Fit FREAK.net

Go Back   Honda FIT Forums > The Honda Fit and Jazz Forums > General Fit Talk

General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2006, 09:37 AM
Kostas's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 3
Kostas is on a distinguished road
Does anyone know the drag coeff of Honda jazz?

Hello.
Does anyone know the drag coeff (or CD) of Honda jazz? I need this parameter because I have a gadget [www.myscantool.com] that through
obd2 and it counts cars performance.
Thank you guys.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2006, 02:36 AM
Bill L's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 184
Rep Power: 3
Bill L is on a distinguished road
In all the Fit previews/news/reviews and other countries' honda websites that I've looked at I've never found that info either-- has any Jazz owner read a non-US auto mag review that listed the Cd?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2006, 04:07 AM
xorbe's Avatar
Frequent FitFreak Poster
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA USA
Posts: 855
Rep Power: 9
xorbe is a jewel in the roughxorbe is a jewel in the roughxorbe is a jewel in the roughxorbe is a jewel in the rough
I googled high and low, and didn't find squat for Fit or Jazz. Would estimate the Fit to be 0.33 to 0.40 from what I saw on other cars when googling -- but that's a WAG... (wild a** guess)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2006, 05:33 AM
fit_4_a_king's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 3
fit_4_a_king is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by xorbe
I googled high and low, and didn't find squat for Fit or Jazz. Would estimate the Fit to be 0.33 to 0.40 from what I saw on other cars when googling -- but that's a WAG... (wild a** guess)
0.33 is probably to low IMHO, as the 1988-1991 CRX HF was at 0.29, while the Si version was at 0.30. The only other car I know of in the 0.29 was the Lexus LS400 when they first came out, and that was because the did extensive under body work to acheive that. My guess is close to 0.40, as I think that 0.50 would be like a 45 degree angle where 1.0 is a straight horizontal surface (although my guess could be totally wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2006, 08:47 AM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 3
HaulSmall is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kostas
Hello.
Does anyone know the drag coeff (or CD) of Honda jazz? I need this parameter because I have a gadget [www.myscantool.com] that through
obd2 and it counts cars performance.
Thank you guys.
I found an entry on the Edmunds Toyota Matrix discussion board which lists the Matrix Cd as 0.321. I don't know what the cooling drag of the two cars is like, but as the body shapes are so similar, I would expect the form drag to be very similar. The body of the Fit has fewer transitions and protrusions than the Matrix, but you should be able to use 0.33 as a value for comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2006, 12:45 PM
xorbe's Avatar
Frequent FitFreak Poster
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA USA
Posts: 855
Rep Power: 9
xorbe is a jewel in the roughxorbe is a jewel in the roughxorbe is a jewel in the roughxorbe is a jewel in the rough
The Matrix is 3.7 inches wider, 1.6 inches taller, and 13.9 inches longer. If the Matrix is 0.321, the Fit could be lower than that. And even it looks like the Fit's frontend is more ideally sloped too.





(Matrix image flipped to point it the same direction.)

Last edited by xorbe; 05-19-2006 at 12:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2006, 12:58 PM
aziatiklover's Avatar
Master FitFreaker
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: welcome to Jamrock
Posts: 2,386
Rep Power: 5
aziatiklover will become famous soon enough
nice comp man
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2006, 08:27 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 3
HaulSmall is on a distinguished road
The Matrix is 3.7 inches wider, 1.6 inches taller, and 13.9 inches longer. If the Matrix is 0.321, the Fit could be lower than that. And even it looks like the Fit's frontend is more ideally sloped too.


Excellent points (Thanks for the pictures).
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2006, 01:20 AM
Pirelli P Zero's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central PA
Posts: 211
Rep Power: 6
Pirelli P Zero has a spectacular aura aboutPirelli P Zero has a spectacular aura about
Honda is no longer posting Cd figures, but I wish they would...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Go


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0