FS: Nikon Mount - Tamron 70-200mm ƒ/2.8 "AF-S"

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 29, 2009 | 12:25 AM

Arisenfury

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 1,398

From: CT

SOLD: Nikon Mount - Tamron 70-200mm ƒ/2.8 "AF-S"

Pricing this one to move as unexpected bills have showed up and I don't use it that much to warrant keeping it. It's in pristine condition, I've literally shot with it a handful of times since I've owned it. Sharp as a tack too. Uses Tamron's internal focusing motor so this will AF on D40/D60/D5000 bodies. I'm looking for $500 which will include shipping and paypal fees! Get this one for cheap. PM for questions or email w.tolly@vzw.blackberry.net for quicker responses during the day. sold

The Lens:
Name: _DSC0025-1.jpg
Views: 45
Size: 50.8 KB

Name: _DSC0025-1.jpg
Views: 45
Size: 50.8 KB

Name: _DSC0021.jpg
Views: 38
Size: 38.1 KB

Name: _DSC0019-1.jpg
Views: 41
Size: 45.7 KB

Last edited by Arisenfury; Jun 30, 2009 at 08:51 AM.

Jun 30, 2009 | 04:11 AM

Super Mario

Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 1,625

From: San Diego, CA

Bump for a nice lens and a great price.

Jul 1, 2009 | 05:37 PM

AnlDyxp_GD3

Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Oct 2008

Posts: 1,797

From: W. LA, CA

Ooooh. Fast glass! I could use one of these =]

Jul 1, 2009 | 08:00 PM

OneStopCustoms

Member

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 780

From: L.A., CA

$500 is cheap for the lens... got sale though... PS I added you as a friend on flickr... lol you've got some nice pics...

Nacho

Jul 1, 2009 | 10:38 PM

Arisenfury

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 1,398

From: CT

I know I could've stuck it up there for over $600 but I didn't wanna wait around for it.

Jul 2, 2009 | 11:41 AM

OneStopCustoms

Member

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 780

From: L.A., CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arisenfury

I know I could've stuck it up there for over $600 but I didn't wanna wait around for it.

to bad I have a canon... GRRR lol

I actually bought the af18-200 from tamron, love it... however, its a f 3.5, I wish it would had been an f2.8, it actually costs the same that yours cost.