Fit FREAK.net

Go Back   Unofficial Honda FIT Forums > The Honda Fit and Jazz Forums > Other Car Related Discussions

Other Car Related Discussions Discuss all other cars here.

Welcome to Fit Freak!
Welcome to Fit Freak,

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 08:05 PM
New Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0
orbes is on a distinguished road
1993 Honda Civic DX vs. 2007 Honda Fit Sport

I love my '93 Civic hatchback and it has been, hands down, the best car I have ever owned. Always starts, never has trouble in the snow, still gets over 40mpg, and looks half it's age (which is better than I can say for me). I think the biggest issue I have ever had with it was changing the muffler. It has outlasted the other cars I've owned, granted they weren't Honda's, and has easily outlasted than my marriage! But, after 13 years, I'm thinking it may be time to get Fit. I did a comparison of my '93 Hatchback DX to the 2007 Fit Sport (specs from Honda Preview.com) and they are eerily similar:

Civic Hatchback DX vs. 2007 Fit Sport



  • 1.5L 102HP InLine v4 VS. 1.5L 109HP VTEC v4
  • Torque: 102@5500rpm VS. 105@4800
  • Horsepower: 102 VS. 109
  • Turning Diameter (ft.): 32.2 VS. 35.6
  • Wheels: 13" VS. 15"
  • Headroom (in. front/rear): 38.6/36.6 VS. 40.6/38.6
  • Legroom (in. front/rear): 42.5/30.5 VS. 41.9/33.7
  • Shoulder Room (in. front/rear): 53.4/52.10 VS. 52.8/50.6
  • Hiproom (in. front/rear): 49.8/44.6 VS. 51.2/51.0
  • Seating Capacity: 5 VS. 5
  • Wheelbase (in.): 101.3 VS. 96.5
  • Length (in.): 160.2 VS. 157.4
  • Height (in.): 50.7 VS. 60
  • Width (in.) 66.9 VS. 66.2
  • Weight (lbs. - manual transmition): 2178 VS. 2471
  • Fuel Economy (mpg US): 34/40 VS. 33/38
  • Fuel Tank Capacity: 11.9 VS. 10.83
I assume the VTEC engine in the FIT is much better than the InLine v4 in my '93 civic. Does anyone have experience with the VTEC which will be in the fit? I'm a little disappointed in the fuel tank capacity shrinking by a full gallon and the 300 extra pounds added to the Fit but the Fit seems to be back to the old Civic size before Honda and everyone else super-sized their models. I'm looking forward to taking it out for a test drive.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2006, 02:43 PM
SilverNChrome's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 113
Rep Power: 4
SilverNChrome is on a distinguished road
Nice comparison!! Ya, the Fit looks real interesting and I for one can't wait to see this thing close up. The civic hatches from back in the day were good little cars...hopefully the Fit proves to be as good.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:20 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 4
john trials is on a distinguished road
I am thinking the same thing as you. I have a 92 Civic Hatchback...most reliable thing ever. I want a Fit as my next car, but I'll wait until my current car falls apart (with all the rust, it probably won't be too long!).


The main things I wish I had on my 92 (and on a Fit) would be a sunroof/moonroof, and rear disc brakes. The Fit 4-door body is great, as now I have kids.

I did a comparison of numbers just like you. I can't wait to test drive one.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2006, 07:12 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 0
bsgump will become famous soon enough
1992 Honda Civic VX vs. 2007 Honda Fit
Honda should bring back the Civic VX or make a Fit VX for those that want real fuel economy.

15 years ago the 1992 Honda Civic VX 5 speed got 47 mpg city / 56 mpg highway in US Miles Per Gallon. It was one of Honda's most reliable cars as well as one of their best fuel efficient cars.

