2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

lighter wheels = less MPG at 60+MPH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-01-2010, 06:18 AM
Foxjordan22's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 14
lighter wheels = less MPG at 60+MPH

i switched from the stock 16x6 wheels weighting around 18lbs to konig feather 16x7 at only 15lbs. i kept the same stock tire. around a 12lb savings total. accel and braking were noticeably improved, but anything over 60mph i am getting less mpg than with the stock wheels. the only reason i can think of is the konigs have a 40 offset and with the added inch of wheel they are flush with the fender. so is it that the tire and wheel now closer to the air traveling around the fit is causing aerodynamic disturbance and droping the mpg. or mabey cruising at higher speeds the heavier wheel helps maintain speed better? thanks for all input.
 
  #2  
Old 12-01-2010, 01:47 PM
Jensen Healy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Winless City
Posts: 305
Originally Posted by Foxjordan22
the only reason i can think of is the konigs have a 40 offset and with the added inch of wheel they are flush with the fender.
Skinnier ties usually get more MPG than fat tires, so I can buy your extra inch being part of the problem there.
 
  #3  
Old 12-01-2010, 02:00 PM
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 4,424
Originally Posted by Jensen Healy
Skinnier ties usually get more MPG than fat tires, so I can buy your extra inch being part of the problem there.

Yup, rolling friction is a bitch.
 
  #4  
Old 12-01-2010, 02:01 PM
ztyhurst's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 69
He says he kept the same tire, or that would be my thought as well. I think I would buy the rolling momentum of heavier wheels theory.
 
  #5  
Old 12-01-2010, 02:26 PM
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 4,424
Originally Posted by ztyhurst
He says he kept the same tire, or that would be my thought as well. I think I would buy the rolling momentum of heavier wheels theory.
Ah, missed that, haha.

Well going from a 6" rim to a 7" will make for a smaller overall diameter on the same tire because of the change in the angle of the sidewall, requiring the engine to spin faster to achieve the same speed. Also, if the wheel is flush with the car this would create smoother flow over the side of the car...

As far as the heavier wheel returning better mileage.. Remember less inertia to overcome makes it easier for the engine to turn as well as less total mass push along. Both of which would dictate less fuel is necessary to cover the same distance over the same period of time, and would make for even less fuel required during acceleration.

Tire wear also contributes to the shorter effective final ratio at the road, also dictating higher rpm for a given speed @ the same throttle position = more fuel per unit time.

The OP never states specifically how much his fuel economy suffered...
 

Last edited by DiamondStarMonsters; 12-01-2010 at 02:29 PM.
  #6  
Old 12-01-2010, 03:59 PM
Foxjordan22's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 14
Stock tires. I agree on shorter height due to stretching the tire on a wider rim. Lost about 2mpg average highway. Gained 3-4 city driving.
 
  #7  
Old 12-01-2010, 04:24 PM
Jodele's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 589
Offset is your biggest enemy! Not because of aero, but because of the large mechanical arm you’ve just put on. That extra offset is like putting a cheater bar on your wrench…only you are putting all that leverage on your bearings. The faster you go, the more it pushes…and loads the bearings.

Tires are all secondary...aero in last place...for this instance.
 
  #8  
Old 12-01-2010, 04:27 PM
ztyhurst's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 69
Oh yeah... stretched tires for a shorter final gear ratio. I'll buy that one too...

I guess we don't have to send this one into mythbusters after all.
 
  #9  
Old 12-01-2010, 05:50 PM
Texas Coyote's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Anderson County Texas
Posts: 7,388
Originally Posted by Jodele
Offset is your biggest enemy! Not because of aero, but because of the large mechanical arm you’ve just put on. That extra offset is like putting a cheater bar on your wrench…only you are putting all that leverage on your bearings. The faster you go, the more it pushes…and loads the bearings.

Tires are all secondary...aero in last place...for this instance.
What you are saying about offset sounds crazy as hell... There may be truth in what you said based on the sounds I have been hearing when I kick in the clutch pedal that I didn't hear before I put wheels with more offset on my car. I just noticed it today for the first time and was thinking about it before I read your response.
 
