Imagine a Honda Fit Convertible
Imagine a Honda Fit Convertible
pt = barf
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 170
From: McDonough, GA
It just doesn't make sense to do a Fit convertible. It would lose everything that makes the Fit such a versatile car. No more hatch, no more rear cargo area, etc. The Civic would be a much better platform to go ragtop with. Not to mention what would have to be a better looking result as well.
Last edited by mdm427; Aug 23, 2008 at 11:42 AM. Reason: spelling
Thread Starter
|
New Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5
From: Indiana
Apparently Juliane has nothing better to do - she has over 160 posting to this site alone. For Allah's sake!
Last edited by oblio_arrow; Aug 23, 2008 at 02:27 PM.
Someone that spends HER life on FitFreak.net
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,963
From: Houston TX
I meant the photoshopped Fit with no roof, not the thread itself, dude, don't get your shorts in a knot.
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,244
From: Colorado Springs, CO
From a design standpoint I'll give it props. Though I'd have to agree on it looking a little strange. Still better that a PT convert that people are comparing it to.
From a reality standpoint I'd have to say not gonna happen except as someone's custom project.
Honda will never do this. For the design shown, the car would have to be reinforced like mad. Adding weight, killing what performace we have. Increasing cost, an putting the model out of the "econo" line that Honda has it in. Same reason why we have never seen a Civic convertible, and never will.
From a reality standpoint I'd have to say not gonna happen except as someone's custom project.
Honda will never do this. For the design shown, the car would have to be reinforced like mad. Adding weight, killing what performace we have. Increasing cost, an putting the model out of the "econo" line that Honda has it in. Same reason why we have never seen a Civic convertible, and never will.