2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tire replacement on 2010 sport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-23-2011, 10:40 PM
Cybertar's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 29
Tire replacement on 2010 sport

Thinking about going with a 195/50ZR16 Continental ExtremeContact DWS
on stock sport rims. Anyone see any issues? Rubbing or clearance? Any additional performance?
 
  #2  
Old 10-24-2011, 11:08 AM
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OG Club
Posts: 20,289
was the stock tire 185/55/16? I cant remember. if so, you wil run shorter profile so unless your car is lowered it will look lifted. from performance side, i think you will gain quite a bit.
 
  #3  
Old 10-24-2011, 11:15 AM
MikeNSX's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 117
I don't know about sizing, but the Continental DWS is a great tire.

We have them on my wife's BMW 325i and love them. Smooth, quiet, and with a 540 tread wear rating...long lasting.
 
  #4  
Old 10-24-2011, 07:58 PM
Cybertar's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by kenchan
was the stock tire 185/55/16? I cant remember. if so, you wil run shorter profile so unless your car is lowered it will look lifted. from performance side, i think you will gain quite a bit.
Thanks for the input. The way I understand tire sizing is the 50 series is a lower profile than the 55 series. So won't it look lower rather than lifted? I used the link as my reference. Visual Tyre Size Calculator | Kouki Tech
 
  #5  
Old 10-24-2011, 08:13 PM
Goobers's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wandering around.
Posts: 4,295
Originally Posted by Cybertar
Thanks for the input. The way I understand tire sizing is the 50 series is a lower profile than the 55 series. So won't it look lower rather than lifted? I used the link as my reference. Visual Tyre Size Calculator | Kouki Tech
the tire wall is shorter, yes. but the car will look lifted due to the increased GAP from the tire to the car.

But since the gap is only increasing by about 2.1mm... it shouldn't be noticeable to most people.

Overall the car will "lower" itself slightly due to the shorter height from the wheel to the ground. But because wheels don't stay perfect circles when sitting on the ground, the effect is even less.

However, it can affect the odo. my odo was reading a bit high with stock tires. saying i was going 35 when i was only doing 34 according to my GPS and police "your speed" signs. The 195/55/16 will increase that inaccuracy a bit more. I put 205/50/16 tires (and more air pressure, usually 38psi) and now is much more accurate (according to the same GPS).
 
  #6  
Old 10-24-2011, 08:14 PM
GAFIT's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cleveland, GA
Posts: 4,330
Those will be shorter than the factory tires which will make the gap between the tire and fender larger and will make your speedometer and odometer read higher.

205/50-16 work out to be extremely close in diameter to your original tires.
 
  #7  
Old 10-24-2011, 08:25 PM
Cybertar's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 29
OK, I understand now! Just trying to wrap my mind around this tire sizing thing. So besides the 205/50-16 being closer to the stock size, are there any other pro's or con's? I noticed the 205's are two pounds heavier that the 195's. That seems like a big difference, but maybe not. My real concern is driving in snow. The stock tires just suck in snow! No other way to put it! Everyone I've talked to loves the Continental ExtremeContact DWS in snow.
 

Last edited by Cybertar; 10-24-2011 at 08:47 PM.
  #8  
Old 10-24-2011, 09:24 PM
Goobers's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wandering around.
Posts: 4,295
Originally Posted by Cybertar
OK, I understand now! Just trying to wrap my mind around this tire sizing thing. So besides the 205/50-16 being closer to the stock size, are there any other pro's or con's? I noticed the 205's are two pounds heavier that the 195's. That seems like a big difference, but maybe not. My real concern is driving in snow. The stock tires just suck in snow! No other way to put it! Everyone I've talked to loves the Continental ExtremeContact DWS in snow.
The tires I bought are Conti DWS tires, but I got them after last winter. So, I have yet to try them out in winter conditions.

While they should be better tires than my stock Dunlops, they are also wider. The current feeling by most is that narrower tires are better in snow than wider. They have less width, so they don't need to "plow" through as much snow.

