Interesting Note on Horsepower
I'm an avid reader of autoblog, and today they were doing an initial review of the Hyundai Sonata turbo. One of the notes they mentioned was that the Sonata has a class-leading 12 lb/hp ratio, .1 lb/hp lower than the new Ford Mustang (wtf?). Interested, I do the calculations and notice a surprisingly large difference between our cars and others.
Hyundai Sonata: 3350 lb / 274 hp = 12 lb/hp Honda Civic: 2750 lb / 140 hp = 19.6 lb/hp VW Golf: 3000 lb / 170 hp = 17.6 lb/hp Kia Forte: 2740 lb / 156 hp = 17.5 lb/hp Honda Fit: 2600 lb / 117 hp = 22 lb/hp!!!! I don't know about you guys, but when I was cross-shopping the fit to other vehicles (Civic, Kia Forte, VW golf), I was really worried about the lack of hp from the Fit, but seeing this, it really puts it into perspective. |
Thats a whole lot of weight to move
|
some more for reference... of course I bought mine for mpg to space ratio :)
Acura TSX=205 / $29000 / 15.7 / 455 Acura TL=286 / $39000 / 12.6 / 491 Audi TT=255 / $40000 / 10.9 / 436 Audi A3=250 / $34000 / 12.9 / 438 Audi RS4=420 / $66000 / 8.6 / 567 BMW 3 Series=300 / $41000 / 10.9 / 446 BMW Z4=330 / $51800 / 9.1 / 464 Bugati Veyron 16.4 =987 / $1,200,000 / 4.2 / 5040 Buick LaCrosse=240 / $29000 / 14.5 / 476 Buick Lucerbe=275 / $35000 / 13.6 / 420 Cadillac CTS-V=400 / $51000 / 9.2 / 469 Cadillac STS-V=469 / $77000 / 8.2 / 631 Chevy Cobalt SS=205 / $22000 / 13.5 / 297 Chevy Corvette C6=400 / $45000 / 7.95 / 357 Chevy Corvette Z06=505 / $70000 / 6.3 / 441 Chevy Impala SS=303 / $28000 / 11.7 / 327 Chevy Malibu SS=240 / $25000 / 13.2 / 330 Chevy Monte Carlo SS=303 / $28000 / 11.0 / 308 Chevy Trailblazer SS=395 / $33000 / 12.0 / 396 Chrysler Crossfire=215 / $40000 / 14.0 / 560 Chrysler PT Cruiser=230 / $29000 / 13.3 / 385 Chrysler 300C SRT-8=425 / $40000 / 8.7 / 348 Dodge Caliber SRT-4=300 / $24000 / 9.8 / 235 Dodge Charger SRT-8=425 / $36000 / 8.9 / 320 Dodge Viper SRT-10=510 / $84000 / 6.7 / 562 Ford Mustang GT500=500 / $41000 / 6.7 / 274 Ford Mustang GT=300 / $28000 / 11.5 / 322 Honda S2000=237 / $34000 / 11.9 / 404 Honda Civic Si=197 / $24000 / 14.6 / 408 Hyundai Tiburon=172 / $20000 / 17.3 / 346 Infinite G35=315 / $35000 / 11.1 / 388 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8=425 / $40000 / 11.2 / 448 Lexus IS350=306 / $35000 / 11.3 / 395 Lincoln MKZ=263 / $35000 / 12.9 / 450 Lotus Elise=190 / $43000 / 10.4 / 447 Lotus Exige=243 / $80000 / 8.1 / 648 (Not street legal) Mazda MX-5=170 / $28000 / 14.35 / 401 Mazda RX-8=238 / $28000 / 12.7 / 355 MazdaSpeed3=260 / $24000 / 10.3 / 247 MazdaSpeed6=287 / $30000 / 11.1 / 333 Mercedes CLK=475 / $85000 / 7.5 / 637 Mini Cooper S=175 / $25000 / 14.5 / 362 Mitsubishi Evo XI=286 / $35000 / 11.18 / 391 Mitsubishi Eclipse=260 / $29000 / 14.1 / 408 Nissan Altima=365 / $30000 / 11.5 / 345 Nissan 350Z=315 / $42000 / 10.6 / 445 Pontiac Solstice GXP=260 / $26000 / 11.5 / 299 Pontiac G6=252 / $29000 / 13.4 / 388 Pontiac Grand Prix=303 / $28000 / 11.4 / 320 Porche Boxter S=295 / $65000 / 9.7 / 630 Porche Cayman S=295 / $70000 / 10 / 700 Saleen S7 Twin Turbo=750 / $600000 / 3.9 / 2340 Saturn Ion=205 / $21000 / 13.4 / 281 Saturn Sky=260 / $29000 / 11.2 / 324 Scion tC=161 / $17000 / 18.0 / 306 Subaru STI=293 / $33000 / 10.3 / 339 Subaru Legacy=250 / $34000 / 12.2 / 414 VW Jetta=200 / $24000 / 16.1 / 386 VW GTI=200 / $23000 / 15.8 / 363 Volvo V50=218 / $35000 / 14.8 / 518 Volvo S60=300 / $36000 / 11.6 / 417 Volvo V70=300 / $37000 / 10.98 / 406 Volvo S80=311 / $45000 / 11.2 / 515 |
Originally Posted by Kwonye
(Post 882810)
I'm an avid reader of autoblog, and today they were doing an initial review of the Hyundai Sonata turbo. One of the notes they mentioned was that the Sonata has a class-leading 12 lb/hp ratio, .1 lb/hp lower than the new Ford Mustang (wtf?). Interested, I do the calculations and notice a surprisingly large difference between our cars and others.
