2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2010 Fit Sport w/ Nav, not available w/ manual transmission?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-29-2009, 09:41 AM
DonkeyKong's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jackson
Posts: 28
2010 Fit Sport w/ Nav, not available w/ manual transmission?

I went to Honda's website and clicked on the 'build your own' section of the 2010 Honda Fit and noticed that they do not offer a manual transmission with the Sport with navigation. Is this correct?
 
  #2  
Old 08-29-2009, 10:05 AM
niko3257's Avatar
FitFreak GE8 DIY Guy
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Coast FLA
Posts: 1,929
looks like your right they took the manual off. they might put it back
if enough people ask for it. but i'll just be blowing smoke. the reason
they got rid of it is most likely cause there was no demand for it.
oh well what are you going to do. where in America. no one want to
drive. everyone wants to be driven.
 
  #3  
Old 08-29-2009, 10:34 AM
mike2100's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: D
Posts: 532
What I find more interesting is that you can't get VSA with a manual transmission.
 
  #4  
Old 08-29-2009, 10:40 AM
niko3257's Avatar
FitFreak GE8 DIY Guy
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Coast FLA
Posts: 1,929
Originally Posted by mike2100
What I find more interesting is that you can't get VSA with a manual transmission.


thats cause there is no manual to put it in.
 
  #5  
Old 08-29-2009, 10:43 AM
Schadenfreude's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 110
Originally Posted by mike2100
What I find more interesting is that you can't get VSA with a manual transmission.
VSA only comes with Navigation so that makes sense.
I think people smart enough to get a MT know you can get a better stand alone navigation system for a fraction of the cost.
 
  #6  
Old 08-29-2009, 10:45 AM
mike2100's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: D
Posts: 532
Yeah I get that guys (VSA requires Nav). What I am saying is that it's interesting. All the VSA complainers (the ones that want it standard) are really going to be complaining now.
 
  #7  
Old 08-29-2009, 10:55 AM
niko3257's Avatar
FitFreak GE8 DIY Guy
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Coast FLA
Posts: 1,929
oh well let them complain. it will all be over soon anyway.
they all have to be standard by 2012 was it?
 
  #8  
Old 09-01-2009, 07:46 PM
meevo's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ----
Posts: 46
No manual may be a deal breaker..
 
  #9  
Old 09-01-2009, 08:38 PM
TaffetaWhite's Avatar
Someone that spends her life on FitFreak.net
5 Year Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 1,448
  #10  
Old 09-02-2009, 07:20 PM
findude's Avatar
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 17
Originally Posted by Schadenfreude
VSA only comes with Navigation so that makes sense.
I think people smart enough to get a MT know you can get a better stand alone navigation system for a fraction of the cost.
The association between NAV and VSA is based on marketing, not technology--it doesn't make "sense" from a technical perspective.

Honda has done the same thing with the Civic. If you want VSA, you have to get an automatic.

Deal Breaker.
 
  #11  
Old 09-02-2009, 07:21 PM
meevo's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ----
Posts: 46
I mean, if I wanted to wait for the car for a year or two
 
  #12  
Old 09-02-2009, 08:34 PM
mike2100's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: D
Posts: 532
I've survived this long without VSA...
 
  #13  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:25 AM
dgs's Avatar
dgs
dgs is offline
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 232
I do not understand why Honda would eliminate the option for nav and manual transmission combo. I admit it was very difficult to find my car in that combo, but at least it was available. Not sure I would buy a Fit without the manual trans.

I'm still in disbelief Honda is pulling that stupid crap again by making a safety feature like VSA only available with an expensive option like nav. VSA should be standard on all trim lines by now. What does VSA have to do with nav, nothing!. That would be like another manufacture making anti-lock breaks only available with leather seats or something. Makes no sense whatsoever but I'm sure it's profit driven which is lame. One of the more boneheaded decisions I can recall Honda making in the past decade or so.
 
  #14  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:57 AM
fittybux's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 20
i noticed this, too, while browsing the site. is this for real? no manual transmission for the 2010 fits?
 
  #15  
Old 09-03-2009, 03:09 AM
fittybux's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 20
Originally Posted by fittybux
i noticed this, too, while browsing the site. is this for real? no manual transmission for the 2010 fits?
oh i see now...only with navigation...
 
  #16  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:07 AM
Uncle Gary's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 2,421
Well, I suspect by 2012, you won't be able to get a manual transmission anything. We now have a whole generation of Americans who have never driven a manual and are afraid to learn.

Why should car companies even bother to offer manual transmissions when something like 95% of new cars sold in America are automatics? After all, automatics add another $800-$1000 to the price of a car, and a good chunk of that is extra profit for the automaker and the dealer.

I'm surprised you can still by a manual transmission in any car. Having to shift gears just distracts drivers from:

talking on the cell phone,
texting,
drinking coffee,
yelling at the kids,
playing with the navigation screen,
etc. etc.
 
  #17  
Old 09-03-2009, 10:06 AM
IBJanky's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 238
I personally prefer the AT over the MT. It's just an econobox commuter anyway.

Now, if I had a sportscar, then I'd definitely get a MT.

myke
 
  #18  
Old 09-03-2009, 10:55 AM
cab0053's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 942
Originally Posted by Uncle Gary
Well, I suspect by 2012, you won't be able to get a manual transmission anything. We now have a whole generation of Americans who have never driven a manual and are afraid to learn.

Why should car companies even bother to offer manual transmissions when something like 95% of new cars sold in America are automatics? After all, automatics add another $800-$1000 to the price of a car, and a good chunk of that is extra profit for the automaker and the dealer.

I'm surprised you can still by a manual transmission in any car. Having to shift gears just distracts drivers from:

talking on the cell phone,
texting,
drinking coffee,
yelling at the kids,
playing with the navigation screen,
etc. etc.
As a responsible American I have taught my ex girlfriend (while we were dating) how to drive stick. She now drives a manual golf (the golf part is not my fault). Also, taught the current girlfriend how, but she needs a lot of practice and I can't afford a new clutch quite yet.
 
  #19  
Old 09-03-2009, 01:57 PM
Schadenfreude's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 110
Originally Posted by IBJanky
I personally prefer the AT over the MT. It's just an econobox commuter anyway.
As you advertise your 31.9 mpg average to everyone.
 
  #20  
Old 09-03-2009, 08:38 PM
SportMTNavi's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 561
We ordered our '09 about a year ago. There were no Sport Navis anywhere with a manual transmission. I believe that Honda built all of them to order on two days at the end of November. They just don't sell them.

I drove a Sport Navi with auto and it was fine, although I thought the transmission was busy shifting all the time on the hilly highway with the cruise on. The paddle shifters were fun to play with, too.

My wife just would not hear of an automatic transmission on a fun little car. Hence the stick. No regrets there.

VSA: Valuable safety equipment.

Cheers.
 


Quick Reply: 2010 Fit Sport w/ Nav, not available w/ manual transmission?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 PM.