1.5L 92HP InLine v4 VS. 1.5L 109HP VTEC v4
Torque: 97@5500rpm VS. 105@4800
Horsepower: 92 VS. 109
Turning Diameter (ft.): 32.2 VS. 35.6
Wheels: 13" VS. 15"
Headroom (in. front/rear): 38.6/36.6 VS. 40.6/38.6
Legroom (in. front/rear): 42.5/30.5 VS. 41.9/33.7
Shoulder Room (in. front/rear): 53.4/52.10 VS. 52.8/50.6
Hiproom (in. front/rear): 49.8/44.6 VS. 51.2/51.0
Seating Capacity: 5 VS. 5
Wheelbase (in.): 101.3 VS. 96.5
Length (in.): 160.2 VS. 157.4
Height (in.): 50.7 VS. 60
Width (in.) 66.9 VS. 66.2
Weight (lbs. - manual transmition): 2178 VS. 2471
Fuel Economy (mpg US): 47/56 VS. 33/38
Fuel Tank Capacity: 11.9 VS. 10.83
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2006, 01:41 PM
New Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0
orbes is on a distinguished road
Further comparison

I did a little bit more work and tried to setup a side-by-side comparison of the Fit to similar cars which someone looking at purchasing a Fit may be interested in. For historical sake, the 1993 Civic DX and the 1992 Civic VX (thanks to bsgump) were also included. I'll continue to update this as more details arrive or if someone wants other cars added:

Feel free to click on the Fit Comparison Chart to view it. It is in PDF format so if you do not have a PDF reader such as Adobe Acrobat, you may download one for free here.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2006, 02:25 PM
Someone that spends his life on FitFreak.net
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,144
Rep Power: 5
b17gsr is on a distinguished road
FYI, the Civic VX and the DX do not weigh the same. The VX weighs less. Unfortunately I don't how the exact numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2006, 06:16 PM
New Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0
orbes is on a distinguished road
You are absolutely correct. My mistake. The VX was 2094 vs. 2178 for the DX. Also, the VX was a bit taller. The chart has been updated.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2006, 10:47 PM
Frequent FitFreak Poster
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 730
Rep Power: 4
corey415 will become famous soon enough
Biggest advantage I see with the Fit when compared to older civics is the safety advantage. Front, side, and side curtain airbags as well as EBD and ABS. Also, a more modern frame that will fare considerably better in collisions.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2006, 12:26 AM
New Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 0
vkeks05 is on a distinguished road
Very nice chart, orbes.
Some engines you have listed as V4s though. They're all I4s.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2006, 12:40 AM
vividjazz's Avatar
Someone that Posts too much
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 718
Rep Power: 5
vividjazz will become famous soon enough
The VX & DX Civics were very much ahead of their time for emissions but they certainly don't exceed the 2010 standards like the Fit.
__________________
Australian Honda Fit Jazz Club - www.ausfit.com
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2006, 12:40 AM
New Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0
orbes is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the correction vkeks05. This chart seems to have helped a few people I know who are looking at each of these similar cars in the coming months. I'd be happy to add other models if people want. Just let me know the make/model/year.

Yea, the Fit definitely offers much better emissions and safety features than the VX & DX Civics of the past. Does anyone have an opinion of the older v4 Inline engine vs. the VTEC which will be in the Fit? I don't have experience with the VTEC, just the iVTEC. I assume it is a decent engine as all Honda engines seem to be?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2006, 02:38 AM
vividjazz's Avatar
Someone that Posts too much
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 718
Rep Power: 5
vividjazz will become famous soon enough
The Fits SOHC VTEC is VTEC-E so pretty much the same as the HX Civic mechanism and intake side only. The Fit is however an L-Series not D-Series motor and brings with it not just a far more compact design but the basis for a whole swag of future engines from the new platform. Its lighter, features piston skirts which are coated with 'pulverized molydebnum' as on the 'real' Type R DC2 Integras B18C engine, full stainless steel exhaust, EGR and an oblique flow convertor cat. Amazingly the L15A VTEC has comparable power to the D15B with its 3 stage VTEC.

Excellent article on the engine can be found here
http://asia.vtec.net/Series/FitJazz/lseries/index.html


Graph shows that both the i-dsi and the VTEC L-Series engines are just as fuel efficent as the lean burn D-Series motors.

No raw figures do justice to the real world drivability of the L15A VTEC as implimented in the Fit. Just as with many Honda bikes that appear to lose to the competition on paper with figures they consistently win on the track because of vastly superior usable power.
__________________
Australian Honda Fit Jazz Club - www.ausfit.com

Last edited by vividjazz; 02-26-2006 at 02:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
92, civic, dx, gallon, honda, miles

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Go


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0