3rd Generation (2015+) Say hello to the newest member of the Fit family. 3rd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Completed our first 2000+ mile roadtrip

Old Mar 26, 2015 | 01:09 AM
  #1  
PNWFit's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 22
From: Seattle, WA
Completed our first 2000+ mile roadtrip

We started off our venture in Seattle and made our way down to Moab using I-82/84 through Oregon, Idaho and Utah. I was very pleased with the versatility of this car and it's gas mileage. My only gripe, which has been mentioned several times on the forums, would be the 6th gear. In areas where the speed limits were 80 MPH, my tachometer would be hanging around 4000RPM or so. I averaged 31 MPG during the entire trip.


The nose mask and Lamin-X did a great job of protecting the front end.




Onto the photos!



picture host

print screen windows 7



image hosting 30 mb



forum image hosting



upload an image



screen shots



screen capture windows
 
Old Mar 26, 2015 | 07:20 AM
  #2  
Evesowner's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 129
From: NEW LENOX
5 Year Member
How is your mpg without the rooftop thingy at those speeds? I've always heard they impact a cars mpg.

I hate to bring it up but....my CVT is usually around 2300-2400 rpm at 70 mph. Though against a really nasty headwind it was around 3000 rpm at 70 mph last week.
 
Old Mar 26, 2015 | 08:52 AM
  #3  
Silver Surfer's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 76
From: South Jersey
5 Year Member
My CVT does remarkably well with mpg when pushing 70 mph. I have to agree that putting anything on the roof is going to adversely affect mpg. Here is a link relating to that issue:

Tests show bike racks can ruin your mileage
 
Old Mar 26, 2015 | 11:07 AM
  #4  
GeorgeL's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,545
From: SoCal, CA
31MPG is pretty good at those speeds with that box on the roof!

The big drag producer isn't so much the box as the gap between it and the roof. It creates a lot of turbulence which increases the effective frontal area.
 
Old Mar 27, 2015 | 03:07 PM
  #5  
PNWFit's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 22
From: Seattle, WA
Surprisingly the only time that the box was noticeably affecting the driving characteristics was when I would be driving behind semi trailers and areas of high cross winds.

My daily commute consists of city roads and freeways. Without the cargo box I average right around 36 MPG.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DeltaBond
General Fit Talk
2
Sep 27, 2013 03:38 PM
guailifit
Puerto Rico Community
0
Oct 27, 2009 03:24 AM
RichXKU
General Fit Talk
127
Jun 2, 2008 02:48 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 AM.