94 Accord Wagon Failed Emmissions - Running Hot?
Guest
Posts: n/a
94 Accord Wagon Failed Emmissions - Running Hot?
My 1994 Accord Wagon, 172k miles, failed emissions for NOX. I am told that
my combustions chambers is running "hot" but the Catalytic converter may
still be ok. One suggestion is to add some alchol before trying the test
again and also to make sure the engine is a cool as possible. Someone
else<g> has told me to get some magic additive that is sold in auto parts
stores to fix my problem...another genius suggests a run of Gum out.
I am willing to spring for a new catalytic converter if it fails a retest
and if that will certainly fix my problem. Can anyone explain what my
problem is, in layman's terms, and the validity of some of the helpful
suggestions from my buddies?
Thanks,
Mark
my combustions chambers is running "hot" but the Catalytic converter may
still be ok. One suggestion is to add some alchol before trying the test
again and also to make sure the engine is a cool as possible. Someone
else<g> has told me to get some magic additive that is sold in auto parts
stores to fix my problem...another genius suggests a run of Gum out.
I am willing to spring for a new catalytic converter if it fails a retest
and if that will certainly fix my problem. Can anyone explain what my
problem is, in layman's terms, and the validity of some of the helpful
suggestions from my buddies?
Thanks,
Mark
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 94 Accord Wagon Failed Emmissions - Running Hot?
"Mark Lewis" <mdlewis@mdlewis.com> wrote in
news:G7ZAe.136388$mx5.123305@fe08.lga:
> My 1994 Accord Wagon, 172k miles, failed emissions for NOX. I am told
> that my combustions chambers is running "hot" but the Catalytic
> converter may still be ok. One suggestion is to add some alchol before
> trying the test again and also to make sure the engine is a cool as
> possible.
You may fail on high HCs. Don't put crap in your gas to mask an unrelated
problem. Find the real problem first.
Prep the car with long, hard run on the highway immediately beforehand to
make certain the cat is up to temp.
> Someone else<g> has told me to get some magic additive that
> is sold in auto parts stores to fix my problem...another genius
> suggests a run of Gum out.
Chevron Techron injector cleaner isn't a bad idea, but not right now.
>
> I am willing to spring for a new catalytic converter if it fails a
> retest and if that will certainly fix my problem. Can anyone explain
> what my problem is, in layman's terms, and the validity of some of the
> helpful suggestions from my buddies?
>
DO NOT replace that cat. It is the LEAST likely culprit.
Your problems range from defective EGR to overly advanced timing to a lean-
biased O2 sensor to gummed-up injectors to daily variance in the emissions
testing equipment (up to 400% variance per day).
http://tinyurl.com/axsuo
http://www.asashop.org/autoinc/oct2004/techtips.cfm
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
news:G7ZAe.136388$mx5.123305@fe08.lga:
> My 1994 Accord Wagon, 172k miles, failed emissions for NOX. I am told
> that my combustions chambers is running "hot" but the Catalytic
> converter may still be ok. One suggestion is to add some alchol before
> trying the test again and also to make sure the engine is a cool as
> possible.
You may fail on high HCs. Don't put crap in your gas to mask an unrelated
problem. Find the real problem first.
Prep the car with long, hard run on the highway immediately beforehand to
make certain the cat is up to temp.
> Someone else<g> has told me to get some magic additive that
> is sold in auto parts stores to fix my problem...another genius
> suggests a run of Gum out.
Chevron Techron injector cleaner isn't a bad idea, but not right now.
>
> I am willing to spring for a new catalytic converter if it fails a
> retest and if that will certainly fix my problem. Can anyone explain
> what my problem is, in layman's terms, and the validity of some of the
> helpful suggestions from my buddies?
>
DO NOT replace that cat. It is the LEAST likely culprit.
Your problems range from defective EGR to overly advanced timing to a lean-
biased O2 sensor to gummed-up injectors to daily variance in the emissions
testing equipment (up to 400% variance per day).
http://tinyurl.com/axsuo
http://www.asashop.org/autoinc/oct2004/techtips.cfm
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 94 Accord Wagon Failed Emmissions - Running Hot?
Mark Lewis wrote:
> My 1994 Accord Wagon, 172k miles, failed emissions for NOX. I am told that
> my combustions chambers is running "hot" but the Catalytic converter may
> still be ok. One suggestion is to add some alchol before trying the test
> again and also to make sure the engine is a cool as possible. Someone
> else<g> has told me to get some magic additive that is sold in auto parts
> stores to fix my problem...another genius suggests a run of Gum out.
>
> I am willing to spring for a new catalytic converter if it fails a retest
> and if that will certainly fix my problem. Can anyone explain what my
> problem is, in layman's terms, and the validity of some of the helpful
> suggestions from my buddies?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
check the ignition timing, and egr.
