Off Topic DiscussionDiscuss anything that pleases you here.
Welcome to Fit Freak!
Welcome to Fit Freak,
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
Buy used. I did and haven't had any problems with my D60.
Wish I can learn to use flash like you guys do. Is there any cheap basic equipment that can introduce me into flash photography like that? I already have a SB600 FYI.
if you wanna go REALLY cheap. you can get Cactus triggers. or if you wanna spend a little more for better quality, get AB cybersyncs (which is what kyle has). These allow you to fire the flash off camera.
Buy used. I did and haven't had any problems with my D60.
Wish I can learn to use flash like you guys do. Is there any cheap basic equipment that can introduce me into flash photography like that? I already have a SB600 FYI.
Cactus v2's are dirt cheap, but they're a pain in the ass. Get the CyberSyncs
Yes I'll take my D40 over any other crop body camera alone for the sync speed. With my cybersyncsbi can sync my B800 up to 1/1500 of a second. ANY other camera can only do 1/200 - 1/300 tops.
You have to ask your self though, how many pics have you taken with flash so far that required 1/500? Not many probably. Portraiture, static auto shots, etc. very rarely even need 1/250 most of the time unless you're trying to shut out the sun, and even then you can pop on a 1-stop ND filter if it's really necessary. Too many benefits to a better body to hold out only for 1/500 sync.
__________________
'07 Vivid Blue Pearl Sport w/stuff attached in useful places
You have to ask your self though, how many pics have you taken with flash so far that required 1/500? Not many probably. Portraiture, static auto shots, etc. very rarely even need 1/250 most of the time unless you're trying to shut out the sun, and even then you can pop on a 1-stop ND filter if it's really necessary. Too many benefits to a better body to hold out only for 1/500 sync.
i agree, and if i were to buy a new camera today, the d3000 would be worth considering. but i sure as hell wouldn't upgrade to it from my d40.
i agree, and if i were to buy a new camera today, the d3000 would be worth considering. but i sure as hell wouldn't upgrade to it from my d40.
Yeah, it's not a big enough jump to warrant the outlay at that point.
Probably the best cost/performance value in Nikon right now, aside from the D700, is the D5000 -- same sensor as D90 and D300, very close to to D90 in specs, reasonably priced, and has the flip LCD which can be useful in some situations.
A bit higher up the ladder, I would expect the D300 to start dropping in price soon as the D300s starts hitting the shelves. Don't know if they'll blow it out like the Best Buy D200's a few months back, but you never know. That was a hell of a deal -- at one point they were under $500, for a $1600 camera only a year or so back.
__________________
'07 Vivid Blue Pearl Sport w/stuff attached in useful places
yeah, but MP isn't everything. I went through the d40/d60 debate too. I decided it wasn't worth the extra $100 for a camera that offers an image that's only 800 pixels wider.
You have to ask your self though, how many pics have you taken with flash so far that required 1/500? Not many probably. Portraiture, static auto shots, etc. very rarely even need 1/250 most of the time unless you're trying to shut out the sun, and even then you can pop on a 1-stop ND filter if it's really necessary. Too many benefits to a better body to hold out only for 1/500 sync.
Well haha, just go check out my flickr and look at the 'more properties', about 8/10 of my shots are way faster than 1/250. Even some are f/11 1/800. Also a lot of times I shoot mid day and I have to kill a lot of ambient, so it really does make that big of a difference. I also think that glass > body. The only other lense I want is the 50 1.4, and that will af with my d40. Besides, for the shooting I want to do (band promos), the kit lens works just fine.