USA Today Review
I was kinda thinking the same thing. It seems like all the reviews mention the same items and come to nearly the same conclusions.
Healy did focus a little more on the price though, and I had not thought of satellite radio.
Healy did focus a little more on the price though, and I had not thought of satellite radio.
Originally Posted by DRum
I was kinda thinking the same thing. It seems like all the reviews mention the same items and come to nearly the same conclusions.
Healy did focus a little more on the price though, and I had not thought of satellite radio.
Healy did focus a little more on the price though, and I had not thought of satellite radio.
1. Despite what he thinks, using rear drum brakes aren't an issue since being a FWD car, most of the braking will be done by the front wheels anyway.
2. The torsion bar rear suspension has not adversely affected ride quality or handling as some had feared.
3. Honda never did offer very fancy radios for the Fit/Jazz even in Japan. The 200 watt stereo found on the US-market Fit Sport is almost identical to the top-end stereo found on the JDM Fit. Honda could have offered the stereo/navigation system similar to the JDM optional unit, but that would have been an option that could have cost over US$1,200!
4. Healy forgot that the automated climated control is a US$1,000+ option on the JDM Fit. I don't think Americans want to want over US$1,000 just for a fancy climate control system.
Originally Posted by MtViewGuy188
I read the review and I think Mr. Healy forgot a couple of things:
1. Despite what he thinks, using rear drum brakes aren't an issue since being a FWD car, most of the braking will be done by the front wheels anyway.
2. The torsion bar rear suspension has not adversely affected ride quality or handling as some had feared.
3. Honda never did offer very fancy radios for the Fit/Jazz even in Japan. The 200 watt stereo found on the US-market Fit Sport is almost identical to the top-end stereo found on the JDM Fit. Honda could have offered the stereo/navigation system similar to the JDM optional unit, but that would have been an option that could have cost over US$1,200!
...
1. Despite what he thinks, using rear drum brakes aren't an issue since being a FWD car, most of the braking will be done by the front wheels anyway.
2. The torsion bar rear suspension has not adversely affected ride quality or handling as some had feared.
3. Honda never did offer very fancy radios for the Fit/Jazz even in Japan. The 200 watt stereo found on the US-market Fit Sport is almost identical to the top-end stereo found on the JDM Fit. Honda could have offered the stereo/navigation system similar to the JDM optional unit, but that would have been an option that could have cost over US$1,200!
...
2. Yeah I dont know why the reviewer was complaining about the rear suspension. It's a subcompact, and torsion beam suspensions are the norm.
3. The reviewer was simply complaining that you cant get integrated XM. They really should have included that. It's a moot point for me though, since I prefer Sirius.
Originally Posted by corey415
1. Actually all cars mainly depend on the front brakes (whether FWD/RWD/AWD) since the weight of the vehicle shifts to the front while braking from forward motion. The reason why the Fit or other subcompacts dont really need rear discs is due to the vehicle being light.
Originally Posted by corey415
2. Yeah I dont know why the reviewer was complaining about the rear suspension. It's a subcompact, and torsion beam suspensions are the norm.
Originally Posted by corey415
3. The reviewer was simply complaining that you cant get integrated XM. They really should have included that. It's a moot point for me though, since I prefer Sirius.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