> My 1994 Accord Wagon, 172k miles, failed emissions for NOX. I am told that
> my combustions chambers is running "hot" but the Catalytic converter may
> still be ok. One suggestion is to add some alchol before trying the test
> again and also to make sure the engine is a cool as possible. Someone
> else<g> has told me to get some magic additive that is sold in auto parts
> stores to fix my problem...another genius suggests a run of Gum out.
>
> I am willing to spring for a new catalytic converter if it fails a retest
> and if that will certainly fix my problem. Can anyone explain what my
> problem is, in layman's terms, and the validity of some of the helpful
> suggestions from my buddies?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
check the ignition timing, and egr.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 94 Accord Wagon Failed Emmissions - Running Hot?
Thanks. Not very comfortable with dumping stuff in the tank... The dealer
did check the car out after the failure, would their diagnositics
highlighted any of these other items?
Mark
"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in message
news:Xns9691DAAD05CF2tegger@207.14.113.17...
> "Mark Lewis" <mdlewis@mdlewis.com> wrote in
> news:G7ZAe.136388$mx5.123305@fe08.lga:
>
>> My 1994 Accord Wagon, 172k miles, failed emissions for NOX. I am told
>> that my combustions chambers is running "hot" but the Catalytic
>> converter may still be ok. One suggestion is to add some alchol before
>> trying the test again and also to make sure the engine is a cool as
>> possible.
>
>
> You may fail on high HCs. Don't put crap in your gas to mask an unrelated
> problem. Find the real problem first.
>
> Prep the car with long, hard run on the highway immediately beforehand to
> make certain the cat is up to temp.
>
>
>
>> Someone else<g> has told me to get some magic additive that
>> is sold in auto parts stores to fix my problem...another genius
>> suggests a run of Gum out.
>
>
> Chevron Techron injector cleaner isn't a bad idea, but not right now.
>
>
>>
>> I am willing to spring for a new catalytic converter if it fails a
>> retest and if that will certainly fix my problem. Can anyone explain
>> what my problem is, in layman's terms, and the validity of some of the
>> helpful suggestions from my buddies?
>>
>
>
> DO NOT replace that cat. It is the LEAST likely culprit.
>
> Your problems range from defective EGR to overly advanced timing to a
> lean-
> biased O2 sensor to gummed-up injectors to daily variance in the emissions
> testing equipment (up to 400% variance per day).
>
> http://tinyurl.com/axsuo
>
> http://www.asashop.org/autoinc/oct2004/techtips.cfm
>
>
> --
> TeGGeR®
>
> The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
> www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
did check the car out after the failure, would their diagnositics
highlighted any of these other items?
Mark
"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in message
news:Xns9691DAAD05CF2tegger@207.14.113.17...
> "Mark Lewis" <mdlewis@mdlewis.com> wrote in
> news:G7ZAe.136388$mx5.123305@fe08.lga:
>
>> My 1994 Accord Wagon, 172k miles, failed emissions for NOX. I am told
>> that my combustions chambers is running "hot" but the Catalytic
>> converter may still be ok. One suggestion is to add some alchol before
>> trying the test again and also to make sure the engine is a cool as
>> possible.
>
>
> You may fail on high HCs. Don't put crap in your gas to mask an unrelated
> problem. Find the real problem first.
>
> Prep the car with long, hard run on the highway immediately beforehand to
> make certain the cat is up to temp.
>
>
>
>> Someone else<g> has told me to get some magic additive that
>> is sold in auto parts stores to fix my problem...another genius
>> suggests a run of Gum out.
>
>
> Chevron Techron injector cleaner isn't a bad idea, but not right now.
>
>
>>
>> I am willing to spring for a new catalytic converter if it fails a
>> retest and if that will certainly fix my problem. Can anyone explain
>> what my problem is, in layman's terms, and the validity of some of the
>> helpful suggestions from my buddies?
>>
>
>
> DO NOT replace that cat. It is the LEAST likely culprit.
>
> Your problems range from defective EGR to overly advanced timing to a
> lean-
> biased O2 sensor to gummed-up injectors to daily variance in the emissions
> testing equipment (up to 400% variance per day).
>
> http://tinyurl.com/axsuo
>
> http://www.asashop.org/autoinc/oct2004/techtips.cfm
>
>
> --
> TeGGeR®
>
> The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
> www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 94 Accord Wagon Failed Emmissions - Running Hot?
"Mark Lewis" <mdlewis@mdlewis.com> wrote in
news:nZ5Be.136480$mx5.56500@fe08.lga:
> Thanks. Not very comfortable with dumping stuff in the tank... The
> dealer did check the car out after the failure, would their
> diagnositics highlighted any of these other items?
