2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Latest Fill-Up, Amazing Gas Mileage!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
dgs's Avatar
dgs
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 232
From: Texas
Latest Fill-Up, Amazing Gas Mileage!

Last time I filled up I set the trip meter to zero. Tonight I pulled in to gas up as I have to do a lot of long distance driving tomorrow and I don't want to stop for gas. The trip meter read exactly 237 miles. My receipt said I used 6.29 gallons to fill-up. Doing the simple math yields 237/6.29 = 37.68 mpg. That is for a mix of highway and city driving, with 60% of that being highway at an average speed between 65 mph and 70 mph. I shift anywhere between 3,000 rpms up to 4,500 rpms depending on the situation, so it's not like I baby my car.

What's even more amazing is the engine just turned over 1,000 miles today and I'm getting 37.68 mpg. It will only get better as the engine breaks in more. I suspect when the car hits 5,000 miles that number might go up one mpg or two. I bet a pure highway drive would yield way into the high 40's depending on speed.

Why would anyone buy a Prius when you can buy a car like the Fit that gets very close gas mileage, and is infinitely more fun to drive? Plus it looks better too (subjective). My Fit sport has the navigation system which means it's fully loaded (minus the auto, mine is a manual). The car was $18,500. A fully loaded Prius is about $30,000. I know the Prius comes with some extra features not on the Fit but I don't think it's worth the price premium.
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 09:24 PM
  #2  
cab0053's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 942
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by dgs


Why would anyone buy a Prius when you can buy a car like the Fit that gets very close gas mileage, and is infinitely more fun to drive? Plus it looks better too (subjective). My Fit sport has the navigation system which means it's fully loaded (minus the auto, mine is a manual). The car was $18,500. A fully loaded Prius is about $30,000. I know the Prius comes with some extra features not on the Fit but I don't think it's worth the price premium.
fit>prius

(of course)
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 09:40 PM
  #3  
speedoholic's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 84
From: Concord, NC
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by cab0053
fit>prius

(of course)
And the Fit has less of an environmental impact than the Prius.
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #4  
Scaldy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 194
From: Far far away
Funny, I was just think about my great gas mileage too. Although I'm 'hypermiling' allot my last tank was 40mpg! That's by my calculations, not the car's, and it was done with 30% city / 70% highway.

For us Canadians it converts to 5.9/100L and 700kms on a full tank.

Without the hypermiling I lose around 5 mpg. I haven't calculated a tank based on 'spirited' driving yet as I'm waiting to break the car in more.
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 11:20 PM
  #5  
FireFox91's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 157
From: Tampa, FL
I just got 35.6 MPG and it was only the 2nd tank of gas ever put in the car. (I just got it 2 weeks ago.) That is mixed city and highway. I told my friend with the Toyota Tundra and his 17 MPG and he was a little jealous.
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 11:38 PM
  #6  
Kriddik's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 84
From: Miami, Florida, Miami-Dade
Yea Im driving like a douche and im gettin 31 mpg, so im a pretty happy owner
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 02:06 AM
  #7  
Neebs's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 357
From: Tucson, Az
5 Year Member
Yep, 37 mpg average with 100% city driving.
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 08:39 AM
  #8  
Kriddik's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 84
From: Miami, Florida, Miami-Dade
Originally Posted by Neebs
Yep, 37 mpg average with 100% city driving.

Sweet! I have topped out at 33 mpg city, but I live in Miami, so I cant complain.
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 10:09 AM
  #9  
ibglowin's Avatar
New Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 18
From: Lost Almost, NM
I am on my first tank still and am averaging around 37.5 MPG (MT). Mostly highway (75 MPH) and some light city stuff. This is on Winter fuel still in my area. Should be getting close to 40 MPG this Summer after break-in period is over.

You would have to drive your Prius 300,000 miles just to break even on the gas/vehicle price, then throw in the fact that the batteries will need to be replaced at some point soon......

The Fit just makes more sense and cents!
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 10:15 AM
  #10  
Dakid's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 162
From: Houston
35.25 here thats my best so far.. and thats 90% city driving
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #11  
jrlnc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 278
From: USA
Thumbs up

I'm averaging ~ 37.5 MPG overall since I got my Fit in December.

The winter fuel is crappy for mileage and the super cold temps really hurt it too! Today with much milder weather I notice that my average is going up about 3 mpg.

Once we're on summer fuel and our cars are more broken in it will be higher. I'm happy with it.
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 11:03 AM
  #12  
Virtual's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,208
From: Quebec, Canada
Originally Posted by ibglowin
...You would have to drive your Prius 300,000 miles just to break even on the gas/vehicle price, then throw in the fact that the batteries will need to be replaced at some point soon......
Not to mention that the difference in initial cost could gain interest during that time. That makes it even harder to break even, if ever.
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 02:24 PM
  #13  
Alpha Zero's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 354
From: Bay Area
Most people are averaging around 35-37mpg combined.
I'm wondering how Honda got to the 29mpg combined figure they are reporting.
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 02:36 PM
  #14  
ken_vs_ryu's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 194
From: on point
Originally Posted by Alpha Zero
Most people are averaging around 35-37mpg combined.
I'm wondering how Honda got to the 29mpg combined figure they are reporting.
I get 29mpg if I'm lucky.
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #15  
kdean101's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
From: Juneau, Alaska
Hummm Im in the middle of winter here in alaska and im only getting 25-27MPG on a full tank... with about 600miles on my car.
All this talk has got me jealous!
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #16  
Alpha Zero's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 354
From: Bay Area
Do you guys shift at 5000rpms and accelerate up from light to light?
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #17  
robodude's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 93
From: southeast US
I average around 37 mpg too. I shift early at around 2.5-3.5k rpm.
 
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 12:06 AM
  #18  
dgs's Avatar
dgs
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 232
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Alpha Zero
Most people are averaging around 35-37mpg combined.
I'm wondering how Honda got to the 29mpg combined figure they are reporting.
You know, I was thinking the same thing!

I just filled up again today, as I put 300 miles on the car between today and yesterday and the mileage dropped a little, to 35.63. But that is with a minimum speed of 75 mph on the freeway (usually at 80 mph) and a lot of city driving using my normal shift points. Additionally since it's been real hot here in Texas the past few days the A/C was on at all times. Just incredible gas mileage out of this little car.

I know the EPA changed their testing method for the 2008 model year, but something is wrong with their numbers for the FIT.
 
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 04:28 AM
  #19  
kingofpicklez's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 892
From: Cupertino, CA
how are you guys doing this!!! hahha i'm getting around 26-28 mpg, but the reason i'm guessing is cuz i'm not light on the gas and the low tire pressure light has been on for a while
 
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 06:02 AM
  #20  
jrlnc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 278
From: USA
The EPA numbers are VERY pessimistic!

Originally Posted by Alpha Zero
Most people are averaging around 35-37mpg combined.
I'm wondering how Honda got to the 29mpg combined figure they are reporting.
Even Consumer Reports says that their actual average for the car is 33 mpg, and I know that they don't drive for optimal fuel efficiency.

When I see other larger cars with really high EPA numbers, I'm very suspicious that the entire new EPA system is off.

Another thing I've noticed in general, is that in actual driving conditions reported by real drivers (see Fuel Economy) Hondas usually outperform Toyotas in actual vs EPA mpgs.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 PM.