And due to the overall contact patch (whatever surface area of the tire touching the ground) being smaller, it means the car is putting more weight per square inch on the ground, allowing it to dig through snow to the pavement. But of course, sometimes that's bad too, if there's only ice and if the tire is no good on ice.

So... I have no idea how differently the car is going to handle this coming winter. Gotta love Chicagoland winters... *sigh*

BTW... as horrible as I think the stock tires are... I manage to outmaneuver plenty of other vehicles (once I get going), cars, vans and trucks alike. It all boils down to your control over it. I'm just too aggressive on my starts, so I end up starting in 3rd gear.
 
  #9  
Old 10-24-2011, 09:40 PM
2fstfru's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 24
I think you will like the Conti tires. I love them, Ive got the same tires on my Golf, and they do last quite a while, even with my aggressive driving. Im sure you wont notice too much of a difference in the snow either. I thought the Dunlops were terrible in the winter, and Colorado winters are MILD compared to most
 
  #10  
Old 10-24-2011, 10:44 PM
specboy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,462
Originally Posted by Cybertar
OK, I understand now! Just trying to wrap my mind around this tire sizing thing. So besides the 205/50-16 being closer to the stock size, are there any other pro's or con's? I noticed the 205's are two pounds heavier that the 195's. That seems like a big difference, but maybe not. My real concern is driving in snow. The stock tires just suck in snow! No other way to put it! Everyone I've talked to loves the Continental ExtremeContact DWS in snow.
One Major Con. your Warranty will run out sooner.
I'd go with the 205's to keep the same overall diameter and get even better handling.

~SB
 
  #11  
Old 10-25-2011, 01:12 AM
Jay784's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 28
Originally Posted by Cybertar
OK, I understand now! Just trying to wrap my mind around this tire sizing thing. So besides the 205/50-16 being closer to the stock size, are there any other pro's or con's? I noticed the 205's are two pounds heavier that the 195's. That seems like a big difference, but maybe not. My real concern is driving in snow. The stock tires just suck in snow! No other way to put it! Everyone I've talked to loves the Continental ExtremeContact DWS in snow.
here's how those tire numbers work.

National Tire : Tire Basics : Understanding Your Tires
Tire Size Markings
The tire size shown below is P185/60R14 82H. The 185 represents its section width (tire width in mm). The 60 is the tires Aspect Ratio (the ratio of the sidewall height to the tread width).
great way to figure out a +0 size from the stock rubber
Tire size calculator
 
  #12  
Old 10-25-2011, 05:41 AM
Cybertar's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by Jay784
here's how those tire numbers work.

great way to figure out a +0 size from the stock rubber
Tire size calculator
The tire size calculator really helps put things in perspective. Thanks all
 
  #13  
Old 10-25-2011, 11:03 AM
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OG Club
Posts: 20,289
Originally Posted by Cybertar
Thanks for the input. The way I understand tire sizing is the 50 series is a lower profile than the 55 series. So won't it look lower rather than lifted? I used the link as my reference. Visual Tyre Size Calculator | Kouki Tech

you will end up with more wheel gap because the sidewall is shorter. this exaggerates the lifted look.
 
  #14  
Old 10-25-2011, 11:13 AM
smaglik's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Flagstaff,AZ
Posts: 233
I have 40,000 miles on a set of these, and they have performed and worn well. I have the 205/50 R16s. They probably have about 10k miles left.
 
  #15  
Old 11-07-2011, 12:26 PM
forress's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cranford, NJ
Posts: 30
After weeks of hunting on CL for 15" steelies or Civic/Integra alloys for snow tires with no success, I'm also considering getting the all season Continental ExtremeContact DWS (195/50-16) to replace my stock 09 Fit Sport's Dunlops with 40k.

After some research here and on tirerack, it seems like the ExtremeContact DWS performs well in the winter but not as good as true snow tires while saving me the hassle and money of switching out tires/wheels in the summer. In addition to buying separate rims.

