase in fuel price?) No easy way to test that w/out a dyno . . . Maybe an accelerometer like a G-tech is sensitive enough, I dunno.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Coyote View Post
The post was by DOHCtor on page 8 of "Octane 87 89 91 93 95" Eco FIT. He has all of the results of his findings and proved it to himself and a lot of others. Check it out.
Here's a link to the post. (Certain people should learn how to post links, ahem...)

Octane 87 89 91 93 95 ???????

Very interesting results indeed! I wonder what it all means though for steady state cruising, which is mostly what I do on my commute.
Reply With Quote