3rd Generation (2015+) Say hello to the newest member of the Fit family. 3rd Generation specific talk and questions here.

2015 Fit Finalist for M/T COTY and All-Star in Automobile.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 05:57 PM
  #1  
exl500's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,443
From: Dunedin, Florida
5 Year Member
2015 Fit Finalist for M/T COTY and All-Star in Automobile.

Here's the links from this proud daddy:


2015 Motor Trend Car of the Year Contenders, Finalists - Motor Trend
Honda Fit: 2015 AUTOMOBILE All-Star
 
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 06:46 PM
  #2  
DArkk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 342
From: Modesto, CA
5 Year Member
Love the comment about the engine is loud as a mad blender. lol

Seriously I didn't find the engine noise too much of an issue.
 
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 06:54 PM
  #3  
exl500's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,443
From: Dunedin, Florida
5 Year Member
Nor do I. I think it sounds fine.
 
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 11:12 AM
  #4  
SR45's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 426
From: Dunedin, Florida
Sound is a tad less than the 2011 Fit I had, so no big deal to me. Wonder why they didn't mention this or were they just itching for something to bad mouth again ?
 
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 12:45 PM
  #5  
economicon's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 46
From: Canada
Originally Posted by DArkk
Love the comment about the engine is loud as a mad blender. lol

Seriously I didn't find the engine noise too much of an issue.
I don't think engine noise is really an issue, but I think the reviewer mentioned more about the sound of the engine itself, not the way we hear the engine from the cabin. The cabin is pretty quiet, quieter than my old Civic (incl. engine noise, wind noise, road/tire noise), so if you owned smaller Hondas before this new Fit, it is a good amount of improvement.

But the new DI DOHC Earth Dreams growls a bit different, it's not as unpleasant as Subaru's boxer engine growls, but it has a noticeably different engine note than the older, non-DI SOHC Hondas. It doesn't sound as 'sweet' when you rev it past the 4000 RPM. I don't know why (I'm not a mechanic). I miss the engine sound of my old Civic already (as much as I miss the manual trans of it).
 
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 03:54 PM
  #6  
m_x's Avatar
m_x
Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 334
From: Florida, USA
EWWW! It got beaten by a Golf?! I don't care what anybody says about German engineering or blah blah blah. I test drove a Golf, Mazda 3, Chevy Sonic, Nissan Versa Note, Prius C and the Fit (which I bought). I drove the Golf first and right then and there, even with nothing to compare to, I thought it left a lot to be desired. The interior is just bland, there is no interior storage AND it wasn't even great to drive. The Mazda was way more fun and like $5k less. Plus, I've had crap experience with VW's in the past two years.

Fit FTW!!
 
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 05:04 PM
  #7  
GeorgeL's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,545
From: SoCal, CA
I haven't considered VW since their incident with defective coil packs that failed between 25K and 50K miles. Audi owners with the packs had theirs replaced free of charge as part of a voluntary recall. VW owners with the same packs had to wait until the packs failed, stranding them. Only then would VW replace the packs and only if it was within warranty. If you got a slightly better pack that lasted past the warranty you were out of luck and had to shell out $400.

The only real VWs have the engine in back.
 
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 10:09 PM
  #8  
NotBlake's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 178
From: GA
[rant]

What really frustrates me about automotive journalism is that most flat out ignore historical reliability/dependability data when analyzing cars. I think it's really unfair to the consumer who may buy a car off of Motor Trend's recommendation.

I understand that being a new car, they can only really make substantiated claims based on test elements of the vehicle which can be measured in short time and can be expected to represent all similar cars, but completely ignoring that VW is consistently ranked in the bottom third of most reliability surveys seems disingenuous and a disservice to their (MT's) customers, their subscribers.

And even worse than ignoring poor reliability, the fact that they seem to ignore the benefits of a mark with historical above-average reliability encourages brands to throw development dollars that could be spent on making a longer lasting product, towards making a more polished, but ultimately worse product.