  #10  
Old 12-01-2010, 08:56 PM
Foxjordan22's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 14
i noticed this noise as well. i attributed it to stretching the tires. this is the only car i noticed more road noise on when i changed wheels and didn't change tires.
 
  #11  
Old 12-01-2010, 09:45 PM
Foxjordan22's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 14
i think i may switch wheels to SSR type F. 16x5.5" +38 offset with stock tires. that should put me only 3mm wider than the stock wheel and tire at 6" wide with 53mm offset. but at 10.1 lbs each i will save about 32 lbs total wheel weight.
 
  #12  
Old 12-02-2010, 12:04 AM
ThEvil0nE's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,626
konig to ssr... now you're talking
 
  #13  
Old 12-02-2010, 11:42 AM
Texas Coyote's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Anderson County Texas
Posts: 7,388
Lighter wheels make a big difference in improving your car in ways that no other modification is going to but they aren't going to improve mileage at sustained highway speeds unless there are lots of hills on your route.....The weight of the wheels are like flywheels in that they take power to get up to speed but the rotating mass maintains speed longer when coasting.. Heavier wheels coast farther before slowing to a stop and can improve fuel mileage for someone that coast a long distance to a stop when hyper mileing.... In stop and go driving where hyper mile driving isn't used the lighter wheel/tire setup is going to award you with better fuel mileage and response when accelerating to speed from a stop and when changing speed up or down in heavy traffic or just driving in a carefree spirited manner.
 
  #14  
Old 12-02-2010, 06:58 PM
Klasse Act's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Woodridge Illinois USA
Posts: 1,283
I have Konig Forwards (16x7) w/40mm offset and then added 205/50's to them and have to say my mileage going back home to Detroit afterwards went from 38 mpg to 39 mpg and going home I used to get 43 mpg and it went down to 41.3 mpg, but that could be from anything from wind, fuel, etc.

How about a pic of those wheels on your car BTW
 
  #15  
Old 12-02-2010, 07:37 PM
solbrothers's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vallejo, Ca
Posts: 7,343
bullshit. theres so many factors regarding mpg that you couldnt measure the difference between the two different wheels.
 
  #16  
Old 12-02-2010, 07:47 PM
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 4,424
Originally Posted by solbrothers
bullshit. theres so many factors regarding mpg that you couldnt measure the difference between the two different wheels.

Originally Posted by Klasse Act
my mileage going back home to Detroit afterwards went from 38 mpg to 39 mpg and going home I used to get 43 mpg and it went down to 41.3 mpg, but that could be from anything from wind, fuel, etc.


Just sayin'
 
  #17  
Old 12-02-2010, 07:50 PM
solbrothers's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vallejo, Ca
Posts: 7,343
yeah man. air temp definitely plays a big role. in the winter i average 45mpg, summer 55mpg.
 
  #18  
Old 12-02-2010, 07:56 PM
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 4,424
Originally Posted by solbrothers
yeah man. air temp definitely plays a big role. in the winter i average 45mpg, summer 55mpg.

Wow, really? How? I'm quite jealous.

Do you have a sail?
 
  #19  
Old 12-02-2010, 09:21 PM
Foxjordan22's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 14
Originally Posted by solbrothers
yeah man. air temp definitely plays a big role. in the winter i average 45mpg, summer 55mpg.
what. I've only had my car for 2 months the best average ive got was 37mpg. WTF. I havn't noticed a difference between 70-90 degrees.
 
  #20  
Old 12-02-2010, 09:25 PM
Foxjordan22's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 14
Originally Posted by Klasse Act

How about a pic of those wheels on your car BTW
I just put the mugen front lip on tonight. Tomorrow I will get some pics up. The tire still sticks out of the wider front lip but nowhere near as bad as without.
 


Quick Reply: lighter wheels = less MPG at 60+MPH



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:08 PM.