Honda Fit vs. Fiat Panda
So they're not exactly the world's most comparable autos, but there are some undeniable similarities. Which are some pro's and con's to each car - like what can the Fit offer that the Panda doesn't and vice versa? Which would you say has a longer shelf life in terms of reliability?
|
panda? is it made in china?
|
Originally Posted by kenchan
(Post 652922)
panda? is it made in china?
However, the Chinese company "Great Wall" did knock off the Panda with a car called the "Peri." They're saying the Panda might come to the U.S. in its 4x4 version, which could possibly be under the Jeep nameplate. I'd rock one. To the OP, the Panda is available in 4x4 (as mentioned). Maximum power is 99 hp, so it'd be less powerful than a Fit. It's also smaller than a fit. I believe the Panda is considered an A-class vehicle, whereas the fit is a B-class. As you know, it's hard to beat a Honda for reliability. I don't know much about Fiat's reliability, though. I'd bet it's not as good as Honda's, though ... |
Originally Posted by Ginza Wagon
(Post 652927)
As you know, it's hard to beat a Honda for reliability. I don't know much about Fiat's reliability, though. I'd bet it's not as good as Honda's, though ... Nuff said. |
yah, ok, Peri. i couldn't remember one copied off the other or something.
anything with a chyrsler name i dont think i would be considering any time soon. |
Originally Posted by Moltisanti2009
(Post 652972)
When you hear about reliability ratings, you never hear Fiat mentioned...it's always toyota, honda, and subaru.
Nuff said. However, I haven't followed the reliability ratings in Europe. |
Originally Posted by paulgraham
(Post 652426)
So they're not exactly the world's most comparable autos, but there are some undeniable similarities. Which are some pro's and con's to each car - like what can the Fit offer that the Panda doesn't and vice versa? Which would you say has a longer shelf life in terms of reliability?
As a past owner of a Fiat and wrenching several I can vouch for Honda having considerable reliability edge on Fiats. One of the funniest jokes around is the thought of Chrysler selling Fiats specified by bureaucrats. LOL squared. Fiats usually drove well between repairs or tuneups but my Hondas have been far superior and drove just as well if not better. And yes I've had an Abarth too; sceamer for a month at a time. The latest Automotive news ran the consumer quality data for the Fiat in selected Europen countries and Fiat was in the lowest quartille. Things haven't changed much it seems. PS fan of the Steig, eh. |
Originally Posted by Ginza Wagon
(Post 653062)
Well, a lot of that probably has to do with the fact that Fiat isn't sold in the U.S.
However, I haven't followed the reliability ratings in Europe. |
That Panda 100HP sure has found a lot of fans. I've read a lot of road tests praising the chassis and engine balance of the little Fiat.
It looks a little too squarish for me though. But that's where its cousin the Fiat 500 Abarth comes in. ;) Mmmm, tasty... http://allworldcars.com/wordpress/wp...500_abarth.jpg |
I don't mind driving an econobox, but that thing (Panda) takes Ugly to a whole new level. I'd rather drive an xB. Or even the Cube.
|
I loved those Fiats 40 years ago. You really had to keep the revs up to get any power at all. They looked pretty for one mid-Western winter--real sexy and Italian, although very tiny. Then they all had the same color: rust. Didn't matter, though, because they wouldn't run after that winter anyway. You could learn a lot about cars from owning a Fiat.
Of course they're much better now. Cheers. |
Originally Posted by p nut
(Post 656503)
I don't mind driving an econobox, but that thing (Panda) takes Ugly to a whole new level. I'd rather drive an xB. Or even the Cube.
Fret not, next year you can buy one from Chrysler. LOL squared. |
Originally Posted by SportMTNavi
(Post 656550)
I loved those Fiats 40 years ago. You really had to keep the revs up to get any power at all. They looked pretty for one mid-Western winter--real sexy and Italian, although very tiny. Then they all had the same color: rust. Didn't matter, though, because they wouldn't run after that winter anyway. You could learn a lot about cars from owning a Fiat.
Of course they're much better now. Cheers. Not much better.. Refer to latest quality ratings from Europe. Which is why the Panda will NOT be Chrysler badged. It will be Fiast badged. |
Originally Posted by mahout
(Post 656948)
Not much better..
|
They may not be the most reliable but hey they are pretty new.
2009 Fiat 500 Abarth - First Drive Review/Not Sold in the U.S./High Performance/Hot Lists/Reviews/Car and Driver - Car And Driver |
Panda's for the WIN!!!!!!! j/k you cant beat a honda
|
I'm guessing when the Panda does get here; it'll be equipped with more horsepower, not much more, but enough to move us fat Americans around town. j/k But, I'm not excited for the cars sporting Fiat badges... but as for Alfa Romeo, I'll gladly push one of those home after it breaks down.
|
Originally Posted by Flyin172s
(Post 669709)
I'm guessing when the Panda does get here; it'll be equipped with more horsepower, not much more, but enough to move us fat Americans around town. j/k But, I'm not excited for the cars sporting Fiat badges... but as for Alfa Romeo, I'll gladly push one of those home after it breaks down.
Look for less power to meet US emissions standards and greater weight to meet DOT/NHTSA requirements. Thats why it will be branded FIAT, not Chrysler. The industry expect sales dependent on Obama rebates. |
What the Fit offers is versatility, fun and reliability.
The Fiat offers the opportunity to meet new friends at the local garage. Mechanics are usually very nice, grounded people. |
I have seen like the Jeep version of the Fiat Panda 4x4. But I think it might've been photochopped. Well I heard that the Fit was awd outside the us. I wonder how it would've done performance wise.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands