General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

57 Mpg!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #1  
TrickyPantz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 49
From: Virginia
57 Mpg!!

Ok, this isn't the average for an entire tank but it is an average over 70 miles according to my scanguage. It was on a trip home from Virginia on route 81 which is mostly flat and strait with some hills. I stopped for gas along the way and when I got back on the highway the scanguage started telling me I was getting around 55-60 mpg. By the time I got home I had gone about 70 miles and the scanguage reports I had used 1.2 gallons of gas along with a driving average of 57 mpg. I was cruise controlling at 80 mph for the vast majority of those 70 miles.

I've been driving for a couple of days now around town and have been getting my usual 32ish mpg on that same tank of gas. So it doesn't look like it was a crazy scanguage fluke. I'll have to wait for my next fillup to be absolutely sure, but the scanguage is telling me the tank average is still at 45 mpg.

This is exciting for me.
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #2  
pcs0snq's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,049
From: lake worth FL
I find it 100% impossible to even get 40mpg when going 80mph or even 70.
Check your scan gauge.....

Best of class according to cleanmpg is 46
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #3  
Fitftw's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,419
From: Tacoma, Washington
yeah im sorry but i dont believe u got 57 mpg let only 40 at 80 mph..considering your RPMs should be at like 4kish at that speed
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #4  
setinstone31's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9
From: Queens, NY, USA
really

what the heck is a scanguage? gauge tell how much fuel in the tank? yeah I'm assuming what makes the fit less effecient are the stoping mechanisms (abs, other such) and the apparently thirsty tranmission. Engines are always more effiecient at full throtle, only problem is that it's not too safe keep it there! thanks for the post
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #5  
Fitftw's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,419
From: Tacoma, Washington
scanguage is pretty much just a computer that allows you to fuel economy, fuel rate, coolant temp, air intake temp, engine speed, vehicle speed, etc. Its pretty much just a guage that any car has but a bit more.
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #6  
TOOL's Avatar
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,487
From: San Ramon, CA
It may be possible with a 40-90mph wind pushing you along!

Tyler
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #7  
dank24's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,189
From: NEPA
Not true
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #8  
Fitftw's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,419
From: Tacoma, Washington
Originally Posted by TOOL
It may be possible with a 40-90mph wind pushing you along!

Tyler
and you'd have to be drafting behind a big semi truck too
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 01:22 PM
  #9  
Biven5's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 79
From: Lincoln, NE
The speed limit between Lincoln and Omaha is set at 75 with a little variation for construction, i tend to drive between 77-83 mph and my tach reads 3200 rpm tops. I make this drive to and from Omaha 5 days a week so i don't know how accurate the scanguage but the 4000 rpms is way off.
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #10  
Fitftw's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,419
From: Tacoma, Washington
the 4k RPM thing i stated was just an exaggeration but my emphasis was that the RPMs would still be to high to be pushing 50+ MPG like tricky is trying to state.
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #11  
AppleMac*Fit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 306
From: Texarkana, TX
Originally Posted by Fitftw
yeah im sorry but i dont believe u got 57 mpg let only 40 at 80 mph..considering your RPMs should be at like 4kish at that speed
+1

57 MPG is possible, but not at that speed - and for the aforementioned reasons.
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #12  
TrickyPantz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 49
From: Virginia
RPMs were at 3200 like Biven said. I don't know what to tell you other than my Scangauge might have been confused. I'm just telling you what the numbers it was giving me were. I have gotten 47 mpg by dividing miles traveled by gallons at fill up before on a trip to Michigan and that was before I had the Scangauge so I know the Fit is capable of ridiculous mileage. I can definitely say that going over 80 causes a drop in my mileage but the faster I go up to 80 the better it is. I think V-tec engages at over 3200 RPM and thats what makes the mileage suck. So the faster I go go under 3200 the better. I'm looking forward to the return trip this weekend to see if the Scangauge had a hiccup or if the Fit was feeling good.

I will take a picture with my phone if it shows anything dubious again so you all can see.
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 05:39 PM
  #13  
binaryh4x's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 269
From: Fairfax, VA
What part of VA? 81 is far from flat.
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 05:59 PM
  #14  
MNfit's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,380
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by AppleMac*Fit
+1

57 MPG is possible, but not at that speed - and for the aforementioned reasons.
Drafting off a semi can inprove your MPG, 10 feet away you get a 40% incress. I think its 30% or so if your the "safe" distence away.
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 06:06 PM
  #15  
TrickyPantz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 49
From: Virginia
it was in MD and PA, cuz it was the last leg of the trip. The VA part is terribly hilly.
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #16  
SpoonSportFit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 472
From: Brandon, MS/ Memphis, TN
i don't know how the scangauge works but is there an avg. setting and a real time setting. because my grandmothers lincoln will say like 63mpg sometimes if you let off the gas and coast for a little while. so you might have it on a different setting.
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #17  
dank24's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,189
From: NEPA
Pa is all hills. i know cause I travel about 120miles a day on 81
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 10:38 PM
  #18  
TrickyPantz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 49
From: Virginia
what part of PA's 81 is all hills? not near MD, its flat all the way to harrisburg at least
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 11:08 PM
  #19  
Sugarphreak's Avatar
Push My Button
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,997
From: Calgary, Alberta
Well you could always top off your tank to see how much fuel you used.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 09:01 AM
  #20  
Doc Holliday's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
From: Raleigh, NC
Fill the tank up and do the mileage/gallons used calculation and then let us know, don't go by what a scangauge tells you. Best I've got is 43 and that was really nursing it so 57 I'm a little skeptical
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.