Depends how competent they are in diagnosing failures. Dealers are not
usually the best place to bring an older car for diagnosis, since they
specialize in the new stuff.
Also, you have not posted any of your actual numbers (or the limits in your
area), so it's difficult to help you further.
If you book a retest at a different facility, or at the same place a week
later, you may pass without any work done at all to your car. Seriously. If
you fail again, then more attention is needed. Until then I would do
nothing.
Check out my numbers:
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/...emissions.html
See the June 2003 NO numbers? I did absolutely nothing except oil changes
and the usual maintenance between then and 2005, and NO plummetted.
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
news:nZ5Be.136480$mx5.56500@fe08.lga:
> Thanks. Not very comfortable with dumping stuff in the tank... The
> dealer did check the car out after the failure, would their
> diagnositics highlighted any of these other items?
Depends how competent they are in diagnosing failures. Dealers are not
usually the best place to bring an older car for diagnosis, since they
specialize in the new stuff.
Also, you have not posted any of your actual numbers (or the limits in your
area), so it's difficult to help you further.
If you book a retest at a different facility, or at the same place a week
later, you may pass without any work done at all to your car. Seriously. If
you fail again, then more attention is needed. Until then I would do
nothing.
Check out my numbers:
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/...emissions.html
See the June 2003 NO numbers? I did absolutely nothing except oil changes
and the usual maintenance between then and 2005, and NO plummetted.
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 94 Accord Wagon Failed Emmissions - Running Hot?
The numbers are:
HC (PPM)
Limit 136
Emmisions 7
Pass
CO(%)
Limit .73
Emissions .02
Pass
NOx (PPM)
Limit 1591
Emissions 2186
Fail
Does this help at all? I am certainly going to try again at another place
after a long ride there.
Thanks,
Mark
"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in message
news:Xns96924967F2FC0tegger@207.14.113.17...
> "Mark Lewis" <mdlewis@mdlewis.com> wrote in
> news:nZ5Be.136480$mx5.56500@fe08.lga:
>
>> Thanks. Not very comfortable with dumping stuff in the tank... The
>> dealer did check the car out after the failure, would their
>> diagnositics highlighted any of these other items?
>
>
>
> Depends how competent they are in diagnosing failures. Dealers are not
> usually the best place to bring an older car for diagnosis, since they
> specialize in the new stuff.
>
> Also, you have not posted any of your actual numbers (or the limits in
> your
> area), so it's difficult to help you further.
>
> If you book a retest at a different facility, or at the same place a week
> later, you may pass without any work done at all to your car. Seriously.
> If
> you fail again, then more attention is needed. Until then I would do
> nothing.
>
> Check out my numbers:
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/...emissions.html
> See the June 2003 NO numbers? I did absolutely nothing except oil changes
> and the usual maintenance between then and 2005, and NO plummetted.
>
>
> --
> TeGGeR®
>
> The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
> www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
HC (PPM)
Limit 136
Emmisions 7
Pass
CO(%)
Limit .73
Emissions .02
Pass
NOx (PPM)
Limit 1591
Emissions 2186
Fail
Does this help at all? I am certainly going to try again at another place
after a long ride there.
Thanks,
Mark
"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in message
news:Xns96924967F2FC0tegger@207.14.113.17...
> "Mark Lewis" <mdlewis@mdlewis.com> wrote in
> news:nZ5Be.136480$mx5.56500@fe08.lga:
>
>> Thanks. Not very comfortable with dumping stuff in the tank... The
>> dealer did check the car out after the failure, would their
>> diagnositics highlighted any of these other items?
>
>
>
> Depends how competent they are in diagnosing failures. Dealers are not
> usually the best place to bring an older car for diagnosis, since they
> specialize in the new stuff.
>
> Also, you have not posted any of your actual numbers (or the limits in
> your
> area), so it's difficult to help you further.
>
> If you book a retest at a different facility, or at the same place a week
> later, you may pass without any work done at all to your car. Seriously.
> If
> you fail again, then more attention is needed. Until then I would do
> nothing.
>
> Check out my numbers:
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/...emissions.html
> See the June 2003 NO numbers? I did absolutely nothing except oil changes
> and the usual maintenance between then and 2005, and NO plummetted.
>
>
> --
> TeGGeR®
>
> The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
> www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 94 Accord Wagon Failed Emmissions - Running Hot?
"Mark Lewis" <mdlewis@mdlewis.com> wrote in
news:UQhBe.1672$2c7.1113@fe11.lga:
> The numbers are:
>
> HC (PPM)
> Limit 136
> Emmisions 7
> Pass
>
> CO(%)
> Limit .73
> Emissions .02
> Pass
>
> NOx (PPM)
> Limit 1591
> Emissions 2186
> Fail
You are running WAY lean according to these numbers.
First step: Take the car in for a retest with NO work done. You have a
better than even chance of passing.
