General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

2007 Honda Fit Specifications for North America

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #1  
Dojo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 258
From: MD
2007 Honda Fit Specifications for North America

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td> 2007 Honda Fit- Specifications
By American Honda Motor Company
Sun, 8 Jan 2006, 17:06:00

</td> <td align="right" valign="top">
</td> </tr> </tbody></table> Torrance, Calif. 01/08/2006 --








<table border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td>.</td> <td>Fit</td> <td>Fit Sport</td></tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">Engineering</td></tr> <tr> <td>Engine Type</td> <td>In-Line 4-Cylinder</td> <td>In-Line 4-Cylinder</td></tr> <tr> <td>Engine Block/Cylinder Head</td> <td>Aluminum-Alloy</td> <td>Aluminum-Alloy</td></tr> <tr> <td>Displacement (cc)</td> <td>1497</td> <td>1497</td></tr> <tr> <td>Horsepower @ rpm (SAE net, Rev 8/04)</td> <td>109 @ 5800</td> <td>109 @ 5800</td></tr> <tr> <td>Torque (lb.-ft. @ rpm)</td> <td>105 @ 4800</td> <td>105 @ 4800</td></tr> <tr> <td>Redline (rpm)</td> <td>6300</td> <td>6300</td></tr> <tr> <td>Bore and Stroke (mm)</td> <td>73.0 x 89.4</td> <td>73.0 x 89.4</td></tr> <tr> <td>Compression Ratio</td> <td>10.4:1</td> <td>10.4:1</td></tr> <tr> <td>Valvetrain</td> <td>16-Valve SOHC VTEC (R)</td> <td>16-Valve SOHC VTEC (R)</td></tr> <tr> <td>Multi-Point Fuel Injection</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>Drive-by-Wire Throttle System (TM)</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>Front-Wheel Drive</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>CARB Emissions Rating</td> <td>LEV-2</td> <td>LEV-2</td></tr> <tr> <td>Direct Ignition System with Immobilizer</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>100,000-Miles-or-More Tune-Up Interval*</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">Does not apply to fluid and filter changes. Exact mileage is determined by actual driving conditions. Please see your owner's manual for more details.</td></tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">Transmissions</td></tr> <tr> <td>5-Speed Manual Transmission</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
Gear Ratios:
1st: 3.462
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
2nd:1.870
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
3rd: 1.321
</td> <td>x
</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
4th: 0.970
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
5th: 0.757
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
Reverse: 3.231
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
Final Drive: 4.294
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>5-Speed Automatic Transmission (available)</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
Gear Ratios:
1st: 2.995

</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
2nd: 1.678
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
3rd: 1.066
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
4th: 0.756
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
5th: 0.550
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
Reverse: 1.956
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>
Final Drive: 4.562
</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">Body/Suspension/Chassis</td></tr> <tr> <td>Unit-Body Construction</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>MacPherson Strut Front Suspension</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>Torsion-Beam Rear Suspension</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>Stabilizer Bar (mm., front)</td> <td>21.0</td> <td>21.0</td></tr> <tr> <td>Electric Power-Assisted Rack-and-Pinion Steering (EPS)</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td>Steering Wheel Turns, Lock-to-Lock</td> <td>2.41</td> <td>2.41</td></tr> <tr> <td>Steering Ratio</td> <td>12.8</td> <td>12.8</td></tr> <tr> <td>Turning Diameter, Curb-to-Curb (ft.)</td> <td>35.6</td> <td>35.6</td></tr> <tr> <td>Power-Assisted Ventilated Front Disc/Rear Drum Brakes (in.)</td> <td>10.3/ 7.9</td> <td>10.3/ 7.9</td></tr> <tr> <td>Wheels</td> <td>14" with Full Covers</td> <td>15" Alloy</td></tr> <tr> <td>All-Season Tires</td> <td>P175/ 65 R14 81S</td> <td>P195/ 55 R15 84H</td></tr> <tr> <td>Compact Spare Tire</td> <td>x</td> <td>x</td></tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">Interior Measurements</td></tr> <tr> <td>Headroom (in., front/rear)</td> <td>40.6 / 38.6</td> <td>40.6 / 38.6</td></tr> <tr> <td>Legroom (in., front/rear)</td> <td>41.9 / 33.7</td> <td>41.9 / 33.7</td></tr> <tr> <td>Shoulder Room (in., front/rear)</td> <td>52.8 / 50.6</td> <td>52.8 / 50.6</td></tr> <tr> <td>Hiproom (in., front/rear)</td> <td>51.2 / 51.0</td> <td>51.2 / 51.0</td></tr> <tr> <td>Cargo Volume (cu. ft., seat up/down)</td> <td>21.3 / TBD</td> <td>21.3 / TBD</td></tr> <tr> <td>Passenger Volume (cu. ft.)</td> <td>90.1</td> <td>90.1</td></tr> <tr> <td>Seating Capacity</td> <td>5</td> <td>5</td></tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">Exterior Measurements</td></tr> <tr> <td>Wheelbase (in.)</td> <td>96.5</td> <td>96.5</td></tr> <tr> <td>Length (in.)</td> <td>157.4</td> <td>157.4</td></tr> <tr> <td>Height (in.)</td> <td>60</td> <td>60</td></tr> <tr> <td>Width (in.)</td> <td>66.2</td> <td>66.2</td></tr> <tr> <td>Track (in., front/rear)</td> <td>57.3 / 57.1</td> <td>57.3 / 57.1</td></tr> <tr> <td>Curb Weight (lbs. MT/AT)</td> <td>2432 / 2514 </td> <td>2471/ 2551</td></tr> <tr> <td>Weight Distribution (%, front/rear, MT)</td> <td>61.8 / 38.2</td> <td>61.6/ 38.4</td></tr> <tr> <td>Weight Distribution (%, front/rear, AT)</td> <td>63.3 / 36.7</td> <td>63.2/ 36.8</td></tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">EPA Mileage Estimates*/ Capacities</td></tr> <tr> <td>5-Speed Manual (City/Highway)</td> <td>33 / 38</td> <td>33 / 38</td></tr> <tr> <td>5-Speed Automatic (City/Highway)</td> <td>31 / 38</td> <td>31 / 38</td></tr> <tr> <td>Crankcase (qt.)</td> <td>4.4</td> <td>4.4</td></tr> <tr> <td>Coolant System (gal.)</td> <td>1.4</td> <td>1.4</td></tr> <tr> <td>Fuel (gal.)</td> <td>10.83</td> <td>10.83</td></tr> <tr> <td>Required Fuel</td> <td>Regular Unleaded</td> <td>Regular Unleaded</td></tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">* Based on 2007 EPA mileage estimates. Use for comparison purposes only. Actual mileage may vary.</td></tr></tbody></table>
 