I've bought Continental ExtremeWinterContact (studless snows) for my wife's Camry last year and we were very happy with the performance last winter when we had 4+ blizzards in the Northeast. Hopefully the DWS will not let us down.
 
  #16  
Old 11-07-2011, 01:02 PM
sooznd's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,453
Originally Posted by forress
After weeks of hunting on CL for 15" steelies or Civic/Integra alloys for snow tires with no success, I'm also considering getting the all season Continental ExtremeContact DWS (195/50-16) to replace my stock 09 Fit Sport's Dunlops with 40k.

I've bought Continental ExtremeWinterContact (studless snows) for my wife's Camry last year and we were very happy with the performance last winter when we had 4+ blizzards in the Northeast. Hopefully the DWS will not let us down.
Many people are using 205/50/16 size on the GE Fits as it seems like the closest in size to the oem.--would replacing with 195/50/16 improve mpg?

It's easy to compare tire sizes with this Discount Tire Size calculator someone posted a while back. Looks as though the 195 size would wear sooner with more revs per mile

Tire Dimensions Made Simple - Discount Tire
 
  #17  
Old 11-07-2011, 07:31 PM
specboy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,462
Originally Posted by sooznd
Many people are using 205/50/16 size on the GE Fits as it seems like the closest in size to the oem.--would replacing with 195/50/16 improve mpg?

It's easy to compare tire sizes with this Discount Tire Size calculator someone posted a while back. Looks as though the 195 size would wear sooner with more revs per mile

Tire Dimensions Made Simple - Discount Tire
195/50/16" will lower the car and do more harm in the winter as the op would be plowing the roads for everyone else behind you. 205/50/16" is definitely the way to go.

OP, Consider going with the continental DWS for the first season and keep up your hunt for Alloys over the next year. Since the DWS would be brand new, you'd have the best winter traction on them this season of any. I ran the Stock tires the first winter and had no issues. After that, I went to dedicated snows but that's here in VT. In NJ, you get more Icy road conditions due to Thaw/freeze after a snow storm than we do as it just never gets warm enough to thaw.

~SB
 
  #18  
Old 01-25-2012, 10:31 PM
carolem's Avatar
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: MA
Posts: 12
Cybertar,

Hi, which tires did you ultimately get? I'm very interested because it's time for me to get new ones for my 2010 Fit Sport! Thanks.
 
  #19  
Old 01-25-2012, 11:45 PM
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Capital Distric New York
Posts: 3,416
Not sure what he settled on but I'll tell you the Continental DWS he was looking at is one heck of a tire.

I recently put 205/50/16's on my 2010 Sport and totally love them.
Great winter performance - not that we're having a challenging winter, but the Christmas holidays in Maine made me a believer.

10" of snow down a 1/4 mile unpaved drive and no issue what so ever.
Then an hour or so on the Maine pike in blowing packed powder with the same results.

A first class tire that should have come on the Fit in the first place. No drop in MPG and speedo is dead on.

K_C_
 
  #20  
Old 01-26-2012, 12:43 AM
carolem's Avatar
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: MA
Posts: 12
Originally Posted by Krimson_Cardnal
Not sure what he settled on but I'll tell you the Continental DWS he was looking at is one heck of a tire.

I recently put 205/50/16's on my 2010 Sport and totally love them.
Great winter performance - not that we're having a challenging winter, but the Christmas holidays in Maine made me a believer.

10" of snow down a 1/4 mile unpaved drive and no issue what so ever.
Then an hour or so on the Maine pike in blowing packed powder with the same results.

A first class tire that should have come on the Fit in the first place. No drop in MPG and speedo is dead on.

K_C_

Very nice! And great information. I am very close to buying the 205/50/16's, although at tirerack.com, they have only 205/55/16's. I'll assume it's close enough unless you or others tell me differently...
 


Quick Reply: Tire replacement on 2010 sport



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 PM.