2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Cold Air Intake & Fuel Efficiency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 08:13 PM
  #1  
SharkFart's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
New Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4
From: X
Cold Air Intake & Fuel Efficiency

Has anyone installed a cold air intake on their fit? How much of a boost in efficiency did it yield for you?
 
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 10:24 PM
  #2  
bl_arias's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 38
From: Southern Arizona
I installed the K&N intake on my GE8 M/T. I will say that my car is definitely more responsive, takes hills better, and sounds better than stock, but as far as a boost in efficiency I would say it was fairly small, maybe 1-2mpg. But it is hard to say because I also installed the HKS exhaust at the same time and the car breaking in could have played a part in it as well. Right now I average just above q3440 mpg, that is about 50/50 highway/city driving, 50 miles round trip every day. Don't know if I was any help or if I really answered your question, but I am sure there are others on here that can provide you with better results/numbers to go with their installs.

And just to make clear, the K&N intake is a short ram intake not a true cold air intake.
 

Last edited by bl_arias; Apr 21, 2011 at 09:06 PM.
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 11:59 AM
  #3  
Farther's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 178
From: State of Jefferson
Originally Posted by bl_arias
I average just above q3440 mpg.
Ok I will bite, what does this mean?
 
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 01:23 PM
  #4  
bl_arias's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 38
From: Southern Arizona
Originally Posted by Farther
Ok I will bite, what does this mean?
Well, to be completely honest with you, I have no idea. It was supposed to be just 40. I don't even remember that being there when I posted the reply. Getting old is a bummer.
 
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 04:03 PM
  #5  
Klasse Act's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,283
From: Woodridge Illinois USA
Arrow

I've had my K&N Typhoon on for over 19k and the only difference is in the winter time where the car has added fuel, I'm told by a VERY reliable source, but the mileage isn't enough for me to worry about it. I've counteracted this by running BP Ultimate fuel and haven't looked back.

Now I'm just waiting for the weather to completely turn the corner and see what mileage will be once its over 60 everyday. Right now though, I'm getting 35 mpg with my car and its got mods, other mods too
 
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 08:18 PM
  #6  
Coppatop85's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 61
From: USA
Shouldn't a cold air intake REDUCE fuel efficiency? It forces cooler air through which makes the fuel/oxygen denser, causing you to burn more. CAI's are for power, not efficiency. I think people get WARM air intakes to boost fuel economy.
 
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 08:50 PM
  #7  
SilverBullet's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,304
From: Illinois
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Coppatop85
Shouldn't a cold air intake REDUCE fuel efficiency? It forces cooler air through which makes the fuel/oxygen denser, causing you to burn more. CAI's are for power, not efficiency. I think people get WARM air intakes to boost fuel economy.
Yes and no. If you drive the car like you stoled it and enjoy the power yes more air needs more fuel. The mpg comes from getting to speed faster using less rpm and as long as knock isn't present mpg should go up a little. Warm air can cause knock and more losses from evaporated fuel. The idea is that the fuel is cool and when sprayed in to a dense cool air stream and the heat of the pistons evaporate the fuel in the chamber cooling the pistons and more power is produced using less rpm and fuel.
 
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 10:18 AM
  #8  
SilverBullet's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,304
From: Illinois
5 Year Member
Just want to add that in open loop it will run leaner with a cold air intake and thats where the extra power comes. More air in needs exhaust for more air out.
 
Old May 1, 2011 | 09:10 AM
  #9  
Nukedog's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 87
From: Jax, FL
All the other vehicles i have had them on it reduced city mpg and gained on highway mpg. Also usually loose TQ down low but gain a bit up high. This is referring to stock motors of course.
 
Old May 1, 2011 | 08:13 PM
  #10  
foglght's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
From: Saline, Mi
The whole idea really is the fact that to lower your fuel consumption your engine needs to be making more torque at a given rpm for you to back off the gas pedal. If that is happening by installing a cold air intake, then you get the increases. Given that most engines aren't seeing enough of a temperature delta, they probably aren't doing anything other than making noise and draining your wallet.

Now, at WOT.....different story, but that has nothing to do with fuel economy.

You want gains, look at reducing the leak paths in your frontal area.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Myxalplyx
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
0
Apr 15, 2015 08:58 PM
Orcshine101
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
22
Mar 22, 2013 11:55 AM
xcurt15
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
33
Nov 1, 2007 04:33 PM
zombi
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
2
Jun 21, 2007 02:35 PM
ride_the_pony69
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
0
May 22, 2007 11:24 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 AM.