Other Car Related Discussions Discuss all other cars here.

Xb2? What To Do!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #1  
s0x's Avatar
s0x
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,409
From: Southern California :D
5 Year Member
Xb2? What To Do!!!

hmm i just drove the new xB its like.....driving a camry lol :D but better looking? (with the optional lipkit) but then it gets bad gas milage but i waited so long for this car and i think they ruined it however it does come with more standard options than the fit does for only slightly more money... but the fit is still go :) lol so iono i think i need both :( has anyone else driven the new xb? what do you guys think?
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 05:59 PM
  #2  
Halcyon's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 331
From: Winnipeg
5 Year Member
I thought the xB was being retired for the Xd. I still dont know why they wont bring Scions to canada.
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 06:29 PM
  #3  
TOOL's Avatar
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,487
From: San Ramon, CA
Im in the same situation with the xB2 and the Fit. Love them both but i think im going to go with the xB2 because of more cargo space. Im a drummer in a band so i need the space. Im not 100% sure on my desicion yet, its so hard..
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 07:36 PM
  #4  
Ro_Ja Boy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 516
From: Las Vegas
The new Xb has more cargo space than the Fit?
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #5  
fazzster's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 82
From: MA
5 Year Member
No brainer....get the Honda. Toyota's have no soul.....
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #6  
JDMchris.com's Avatar
I run THIS
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,411
From: Riverside
5 Year Member
i personally think the new xb is ugly. I bet the fit is still faster too lol.

anyways looks like side airbags are not offered, you have to pay extra for the alloy wheels, spoiler, foglights. So no it doesnt have more standard features, theres less. Also to get one equally equipped as the Fit your looking at 18k. Is the extra 2.5k worth it to be driving a ugly car? lol
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 08:24 PM
  #7  
Ro_Ja Boy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 516
From: Las Vegas
I agree. I really like the 1st gen xB's and considered one, but the new ones are ugly.
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 08:28 PM
  #8  
Cat's Avatar
Cat
Someone that spends HER life on FitFreak.net
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,173
From: St. Albans, WV
The XA is being retired after this year and the new XD is replacing it. My friend has a new XB and they love it but I still think that the Fit is much better in all respects. They love my Fit and never knew the car existed until I bought this one. They call the XB their clown car - so I don't know if that is a good thing or a bad thing! LOL!

Cat :x
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 08:49 PM
  #9  
smatts's Avatar
Honda Fit Forums Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,704
From: New Wesminster, BC
The new XB is ugly! Have you seen the advertisements for them it's usually a shot of the car and then a "HOT [ ]" and "NOT [ ]" checkbox. I've also seen one ad that was "Love it.", "Hate it."

At least they know some people think it's ugly :o
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 09:16 PM
  #10  
TOOL's Avatar
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,487
From: San Ramon, CA
Originally Posted by JDMchris.com
i personally think the new xb is ugly. I bet the fit is still faster too lol.

anyways looks like side airbags are not offered, you have to pay extra for the alloy wheels, spoiler, foglights. So no it doesnt have more standard features, theres less. Also to get one equally equipped as the Fit your looking at 18k. Is the extra 2.5k worth it to be driving a ugly car? lol
Side airbags are standard.;)
 
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 11:14 PM
  #11  
JDMchris.com's Avatar
I run THIS
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,411
From: Riverside
5 Year Member
it shows on their website that front airbags and side curtain airbags are what is standard. No mention of front side airbags.
 
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 12:39 AM
  #12  
ThePaulson's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 45
From: Detroit
I happen to like the Xb, but it wasn't quite in the price range if I put a few basics on it. Besides, I believe the Fit will handle better.
 
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 06:46 AM
  #13  
Steeldog's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 689
From: Alabanana
I still say if you want to drive one of those crates, get a job at UPS. They will supply you with a brown one and buy the fuel, plus they encourage you to be fast!:cool:

OK, the xB is smaller than the standard-issue UPS van, but it IS equally sexy. That is, as sexy as the back side of a mud fence.
 