Seems like the best effect could be had by using JD/CR data as a test for the claims made by automotive journalists. So let them talk all they want about the fabulous new Genesis, but ground that in the knowledge that Hyundai was the 5th worst brand in JD's most recent customer survey.

[/rant]
 
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 11:12 PM
  #9  
mike410b's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7,619
From: .
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by NotBlake
[rant]

What really frustrates me about automotive journalism is that most flat out ignore historical reliability/dependability data when analyzing cars. I think it's really unfair to the consumer who may buy a car off of Motor Trend's recommendation.

I understand that being a new car, they can only really make substantiated claims based on test elements of the vehicle which can be measured in short time and can be expected to represent all similar cars, but completely ignoring that VW is consistently ranked in the bottom third of most reliability surveys seems disingenuous and a disservice to their (MT's) customers, their subscribers.

And even worse than ignoring poor reliability, the fact that they seem to ignore the benefits of a mark with historical above-average reliability encourages brands to throw development dollars that could be spent on making a longer lasting product, towards making a more polished, but ultimately worse product.

Seems like the best effect could be had by using JD/CR data as a test for the claims made by automotive journalists. So let them talk all they want about the fabulous new Genesis, but ground that in the knowledge that Hyundai was the 5th worst brand in JD's most recent customer survey.

[/rant]
Both cars are flawed. Yes? Yes.

The 2015 Fit is not impressive enough to win the awards, whether it lasts or not is also entirely unknown. This is a new factory, workforce, etc.
 
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 10:17 AM
  #10  
GeorgeL's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,545
From: SoCal, CA
Originally Posted by NotBlake
[rant]

What really frustrates me about automotive journalism is that most flat out ignore historical reliability/dependability data when analyzing cars. I think it's really unfair to the consumer who may buy a car off of Motor Trend's recommendation.
Umm, the name of the magazine is Motor Trend. Their focus is on what is trendy and current, not durability.

If you want a focus on durability, read Consumer Reports.
 
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 11:30 AM
  #11  
Santiad's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 824
From: Atlanta, Georgia
engine noise

I always dismiss any critique of engine noise until I've had a chance to hear it myself.....one man's noise is another's symphony and I like the sound my 09 makes around 4k...it's a hum and buzz of efficiency!

They must have been spoiled by the Tesla and other cars with active noise cancellation....
 
Old Nov 20, 2014 | 05:55 AM
  #12  
NotBlake's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 178
From: GA
Originally Posted by GeorgeL
Umm, the name of the magazine is Motor Trend. Their focus is on what is trendy and current, not durability.

If you want a focus on durability, read Consumer Reports.
That would be fine if the article was Trendy Car of the Year. But it isn't, it's Car of the Year, full stop. They are recommending a car from a brand with a history of unreliability as the best new car of 2014.
 
Old Nov 20, 2014 | 10:52 AM
  #13  
Scotty2h's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 32
From: Toronto, ON
5 Year Member
I looked long and hard at the 2015 Golf. It ended up being a little over $3000 more expensive off the lot, which on an economy car, I found excessive. Nice car for sure, but not $3000 nicer. That'll buy my gas until I sell the Fit.
 
Old Nov 20, 2014 | 04:47 PM
  #14  
GeorgeL's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,545
From: SoCal, CA
Originally Posted by NotBlake
That would be fine if the article was Trendy Car of the Year. But it isn't, it's Car of the Year, full stop. They are recommending a car from a brand with a history of unreliability as the best new car of 2014.
They picked the car that most impressed them. If I were to get out of a 130HP Fit and into a 170HP Golf that I wasn't paying for I'd probably pick the Golf as well.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ck42
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
35
Jan 4, 2020 04:35 PM
AFittingName
3rd Generation (2015+)
6
Sep 24, 2015 01:17 PM
Ryan2020
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
18
Jan 29, 2013 11:03 AM
jgaepi
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
10
Sep 5, 2009 01:13 AM
KentuckyFit
General Fit Talk
5
Jun 18, 2007 09:54 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.