Last edited by FaceYogurt; Jan 11, 2006 at 10:51 PM.
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 02:32 PM
  #2  
Cannon's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 27
From: High Desert, So Cal
Thanks for this post! Makes it easier than searching through all the Honda press info.
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #3  
VelociRacer's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 59
From: Earth
At the bottom of Honda of Canada's press release it said to check www.honda.ca/fit today for an official page for the Fit. Well, I'm not seing anything so far. Anyone else seen a similar list for Canada's DX/LX/SPORT?
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 03:27 PM
  #4  
Dañiel's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 539
From: Canada
Canada's press? Where is that?
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #5  
Dañiel's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 539
From: Canada
The newest news item Honda Canada lists is 11 months old.
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 04:05 PM
  #6  
Dojo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 258
From: MD
Canadian Specs

We are still waiting for the release of the Canadian specific information!

D
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 04:19 PM
  #7  
Jonniedee's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 718
From: Plainwell Michigan
Other then the Press pages, the US Honda Fit consumer info is very "fluffy" at this point.
I'm sure you Cannoks will get the info shortly as well...
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 04:56 PM
  #8  
Dañiel's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 539
From: Canada
Yeah, Honda.ca takes it's sweet ass time updating.
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 05:56 PM
  #9  
VelociRacer's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 59
From: Earth
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 06:31 PM
  #10  
kps's Avatar
kps
Honda Fit Forums Moderator
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 374
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by VelociRacer
Anyone else seen a similar list for Canada's DX/LX/SPORT?
Here's a sentence from the US press release:
Fit comes with standard amenities such as air conditioning, an AM/FM/CD audio system with four speakers, power windows, power mirrors, power door locks, and a two-tone interior.
And the corresponding sentence in the Canadian version:
Fit comes with standard amenities such as an AM/FM/CD audio system, power windows and a two-tone interior.
So I'd bet that the LX is the same as the base US version, and the DX lacks A/C, power mirrors, and power door locks.
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 06:34 PM
  #11  
Dañiel's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 539
From: Canada
Bitchin'!!!!!! Maybe the Canadian Fit could be had for $13k. Air is a waste some summers.
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #12  
fccliang's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
From: canada
Here is the latest news From the Canadian Side

http://www.canadiandriver.com/news/0.../060109-10.htm
 
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 01:22 PM
  #13  
VelociRacer's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 59
From: Earth
OK www.honda.ca/fit is working now. But I can't read it since I can't upgrade the flash player on this 'puter. Could some one please post the specs and any pricing/pictures? Thanks.
 
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #14  
Dañiel's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 539
From: Canada
Originally Posted by VelociRacer
OK www.honda.ca/fit is working now. But I can't read it since I can't upgrade the flash player on this 'puter. Could some one please post the specs and any pricing/pictures? Thanks.
No prices there or specs, just all hype. I must say they did a nice job on that site.
 
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 01:56 PM
  #15  
Dojo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 258
From: MD
I agree with Dañiel, the Canadian site looks much better than the sad US Fit page.
 
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #16  
Dañiel's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 539
From: Canada


There you go, the main page, and the rest of the site is the same looking.
 
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 02:56 PM
  #17  
VelociRacer's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 59
From: Earth
Much appreciated!
 
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 02:55 PM
  #18  
bsgump's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 36
From: United States
Thumbs down 1996 Civic HX got better MPG

The 1996 Honda Civic HX was getting high miles per gallon with:

CVT 34 city / 38 hwy

5MT 35 city / 43 hwy

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>

AND THAT WAS 10 YEARS AGO!

<o></o>
 
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 11:53 AM
  #19  
VelociRacer's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 59
From: Earth
Yes, but is also had an anemic vtec-e and loooong gear ratios. Back when Honda had no Hybrid, but now they do, so they no longer have to make slugs. They are back to making fun, yet safe, little products.
 
Old Jan 14, 2006 | 05:24 AM
  #20  
crxgator's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
From: Woodstock, NY, USA
Originally Posted by bsgump
The 1996 Honda Civic HX was getting high miles per gallon with:

CVT 34 city / 38 hwy

5MT 35 city / 43 hwy

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>

AND THAT WAS 10 YEARS AGO!

<o></o>
seriously, shut up already...
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.