2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

09 Fit Sport Navi 0-60 in 8.3 secs.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #1  
CrystalFiveMT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,662
From: New York State
09 Fit Sport Navi 0-60 in 8.3 secs.

New Motor Trend test on Fit:

2009 Honda Fit Sport - Quick Test - Motor Trend

I predicted 8.4 secs from Car and Driver, so I'm pleased with this faster time, and I told you all not to give much weight to Edmund's 10.2 time.
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #2  
jayu's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 45
From: Bay Area, CA
wow.. huge difference
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 02:40 PM
  #3  
Tastycakes's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 105
From: libertyville, il
Yea i was expecting a faster time than edmunds. I mean the Yaris is around that ~10 second mark and it has only like 13 less hp or something.
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 04:58 PM
  #4  
CrystalFiveMT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,662
From: New York State
I didn't think it would be possible, but it's turning out that I think I'm loving this car more each day.
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #5  
celph titled's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 57
From: Portland, OR
take that gd3
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 08:06 PM
  #6  
hanzo's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 493
From: Richmond, VA
They must have a 120 lbs man with tank almost empty for that kind of time.
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #7  
TOOL's Avatar
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,487
From: San Ramon, CA
I knew Edmunds was a fluke.
Very nice numbers indeed. Faster then i expected.
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #8  
Neebs's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 357
From: Tucson, Az
5 Year Member
Better driver this time.
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #9  
B1str0's Avatar
RubberBabyBuggyBumpers
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,107
From: Orlando
points to avy ...thread/ lol
 
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 11:39 PM
  #10  
CrystalFiveMT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,662
From: New York State
Bump you up. In case you haven't seen this.
 
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #11  
FormulaJDM's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 316
From: Tucson,AZ
5 Year Member
Unlike Ray, they probably don't miss shifts.
 
Old Sep 27, 2008 | 03:01 AM
  #12  
JDM_DOHC_SiR's Avatar
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (49)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,804
From: San Diego, CA
Red face ouch

Originally Posted by 98TypeR
Unlike Ray, they probably don't miss shifts.

DOH!!...
 
Old Sep 27, 2008 | 09:20 AM
  #13  
mahout's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,371
From: NC USA
Originally Posted by CrystalFiveMT
New Motor Trend test on Fit:

2009 Honda Fit Sport - Quick Test - Motor Trend

I predicted 8.4 secs from Car and Driver, so I'm pleased with this faster time, and I told you all not to give much weight to Edmund's 10.2 time.

MT has never been a paragon of accuracy. Like David E Davis' Automobile, MT has never trusted timer measurements if it didn't back what they wanted to say. That lead to the data and 'car of the year' frauds that many of you do not remember.
Wait til R&T and C&D publish their results before crowing. Here we matched an 08 Fit Sport and 09 Sport side by side accelerating from 30 mph and 40 mph and the 09 lost every time.
 
Old Sep 27, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #14  
Arisenfury's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,398
From: CT
IIRC Motor Trend also put the GD3 in the 8 seconds as well.

To be quite honest though, worrying about which economy car can do 0-60 in the faster amount of time is rather silly. Even a 1 second difference after that long wait is barely perceivable to the average person.
 
Old Sep 27, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #15  
SK Ninja's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 22
From: Canada
this is impressive number indeed. vw rabbit 2.5 with MT does 8.5 for 0-60..
r18 civic with MT does 7.7 so, it's still slower than civic but probably one of the fastest econo box out there.

1 sec difference in 0-60 dash is like, 3~4 car length BTW.
 
Old Sep 27, 2008 | 03:10 PM
  #16  
CrystalFiveMT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,662
From: New York State
Originally Posted by Arisenfury
IIRC Motor Trend also put the GD3 in the 8 seconds as well.

To be quite honest though, worrying about which economy car can do 0-60 in the faster amount of time is rather silly. Even a 1 second difference after that long wait is barely perceivable to the average person.
No, that was Car and Driver. They did 8.7 with the GD3 manual. Motor Trends times are usually a little slower than C&D's. I had no doubt that the GE8 would be at least as quick as the GD3 - more power everywhere in the rev band, shorter gearing and only 44 lbs. heavier.
 
Old Sep 27, 2008 | 04:07 PM
  #17  
sofa king's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 82
From: Tucson, AZ
who cares, its a fit.
 
Old Sep 27, 2008 | 04:30 PM
  #18  
fliptwister's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 99
From: Ripon, WI
Originally Posted by mahout
Here we matched an 08 Fit Sport and 09 Sport side by side accelerating from 30 mph and 40 mph and the 09 lost every time.
Where is "here" and who is "we"?

Thanks!
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 01:21 AM
  #19  
noxikon's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 150
From: United States
Yeah seriously.
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 05:17 AM
  #20  
L.B.'s Avatar
New Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 13
From: California
Originally Posted by sofa king
who cares, its a fit.
Right on.

I didn't buy the Fit for 0-60 times or for 1/4 miles. That's what my "other" car is for.

I bought the Fit because I needed a reliable car that could haul stuff around and be used/abused as a daily commuter (74 mile commute daily), and so far, I'm loving what the Fit can deliver on that end.

Quibbling about 0.1 or 0.5 seconds here or there seems completely pointless.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09 PM.