If it fails second time around, check for:
1) A leak in the exhaust before the cat
2) Ignition timing too far advanced
3) EGR valve not opening
4) Lean-biased O2 sensor (replace to check).
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
news:UQhBe.1672$2c7.1113@fe11.lga:
> The numbers are:
>
> HC (PPM)
> Limit 136
> Emmisions 7
> Pass
>
> CO(%)
> Limit .73
> Emissions .02
> Pass
>
> NOx (PPM)
> Limit 1591
> Emissions 2186
> Fail
You are running WAY lean according to these numbers.
First step: Take the car in for a retest with NO work done. You have a
better than even chance of passing.
If it fails second time around, check for:
1) A leak in the exhaust before the cat
2) Ignition timing too far advanced
3) EGR valve not opening
4) Lean-biased O2 sensor (replace to check).
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 94 Accord Wagon Failed Emmissions - Running Hot?
Mark Lewis wrote:
> "TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in message
> news:Xns96924967F2FC0tegger@207.14.113.17...
>
>>"Mark Lewis" <mdlewis@mdlewis.com> wrote in
>>news:nZ5Be.136480$mx5.56500@fe08.lga:
>>
>>
>>>Thanks. Not very comfortable with dumping stuff in the tank... The
>>>dealer did check the car out after the failure, would their
>>>diagnositics highlighted any of these other items?
>>
>>
>>
>>Depends how competent they are in diagnosing failures. Dealers are not
>>usually the best place to bring an older car for diagnosis, since they
>>specialize in the new stuff.
>>
>>Also, you have not posted any of your actual numbers (or the limits in
>>your
>>area), so it's difficult to help you further.
>>
>>If you book a retest at a different facility, or at the same place a week
>>later, you may pass without any work done at all to your car. Seriously.
>>If
>>you fail again, then more attention is needed. Until then I would do
>>nothing.
>>
>>Check out my numbers:
>>http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/...emissions.html
>>See the June 2003 NO numbers? I did absolutely nothing except oil changes
>>and the usual maintenance between then and 2005, and NO plummetted.
>>
>>
>>--
>>TeGGeR®
>>
>>The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
>>www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
>
>
>
> The numbers are:
>
> HC (PPM)
> Limit 136
> Emmisions 7
> Pass
>
> CO(%)
> Limit .73
> Emissions .02
> Pass
>
> NOx (PPM)
> Limit 1591
> Emissions 2186
> Fail
>
> Does this help at all? I am certainly going to try again at another
place
> after a long ride there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
i agree with tegger you're /way/ lean. run a couple of tanks of
injector cleaner through - make sure you do some extended /full
throttle/ hills as part of that. if that doesn't work, go for a new
oxygen sensor. don't re-test while you still have injector cleaner in
there.
> "TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in message
> news:Xns96924967F2FC0tegger@207.14.113.17...
>
>>"Mark Lewis" <mdlewis@mdlewis.com> wrote in
>>news:nZ5Be.136480$mx5.56500@fe08.lga:
>>
>>
>>>Thanks. Not very comfortable with dumping stuff in the tank... The
>>>dealer did check the car out after the failure, would their
>>>diagnositics highlighted any of these other items?
>>
>>
>>
>>Depends how competent they are in diagnosing failures. Dealers are not
>>usually the best place to bring an older car for diagnosis, since they
>>specialize in the new stuff.
>>
>>Also, you have not posted any of your actual numbers (or the limits in
>>your
>>area), so it's difficult to help you further.
>>
>>If you book a retest at a different facility, or at the same place a week
>>later, you may pass without any work done at all to your car. Seriously.
>>If
>>you fail again, then more attention is needed. Until then I would do
>>nothing.
>>
>>Check out my numbers:
>>http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/...emissions.html
>>See the June 2003 NO numbers? I did absolutely nothing except oil changes
>>and the usual maintenance between then and 2005, and NO plummetted.
>>
>>
>>--
>>TeGGeR®
>>
>>The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
>>www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
>
>
>
> The numbers are:
>
> HC (PPM)
> Limit 136
> Emmisions 7
> Pass
>
> CO(%)
> Limit .73
> Emissions .02
> Pass
>
> NOx (PPM)
> Limit 1591
> Emissions 2186
> Fail
>
> Does this help at all? I am certainly going to try again at another
place
> after a long ride there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
i agree with tegger you're /way/ lean. run a couple of tanks of
injector cleaner through - make sure you do some extended /full
throttle/ hills as part of that. if that doesn't work, go for a new
oxygen sensor. don't re-test while you still have injector cleaner in
there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmattis@attglobal.net
Other Car Related Discussions
7
Jul 2, 2005 09:31 AM
RKMT
Other Car Related Discussions
1
May 4, 2005 11:16 AM




