will this header down pipe whatever u wanna call it work on the ge8? click here

 

It says 2009+, so it should.

 

yea i dunno bout that lol...it says "FOR YOU CRZ" in the description

 

damn 5hp+ and 10lb tq+... shizz i want in on this action if it fits on our ge's.

 

contact them? I sure am interested

 

I know the owner of Corsport- I'll see what he knows about it- Mark W.

Edit- sent him a message- I'll post up when I hear back from him Mark W.

 

According to Tai (owner of Corsport), it should fit the GE8 as well- Mark W.

 

Someone try this out. Is this a b-pipe

 

is this similar to WR?

 

WR?

And yes, it's a B-pipe- it replaces the catalytic converter- it's also known as a test pipe- Mark W.

 

WR

that's pretty expensive for just a straight pipe/cat-delete... is that made of aluminized steel? but on the brighter side... the b-spec FIT has a cat-delete exhaust, so that would definitely yield hp/tq benefit.

 

Soooo....wr header plus this.....= ¿¿¿

 

^^ I do believe the WR is a down pipe + cat-delete

 

so WR down pipe + t1r mid pipe + axle back exhaust = full header to exhaust free flow master setup?

 

thaduke. since you know the owner you should try to get a group buy set up. im sure if this was a bit cheaper a lot more people would jump on it

 

Sure- I'll ask him- he's a pretty cool guy, so I think we may have some luck- Mark W.

 

No dice on the group buy- sorry Mark W.

 

K so then this will delete the cats right?

 

So it would be better to just get the WR 'header' instead of this cat-delete? I know there was a post/thread about the WR header about how much power it made, but I can't find it (doh)
Maybe we can compare their dynos?


https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/2nd-...der-ge8-3.html

Found it!

 

I'd have to believe that the "race" header would add more power up top, but the reduced restriction would cut out some low end torque. While a test pipe would do the same, it wouldn't do as much (depending on how restrictive the OEM header is), and might make power delivery more peaky, due to possible peaks and valleys in power delivery, which (assuming WR did a good job in development, although I wouldn't bet on it, especially for $375!) a decent long-tube header would eliminate.

As for WR, I've used a couple of their products on customer cars, and one intake on my own Subaru a few years back. Their stuff is rice defined. Sure, it fits and does SOME good, but it's more bling than go. I was NEVER impressed- the only reason I'd use their stuff is because there wasn't an off-the-shelf solution available from a better company, and the cost and headache of fabbing something up wasn't worth it- Mark W.