First Drive: 2011 Honda CR-Z — Autoblog

 

i would if i didnt need the cargo room.

im really pushing my wife to get the cr-z when the lease for the G coupe expires.

 

um...

I don't know if I like it or not =/

 

nope, unimpressed by CR-Z.

 

The only thing I like about the CR-Z is the 6 speed transmission.
I would not give up the space and 4 doors of my Fit.

 

Not likely... I need a back seat for weekends and such when I have my kids.

But, for the Fiesta, or a Clubman? Yeah, I could be tempted... But I would much rather just pay this thing off, have it as my grocery-getter / daily-driver, and spend the money on something two wheeled instead. The Fit is more than enough fun to keep me entertained when I'm stuck in a cage, but should be dependable and economical for at least the next 10 years or so.

 

My sentiments exactly - I'm no lover of crotch rockets though.

 

Not a chance. Honda seems to be loosing its way. They kill the S2000, and bring out a great looking CR-Z, that has the heart of a marshmallow. Nothing in the line-up is inspiring. Dull and boring, sorta of like the old Chevy Biscayne. The Fit is the only one I like now.

 

No reason to...the Fit is just as sporty as the CR-Z. Don't believe me....check the figures. More money for almost same performance and lack of rear seat and cargo... no thanks.

Both came from Motor Trend...

2011 Honda CR-Z by MT
Base price $19,900-$21,500 (est) Vehicle layout Front-engine, FWD, 2-pass, 2-door, hatchback Engine 1.5L/112-hp/107-lb-ft SOHC 16-valve I-4, plus 13-hp/58-lb-ft electric motor; comb output 122 hp/123-128 lb-ft Transmission 6-speed manual Curb weight (f/r dist) 2544 lb (58/42%) Wheelbase 95.9 in Length x width x height 160.6 x 68.5 x 54.9 in 0-60 mph 8.3 sec Quarter mile 16.4 sec @ 83.6 mph Braking, 60-0 mph 122 ft Lateral acceleration 0.84 g (avg) MT Figure Eight 27.5 sec @ 0.60 g (avg) EPA city/hwy fuel econ 31/37 mpg CO2 emissions 0.58 lb/mile On sale in U.S. August. 2010
2011 Honda CR-Z U.S. Spec First Drive - Motor Trend

09 Fit Sport by MT
Base price $16,730 Price as tested $18,580 Drivetrain Front engine, FWD Engine 1.5L/117-hp/106-lb-ft SOHC inline 4 Transmission 5-speed manual Curb weight (dist f/r) 2521 lb (62/38%) Wheelbase 98.4 in Length x width x height 161.6 x 66.7 x 60.0 in 0-60 mph 8.3 sec Quarter mile 16.3 @ 84.9 mph Braking, 60-0 mph 138 ft Lateral acceleration 0.81 g (avg) EPA city/hwy fuel econ 27/33 mpg CO2 emissions 0.66 lb/mile
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...omy_price.html

To add salt to the wound, when reviews read like this...
"Ignore the hybrid system's configuration buttons (Eco, Normal, Sport; they alter throttle response and the electric motor's assist level) on the dash, and the car reminds you of a sleepy, sedated Fit."
From Jalopnik
http://jalopnik.com/5566437/2011-hon...irst-drive-wip
I'm just not impressed.

I like the looks of the CR-Z but....
I think I will keep my Fit

 

I liked the look of the concept version; after seeing the production one I don't see anything interesting about it. Love the fit and I'd stick with it for sure

 

simple answer is no. why? they made the good looking concept into a horrible lookingusdm production model.

 

Well... um, if nothing else, the weight distribution looks nice. Not quite 50/50, but closer.

Anyone else think that sucker would be a LOT more fun with rear-wheel drive and a 2.4L engine from the Accord?

 

Even just adding a decent turbo to its existing L15A would suffice...and ditch the electric parts of the IMA hybrid system altogether. Keep the engine light is what I say

Given turbocharging's resurgence among carmakers as a way of extracting max output from small engines surely it would make sense? I mean, VW is already punching out 170++ HP from its twin-charged 1.4.

 

Nope,no CR-Z for me. Why? same gas milage,no major HP increase,no cargo space,just doesn't fit what I need in a car.

Read an articule that says Honda is going strictly green in 3-5 years. Dropping SUVs,sportier versions,and concentrating on small fuel effectient hybrid & electric cars. Looks like they are starting that program with newer hybrid models of late.

PaFitter

 

no way I prefer to wait for the Jazz Hybrid

 

I like it but I'll stick with the Fit.

 

It depends how much I would financially lose if I sell my fit but I would definitely do it.

I love the 6speed MT and the more upscale looks of the crz compared to the jazz. I also love that its a hybrid. That opens door for more fuel efficient driving. Slightly disappointed in the performance though. I couldn't care any more for the cargo space. I never use more than 10% of it anyway.

 

Good golly. CRZ has a Fit engine (also shared with the Insight), Fit suspension (also shared with the Insight), weighs more than a Fit (!!!!), costs more too.

I wish I could like it, but I can't. Hybridization and shrinkage of the Fit could have combined to make a really sporty little hot rod, but it didn't.

I suspect they'll sell like hotcakes though.

 

The CRZ is the upscale, coupe version of the fit that I always wanted and that I always complained about when I drive my fit. This is a hot hatch that you would really enjoy driving in the mountains or just cruising around.

It is really too bad about the performance though.

 

+1

Plus why would I pay more for a very poor CR-X (god I loved that car!) wannabe with less room and performance that the Fit. I mean the Fit can be forgiven for having a rear torsion beam based on it's class, but the CR-Z?

What the hell is wrong with Honda? I think this will be a serious mis-step for their performance image.