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 10:59 AM
  #14  
Paulo107's Avatar
June 2007 1st Place Fit of the Month Winner
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,664
From: The Latin Pot
Originally Posted by JDMchris.com
i personally think the new xb is ugly. I bet the fit is still faster too lol.

anyways looks like side airbags are not offered, you have to pay extra for the alloy wheels, spoiler, foglights. So no it doesnt have more standard features, theres less. Also to get one equally equipped as the Fit your looking at 18k. Is the extra 2.5k worth it to be driving a ugly car? lol
i agree...i think the car is ugly as hell and will always have love for the box XB...i love my Fit and i would hope Honda just puts a little more power in the next gen Fit and keep it the same size and style and not F-it like scion did to the XB...thats just my opinion:rolleyes:
 
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 01:28 PM
  #15  
s0x's Avatar
s0x
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,409
From: Southern California :D
5 Year Member
argh

haha the box is v fast now dont underestimate it lol but its not even that much of a box anymore =( i waited a really long time for the next gen to come out to buy a car cuz i thaught they were gunna bring the "music box" to US wich is funky like the first gen (www.toyota.co.jp/bb) but they didnt so i was sol so i think im holding on to that little ounce of hope i still had for scion but i do think they alienated a big segment of the market. fuel effeciency was a big roll 30 mpg is good but my 12 year old talon gets better milage than that with only 18 hp less thats not that big of a jump... and no the xb does not have more cargo space believe it or not lol the back is still small the original box didnt have fold down seats and the new one got them except now they suck cuz the extra room went to the engine bay. and it has less height. but its okay cuz my aunt just bought an xb1 so i think ill just drool over hers lol.
 
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #16  
TOOL's Avatar
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,487
From: San Ramon, CA
Wow the Fit has more space then the xB2? Thats hard to belive because ive sat in both and folded down both seats in the back and the Xb2 is definetly wider and appears to be longer...Where did you here that the Fit has more cargo space? Link plz!
 
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 03:32 PM
  #17  
s0x's Avatar
s0x
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,409
From: Southern California :D
5 Year Member
heh

the fit has more height space even if the xb seems a tad longer go to each website and look up cubic ft of cargo space fit has more i dont have the energy or motivation to link you lol
 
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 06:27 PM
  #18  
serinammavongsa's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 339
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by fazzster
No brainer....get the Honda. Toyota's have no soul.....
i agree with him about getting the Honda
but i disagree about Toyotas having no soul, have you ever been to an all toyota meet:D they are so sweet
 
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 09:20 PM
  #19  
ZebiFit's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 28
From: Texas
It was a close call between the fit and xB2 and we ended up with the fit. The gas mileage was a real killer for the xb2 for us. The interior space seemed similar with a slight front seat comfort advantage in the xb and a slight cargo space advantage for the fit. The fit's interior space vs exterior size is mind boggling, like a mini TARDIS (Dr. Who reference complete). The new xb pulls a LOT harder than the fit, and manual xb's are easy to find, but the fit has better handling and more "go-kart" factor around the corners. The cost looks similar on paper, but optioned out the way I would want it, the xb was around 18k (alloys, spoiler, a few misc options) and the fit sport had a satisfactory setup without adding anything.
 
Old Jun 28, 2007 | 12:31 AM
  #20  
Gordio's Avatar
Someone that spends his life on FitFreak.net
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,092
From: san francisco, ca, USA
Originally Posted by Ro_Ja Boy
The new Xb has more cargo space than the Fit?
the new scion is a frikin CUV with small wheels. it better have more cargo space. it's a foot longer, 2.4L engine, and 3000lbs.

If it has more space, it's only by a slight, for the new scion xB is not as space-efficient as its predecessor. Ive sat in the original xB and htat thing is damn roomy. But being 1 ft longer, looking at the pictures of the new scion, it's very apparent it isn't using its dimensions right.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 AM.