Does anyone have Dyno Numbers for GK5
#2
I've been on here for years. I have not seen any, except from those you have mentioned (On the GK5 platform anyways). I have CVT so never bothered to dyno anything. Only care for 1/4 mile track before and after numbers anyways. Good luck!
#3
Dyno numbers
I had 95 hp at the wheels stock, today I put in right about 112 hp which is a 17 percent increase. I know I should be happy about that but I was hoping for more. I have the hps cold air intake, rv6 downpipe with cat, maxboore throttle body, ktuner, and hks axle back exhaust. I have seen numbers with just ktuner at 121 hp. I did have a problem today getting full traction control off.
#4
I had 95 hp at the wheels stock, today I put in right about 112 hp which is a 17 percent increase. I know I should be happy about that but I was hoping for more. I have the hps cold air intake, rv6 downpipe with cat, maxboore throttle body, ktuner, and hks axle back exhaust. I have seen numbers with just ktuner at 121 hp. I did have a problem today getting full traction control off.
How far do you intend on taking your modifications? You have a manual transmission I assume since you were able to get a clean dyno run.
Want more power, acceleration and/or speed, there are a few more things you could do.
1) Lightweight wheel/tire. I was able to reduce my wheel weight down from 33lbs to 24lbs per wheel,
2) Lighweight NST pulley. It shaved off 2lbs from the stock one.
3) Deltacam camshaft. I have a set installed but can't take advantage of the extra power that may be available because the Ktuner will not raise the rev limit on a CVT tranny. If you have a manual tranny, it should work well foe you.
This is exciting. Thanks for posting.
#5
FINALLY!!! Congrats on your dyno run. Great numbers.
How far do you intend on taking your modifications? You have a manual transmission I assume since you were able to get a clean dyno run.
Want more power, acceleration and/or speed, there are a few more things you could do.
1) Lightweight wheel/tire. I was able to reduce my wheel weight down from 33lbs to 24lbs per wheel,
2) Lighweight NST pulley. It shaved off 2lbs from the stock one.
3) Deltacam camshaft. I have a set installed but can't take advantage of the extra power that may be available because the Ktuner will not raise the rev limit on a CVT tranny. If you have a manual tranny, it should work well foe you.
This is exciting. Thanks for posting.
How far do you intend on taking your modifications? You have a manual transmission I assume since you were able to get a clean dyno run.
Want more power, acceleration and/or speed, there are a few more things you could do.
1) Lightweight wheel/tire. I was able to reduce my wheel weight down from 33lbs to 24lbs per wheel,
2) Lighweight NST pulley. It shaved off 2lbs from the stock one.
3) Deltacam camshaft. I have a set installed but can't take advantage of the extra power that may be available because the Ktuner will not raise the rev limit on a CVT tranny. If you have a manual tranny, it should work well foe you.
This is exciting. Thanks for posting.
#7
The US market fits share the same motor as the rest of the world's (including japan's) RS trim level (L15B1). alternates being:
....so this is likely the same results expected in the us gk's manual lx/ex trims... my butt-dyno agrees anyway...
- 1.2 L L12B I4
- 1.3 L L13B Earth Dreams I4
- 1.5 L L15A SOHC I4
- 1.5 L L15B DOHC Earth Dreams I4[54]
- 1.5 L L15Z SOHC I4
....so this is likely the same results expected in the us gk's manual lx/ex trims... my butt-dyno agrees anyway...
Last edited by knope; 04-13-2021 at 11:12 AM. Reason: typo
#8
The CVT versions of the JDM Fit RS put down 125 WHP on a dynojet. We tuned 4 of these models since late last year and all put down same numbers without a tune.
When tuned the CVT cars make 132-135 WHP in S mode and 138-140 WHP in paddle shift mode on fully stock cars.
When tuned the CVT cars make 132-135 WHP in S mode and 138-140 WHP in paddle shift mode on fully stock cars.
#12
interested to see your results, just installed a rv6 catless pipe and hks axleback. Soon will be adding the same intake. ktuner should arove in the next couple days.. and I'm assuming that the stock RS in Japan making 130whp is due to them using a much higher octane then here in usa.
#14
#17
Dyno #'s after HKS install
interested to see your results, just installed a rv6 catless pipe and hks axleback. Soon will be adding the same intake. ktuner should arove in the next couple days.. and I'm assuming that the stock RS in Japan making 130whp is due to them using a much higher octane then here in usa.
#18
Did you ever get a tune? If so, what were the results?
#19
nice numbers ... my butt-dyno tells me i'm somewhere around 120 before heatsoak.
#20
Unfortunately my engine got damaged last year, possible oil burning issue. Sourced one from the US(mileage was pretty high on it) and its back up and running. Power figures on that one are a bit lower than expected after the tune at 136HP and 118ft/lb.
Also sourced a down pipe from Max Racing out of Malaysia. The EGR port needed to be modified as they use the L15A in south Asia instead of the L15B
Also Comparing stats from Different dynos as well. The first graph posted with the 129HP figure is a very hot Dyno the 2nd one afterwards has way better ventilation, I'm yet to go back to the 2nd Dyno as its a bit far from where I live.
Also sourced a down pipe from Max Racing out of Malaysia. The EGR port needed to be modified as they use the L15A in south Asia instead of the L15B
Also Comparing stats from Different dynos as well. The first graph posted with the 129HP figure is a very hot Dyno the 2nd one afterwards has way better ventilation, I'm yet to go back to the 2nd Dyno as its a bit far from where I live.
Last edited by CJDJ; 09-15-2022 at 10:29 AM.