Hyundai Sonata: 3350 lb / 274 hp = 12 lb/hp Honda Civic: 2750 lb / 140 hp = 19.6 lb/hp VW Golf: 3000 lb / 170 hp = 17.6 lb/hp Kia Forte: 2740 lb / 156 hp = 17.5 lb/hp Honda Fit: 2600 lb / 117 hp = 22 lb/hp!!!! I don't know about you guys, but when I was cross-shopping the fit to other vehicles (Civic, Kia Forte, VW golf), I was really worried about the lack of hp from the Fit, but seeing this, it really puts it into perspective. |
A Base model MT would score 21.2 lb/hp, not that it makes much of a difference.
|
The problem with hp comparisons is, while good for marketing, no one drives on the street winding the engine out to peak every shift. Its torque that makes a car feel powerful. Honda approaches this two ways with the US-spec Fit. One, i-VTEC, and two, aggressive gearing. The Fit still has a competitive 0-60 time.
A 200hp diesel engine can move 20,000 lbs of truck and trailer. Do you think that 274hp Hyundai engine could? With enough gearing, yes, for a short time before it destructs. |
Originally Posted by nikita
(Post 883159)
The problem with hp comparisons is, while good for marketing, no one drives on the street winding the engine out to peak every shift. Its torque that makes a car feel powerful. Honda approaches this two ways with the US-spec Fit. One, i-VTEC, and two, aggressive gearing. The Fit still has a competitive 0-60 time.
A 200hp diesel engine can move 20,000 lbs of truck and trailer. Do you think that 274hp Hyundai engine could? With enough gearing, yes, for a short time before it destructs. Horesepower sells cars... Torque wins races. Not that I am out racing, just contributing to nikita's point. |
My other car has 8 lbs/HP. But still manages near 30 mpg on the highway. :)
|
Interesting Note on Horsepower
Originally Posted by Kwonye
(Post 882810)
I'm an avid reader of autoblog, and today they were doing an initial review of the Hyundai Sonata turbo. One of the notes they mentioned was that the Sonata has a class-leading 12 lb/hp ratio, .1 lb/hp lower than the new Ford Mustang (wtf?). Interested, I do the calculations and notice a surprisingly large difference between our cars and others.
Hyundai Sonata: 3350 lb / 274 hp = 12 lb/hp Honda Civic: 2750 lb / 140 hp = 19.6 lb/hp VW Golf: 3000 lb / 170 hp = 17.6 lb/hp Kia Forte: 2740 lb / 156 hp = 17.5 lb/hp Honda Fit: 2600 lb / 117 hp = 22 lb/hp!!!! I don't know about you guys, but when I was cross-shopping the fit to other vehicles (Civic, Kia Forte, VW golf), I was really worried about the lack of hp from the Fit, but seeing this, it really puts it into perspective. But it does show less hp in the examples above. The larger number is less hp relative to its weight. The reciproals show the difference. Hyundai Sonata: 274 hp / 3350 lb = .082 hp/lb Honda Civic: 140 hp / 2750 lb = .051 hp/lb VW Golf: 170 hp / 3000 lb = .057 hp/lb Kia Forte: 156 hp / 2740 = .057 hp/lb Honda Fit: 117 hp / 2600 lb = .045 hp/lb |
is the sonata a 4banger turbo or 6? if 4 and 274hp and 3350lbs, it's still a dog.
|
Originally Posted by Kwonye
(Post 882810)
I'm an avid reader of autoblog, and today they were doing an initial review of the Hyundai Sonata turbo. One of the notes they mentioned was that the Sonata has a class-leading 12 lb/hp ratio, .1 lb/hp lower than the new Ford Mustang (wtf?). Interested, I do the calculations and notice a surprisingly large difference between our cars and others.
