![]() |
PRM's intake dyno figures
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/images/icons/icon14.gif dyno results are in
O.K we dyno'd Kifu's car tonight, you can consider this an independent test because i was not there. i only have the figures for you, should have the graph soon, kifu has a print out, so you may see it tomorrow. base line whp = 94.1 base line torque= 91. PRM intake whp = 99.4 PRM intake torque = 95.9 a solid 5 hp & 5 ftlbs of torque to the wheels. should make even more power with the exhaust- stay tuned !!!:popc: Gerry |
Sweet!!! This should bring you more business Gerry!!!
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
Looks like a solid 5ft-lbs and 5whp throughout the entire powerband. That's a-nice! =]
|
It's nice to see some results but I wish both plots were over the full RPM range. I'm always a little suspicious when dyno testing shows constant improvement over the whole range since that often indicates a change (correction factor) that is giving a false result. For any significant change you can make to intake or exhaust, a test over the full range will always show some clear variation in improvement with RPM. I would hope to see that if both tests were run from 2K to redline.
|
Originally Posted by DrPhyzx
(Post 495574)
It's nice to see some results but I wish both plots were over the full RPM range. I'm always a little suspicious when dyno testing shows constant improvement over the whole range since that often indicates a change (correction factor) that is giving a false result. For any significant change you can make to intake or exhaust, a test over the full range will always show some clear variation in improvement with RPM. I would hope to see that if both tests were run from 2K to redline.
|
I'd like to know if there is a difference in fuel economy.
|
Originally Posted by zakurie
(Post 495745)
I'd like to know if there is a difference in fuel economy.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands