2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Best tires for fuel efficiency on my 2011 Fit Sport?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 04:32 PM
  #1  
junior40er's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,076
From: bellflower, ca 90706
Best tires for fuel efficiency on my 2011 Fit Sport?

I got a 2011 Fit Sport with factory 16" allow wheels. It is time for new tires ASAP. What is the best tire out there for fuel efficiency?
 
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 05:08 PM
  #2  
dwtaylorpdx's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,465
From: Portland Or
5 Year Member
Tire-rack rates them. Michelins seem to be one of the picks..
 
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 10:18 AM
  #3  
RideCDA's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 3
From: Coeur d'Alene
I purchased the Michelin Premier A/S tires as replacements for the OEM tires on my 2012 Fit Sport. I love them, BUT if you are concerned about MPG, you might want something else.

I bought my Fit about one year ago, and drove for about 6 months with the original tires. I thought they were OK at best. Definitely not inspiring under wet conditions, although that may be because they were worn.

I averaged about 36-38 MPG with the original tires. It was consistently 36 ish in town, and I could get 38 ish on long interstate trips. Once I put the Michelins on, MPG immediately dropped about 4 MPG, both in town and on the road.

Just finished going through the winter here (PNW), and I love the tires. Very good in the rain, and although it was a relatively light snowfall this year, the tires did great. I had a trip a few months ago and was on a very icy section of interstate. I passed a bumper and misc other car parts where someone obviously hit the concrete barrier, and I watched a truck in my rear view mirror start fishtailing and spin out. The Michelins held the road.
 
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 12:08 AM
  #4  
n9cv's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,095
From: Hebron, In
5 Year Member
Yokohama Avid Ascend They are a LRR (Low Rolling Resistance) tire with very good wear ratings and reasonable traction in snow. Check them out on Tire Rack.
 
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 07:10 PM
  #5  
dwtaylorpdx's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,465
From: Portland Or
5 Year Member
You have to dig in to each vendors pages then back search tire rack sometimes, most of them have low rolling resistance tires ,, the X-ice snow tire is even considered one..
 
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 07:26 PM
  #6  
mike410b's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7,624
From: .
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by RideCDA
I purchased the Michelin Premier A/S tires as replacements for the OEM tires on my 2012 Fit Sport. I love them, BUT if you are concerned about MPG, you might want something else.

I bought my Fit about one year ago, and drove for about 6 months with the original tires. I thought they were OK at best. Definitely not inspiring under wet conditions, although that may be because they were worn.

I averaged about 36-38 MPG with the original tires. It was consistently 36 ish in town, and I could get 38 ish on long interstate trips. Once I put the Michelins on, MPG immediately dropped about 4 MPG, both in town and on the road.

Just finished going through the winter here (PNW), and I love the tires. Very good in the rain, and although it was a relatively light snowfall this year, the tires did great. I had a trip a few months ago and was on a very icy section of interstate. I passed a bumper and misc other car parts where someone obviously hit the concrete barrier, and I watched a truck in my rear view mirror start fishtailing and spin out. The Michelins held the road.
Newer tires will give you worse fuel economy than worn tires.

The Yoko Avid Ascends have been fine as far as economy goes, though the best fuel economy I've ever achieved in either of my Fits was on cheapo General all-seasons and 46.8 MPG is not too bad.

Junior, sup with the NSX doe.
 
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 12:23 AM
  #7  
Odie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 724
From: usa
5 Year Member
mike410b , what Generals were they ? 46.8 is impressive . We have the RT43s' . Thanks
 

Last edited by Odie; Mar 22, 2016 at 12:32 AM.
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 12:02 PM
  #8  
Fit Charlie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 850
From: The 603
5 Year Member
I got Avid Ascends just before winter. I'm looking forward to see if they do better than the OEs once the good mpg weather comes back.
 
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 05:11 PM
  #9  
larrymcewin's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 188
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
5 Year Member
I have the 15" rims on my base, but I run Michelin Energy Savers. The do pretty good, but I'm in Utah where it's dry and I swap for snow tires during the winter. But during dry summer months they preform very well.
 
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 07:48 PM
  #10  
mike410b's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7,624
From: .
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Odie
mike410b , what Generals were they ? 46.8 is impressive . We have the RT43s' . Thanks
They were RT43. I hated them.
 
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 10:54 PM
  #11  
Odie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 724
From: usa
5 Year Member
We differ on the 43s'.
 

Last edited by Odie; Mar 22, 2016 at 10:56 PM.
Old Mar 23, 2016 | 10:25 PM
  #12  
Eugene.Atget's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 285
From: NYC
+1 for the Yokohama Avid Ascends. I don't keep detailed logs of mileage but I can't help but notice that the mpgs showing on the dash are higher than what I'd come to expect from my two previous sets of tires (OEM Bridgestones and then Sumitomos). Not a huge difference--about 2mpgs--but that's about 15-20 extra miles per tankful, which adds up over time. That said, with gasoline so inexpensive, these days I'd place grip in rain and snow, wear, and noise as higher priorities than mileage. Fortunately, the Ascends do well in all of these categories (imo), with the possible exception of noise, which tends to grow slightly as the tires wear.
 
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 01:58 PM
  #13  
Odie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 724
From: usa
5 Year Member
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 11:03 PM
  #14  
Odie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 724
From: usa
5 Year Member
General Altimax RT43 T-rated in snow + ice :
 

Last edited by Odie; Mar 24, 2016 at 11:05 PM.
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 11:37 PM
  #15  
mike410b's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7,624
From: .
5 Year Member
I hated the RT43.

I'm not sure why you're taking it upon yourself to work as a spokesman for General.
 
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 11:43 PM
  #16  
Odie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 724
From: usa
5 Year Member
I like , so far .
 

Last edited by Odie; Mar 24, 2016 at 11:48 PM.
Old Mar 25, 2016 | 07:52 AM
  #17  
Fit Charlie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 850
From: The 603
5 Year Member
Be a customer, not a fan.
 
Old Mar 25, 2016 | 08:17 AM
  #18  
Oneoldphlaytis's Avatar
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 121
From: usa
are you all talking about the same sizes of RT 43's?
depending on the size, the 14, 15 and 16 inch ones are made in Slovakia Germany USA Czech Republic Mexico Brazil France Portugal and Romania.
My guess is that the different sizes of the "same" tire will not be exactly the same...
 
Old Mar 25, 2016 | 01:31 PM
  #19  
Odie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 724
From: usa
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Fit Charlie
Be a customer, not a fan.
 
Old Mar 25, 2016 | 01:34 PM
  #20  
Odie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 724
From: usa
5 Year Member
The H rated 175/65-15 on the FIT are from Slovakia .
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 AM.