View Single Post
  #1184 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2009, 04:22 PM
pcs0snq's Avatar
pcs0snq pcs0snq is offline
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: lake worth FL
Posts: 1,013
Rep Power: 71613
pcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to livepcs0snq relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichXKU View Post
6th sounds great but what we really need is just a longer 5th. All they would do with a 6 speed is copy and paste the ratio for 5th to 6th, then make 2-5 shorter.

Honda is prioritizing peppy over MPG in the Fit, the 09s have an even shorter highway gearing than the 07-08.

--Begin real math--
07-08:
5th: 0.757
Final: 4.294
3.25 engine revs per axle rotation in 07-08

09:
5th: 0.727
Final: 4.62
3.36 engine revs per axle rotation in 09.

So the 09s are revving 3.3% higher than the 07-08, and get only 93.5% of the combined fuel economy of the 07-08
--End real math--

If I extrapolate, then the 2039 fit will probably get around 9 MPG and be at 7613 RPM on the highway.
Check the Sport trie size '08 to '09
__________________
Paul
2008 VBP Fit Sport Man 5 spd trans

208US Gal saved in the last 20,000miles
Reply With Quote