Tekeda Cold Air Intake
#1
04-13-2009, 09:12 PM
Tekeda Cold Air Intake
Just came across this. The opening page has a vid of the GE8 making a dyno run and a claim of 4.38 hp and 5.29 tq
(TakedaUSA.com)
Figured I'd share, did a quick search and didn't come up with any hits, so enjoy
Here's the link to the Dyno sheet
(http://www.takedausa.com/content/dyn...Fit%201.5L.jpg)
(TakedaUSA.com)
Figured I'd share, did a quick search and didn't come up with any hits, so enjoy
Here's the link to the Dyno sheet
(http://www.takedausa.com/content/dyn...Fit%201.5L.jpg)
Last edited by Kyokutou23; 04-13-2009 at 09:24 PM.
#5
04-13-2009, 09:39 PM
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,804
Last free one
Lets not go down this path again please.... I don't think that I saw anywhere in his post ... that put one intake against another...
#6
04-13-2009, 10:20 PM
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,804
Thats fine and all but there are better ways of saying somethings... I.E. keeping some things to yourself and not putting down other makers stuff...even if it is .. not the better one at the time..
#7
04-13-2009, 10:53 PM
I'd rather gain a little hp and tq to gaining hp and lose tq.
#8
04-13-2009, 10:57 PM
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,804
#9
04-13-2009, 11:03 PM
daymn! Well i guess with a weaker motor, you have more ground to make up right? O yea, what kind of dyno was that again? Because the one Takeda (AFE Power) uses is MUSTANG DYNO.
If you're claiming 8hp with a dynojet... enough said.
i think your panel board members need some moderating...
yea...
If you're claiming 8hp with a dynojet... enough said.
...........................
#11
04-14-2009, 09:18 AM
I stated the facts, and my opinion. If you don't like my opinion, you can always avoid any and all of my posts------ because I will continue to do exactly the same thing---- state facts, and express my opinion. Unlike many others, my opinion is based on facts, not fiction and fantasy.
Easy now compadre. He's just trying to modirate the bashing.... you just cant go arround jumping peoples cases being a douche bag whenever you want!
#14
04-14-2009, 01:48 PM
It's nice that members post these dyno charts. It gives you a general idea of what to expect. Comparing these results is like comparing apples and oranges. NONE are corrected using SAE J1349 calculations. Unless someone does a comparison in a controlled environment with the same equipment and taking into account for test conditions, all these numbers being thrown around are biased.
Last edited by caliban10010; 04-14-2009 at 01:59 PM.
#15
04-14-2009, 01:56 PM
they also just came out iwht an intake for the 8thgen civic.
dynos seem weird and unbeleiveable results....like really unbeleiveable. i wouldnt trust anything from this company if they falsify their results like this.
lol @17whp from a short ram.
http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/bolt-...ew-intake.html
dynos seem weird and unbeleiveable results....like really unbeleiveable. i wouldnt trust anything from this company if they falsify their results like this.
lol @17whp from a short ram.
http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/bolt-...ew-intake.html
#16
04-14-2009, 03:10 PM
I like how this intake got a pretty good gain in torque. Which is what this car actually needs. You can have all the HP you want, but you really feel it when a car has some TQ in it 
+5 TQ from an intake sounds great!
Good job Takeda!
+5 TQ from an intake sounds great!
Good job Takeda!
#20
04-19-2009, 10:06 PM
I do like the fact that this intake uses the factory box's mounting point(s). I like the PRM as well but am a little to uneasy about the rubber coupler and clamp being the only thing that holds it on. I am being paranoid, I know, lol. What would have to change about this intake to make it capatable with an AT other than the fact that checking the AT fluid would be a pain in the arse.