Hyundai Sonata: 3350 lb / 274 hp = 12 lb/hp Honda Civic: 2750 lb / 140 hp = 19.6 lb/hp VW Golf: 3000 lb / 170 hp = 17.6 lb/hp Kia Forte: 2740 lb / 156 hp = 17.5 lb/hp Honda Fit: 2600 lb / 117 hp = 22 lb/hp!!!! I don't know about you guys, but when I was cross-shopping the fit to other vehicles (Civic, Kia Forte, VW golf), I was really worried about the lack of hp from the Fit, but seeing this, it really puts it into perspective. Horsepower only good for top speed where weight is not so important. For most, its torque that counts as it is the more important for acceleration. If you calculate the torque in lb-ft for each of those cars you might see another conclusion. For example the Fit has about 109 lb-ft (23.8:1) while the Sonata supposedly has 286 lb-ft (11.5:1) yet both have mpg ratings of about 28 and 32) Ah, the gearing matters. |
2600lbs?!?! Are you sure about that number? I only ask, because the Fit here in Japan, the RS in 5MT comes in at 1050kg or 2310lbs. And can go up to 1080kg with dealer options (skyroof and whatnot). The CVT model starts at 1080kg and can go up to 1100 (2420lbs). Even the 4WD model weighs in at 1170kg, which is still 26lbs lighter than what you stated.
I checked Honda's US site and the weight is not listed within the specs for whatever reason. |
Originally Posted by loubob57
(Post 883190)
My other car has 8 lbs/HP. But still manages near 30 mpg on the highway. :)
Power to weight is why the most cost effective performance mods for a Fit are things that reduce weight. Removing the spare tire, and all but the driver's seat will yield a significant performance benefit, but the Fit will no longer be a practical, multi-use car. |
Originally Posted by nikita
(Post 883159)
The problem with hp comparisons is, while good for marketing, no one drives on the street winding the engine out to peak every shift. Its torque that makes a car feel powerful. Honda approaches this two ways with the US-spec Fit. One, i-VTEC, and two, aggressive gearing. The Fit still has a competitive 0-60 time.
A 200hp diesel engine can move 20,000 lbs of truck and trailer. Do you think that 274hp Hyundai engine could? With enough gearing, yes, for a short time before it destructs. The fit isn't as light as it should be. An echo hb can manage the 0-60mph in maybe 0.5 second less than a fit too, while having much longter gears (2nd gear go over 65mph).
Originally Posted by 555sexydrive
(Post 883501)
2600lbs?!?! Are you sure about that number? I only ask, because the Fit here in Japan, the RS in 5MT comes in at 1050kg or 2310lbs. And can go up to 1080kg with dealer options (skyroof and whatnot). The CVT model starts at 1080kg and can go up to 1100 (2420lbs). Even the 4WD model weighs in at 1170kg, which is still 26lbs lighter than what you stated.
I checked Honda's US site and the weight is not listed within the specs for whatever reason. |
Real world, I've had to put the pedal to the metal a couple of times lately, to get around completely coma induced moron drivers. First thing, the pedal actually had to go to the metal [didn't paddle]. Second thing, the Fit's bark is quite a bit louder than it's bite. I sounded great and it felt great, but then I realized I wasn't moving all too fast past the shmuck and as everyone knows, when you're gonna pass a shmuck you at least want to make an unmistakeable statement- bye asshole. I did what I had to do, but I do miss supreme power when needed. Nine times out of ten, the Fit's giddy-yap is perfectly accetable. I've bolted nicely many a time- even better than expected. But a bullet it's not, and knowing the limits is actually something that is helpful, out there among the rest of the brain dead ass wipe drivers that surround you.
I know none of YOU are in that category, of course. ;) :vtec: Dan |
Originally Posted by Shockwave199
(Post 883521)
Real world, I've had to put the pedal to the metal a couple of times lately, to get around completely coma induced moron drivers. First thing, the pedal actually had to go to the metal [didn't paddle]. Second thing, the Fit's bark is quite a bit louder than it's bite. I sounded great and it felt great, but then I realized I wasn't moving all too fast past the shmuck and as everyone knows, when you're gonna pass a shmuck you at least want to make an unmistakeable statement- bye asshole. I did what I had to do, but I do miss supreme power when needed. Nine times out of ten, the Fit's giddy-yap is perfectly accetable. I've bolted nicely many a time- even better than expected. But a bullet it's not, and knowing the limits is actually something that is helpful, out there among the rest of the brain dead ass wipe drivers that surround you.
I know none of YOU are in that category, of course. ;) :vtec: Dan |
I'll have to at least experiment with paddling a down shift. I think that could have served me better.
Dan |
Originally Posted by Shockwave199
(Post 883529)
I'll have to at least experiment with paddling a down shift. I think that could have served me better.
Dan In the past I drove two vehicles that had the auto-manual gear shift. And even though I knew how to drive a manual, I just couldn't shift properly with those things. At which point I decided not to mess with em, unless it's my own (I don't mind breaking my OWN toys). |
Ah the old torque vs HP argument... So much misinformation heh heh:popc:
Peak Horsepower sells cars Mean (avg) Horsepower wins races Torque is used to calculate horsepower... and tow boats. |
Originally Posted by Lyon[Nightroad]
(Post 883564)
Ah the old torque vs HP argument... So much misinformation heh heh:popc:
Peak Horsepower sells cars Mean (avg) Horsepower wins races Torque is used to calculate horsepower... and tow boats. HP = torque x rpm divided by 5250. Advertised HP decided by marketing sells cars you forgot traction in towing. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands