2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
#1
08-16-2005, 09:30 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
Hi,
I am in the market for a new/used(2004-2005) Honda Accord and was
wondering what is the difference between the EX and the LX models?
Also, when would the 2006 Accord be coming out? If anyone has been
closeley following the cars previews is it something to wait for or
better to get the '05 instead? What are the good/bad things in the new
accord?
Lastly I am sure that there would be a unanimous agreement in that the
Accord is wayyy better then the camry (in this group at least), but am
wondering if someone could offer and unbiased opinion as to why is it
better and what (if any) are the drawbacks?
Thank you for your help.
I am in the market for a new/used(2004-2005) Honda Accord and was
wondering what is the difference between the EX and the LX models?
Also, when would the 2006 Accord be coming out? If anyone has been
closeley following the cars previews is it something to wait for or
better to get the '05 instead? What are the good/bad things in the new
accord?
Lastly I am sure that there would be a unanimous agreement in that the
Accord is wayyy better then the camry (in this group at least), but am
wondering if someone could offer and unbiased opinion as to why is it
better and what (if any) are the drawbacks?
Thank you for your help.
#2
08-16-2005, 10:53 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
You will still be in the current generation. Expect only minor
changes. I have never seen a good reason to upgrade within a
generation. The 2006 should be out next month +/-. In my opinion,
now is the time to buy a 2005, not wait for a 2006. There are
significant differences between the LX and EX versions, but it's all
bells and whistles. The basic car is the same. Go to Edmunds
http://www.edmunds.com/ for a complete explanation of the differences.
You can also go to the Honda website http://automobiles.honda.com/ ,
but I like the way Edmunds explains it.
I don't think you will find unanimous agreement that the Accord is
much better than the Camry. Depends on what you are looking for.
Both are very reliable cars, and both hold their value well. The
Honda has a more sporting suspension, and many like its looks better.
The Camry is often described as being more like a Buick in the way it
rides and performs. Either car is an excellent choice.
Dick
2003 EX V-6
On 16 Aug 2005 18:15:51 -0700, dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am in the market for a new/used(2004-2005) Honda Accord and was
>wondering what is the difference between the EX and the LX models?
>
>Also, when would the 2006 Accord be coming out? If anyone has been
>closeley following the cars previews is it something to wait for or
>better to get the '05 instead? What are the good/bad things in the new
>accord?
>
>Lastly I am sure that there would be a unanimous agreement in that the
>Accord is wayyy better then the camry (in this group at least), but am
>wondering if someone could offer and unbiased opinion as to why is it
>better and what (if any) are the drawbacks?
>
>Thank you for your help.
changes. I have never seen a good reason to upgrade within a
generation. The 2006 should be out next month +/-. In my opinion,
now is the time to buy a 2005, not wait for a 2006. There are
significant differences between the LX and EX versions, but it's all
bells and whistles. The basic car is the same. Go to Edmunds
http://www.edmunds.com/ for a complete explanation of the differences.
You can also go to the Honda website http://automobiles.honda.com/ ,
but I like the way Edmunds explains it.
I don't think you will find unanimous agreement that the Accord is
much better than the Camry. Depends on what you are looking for.
Both are very reliable cars, and both hold their value well. The
Honda has a more sporting suspension, and many like its looks better.
The Camry is often described as being more like a Buick in the way it
rides and performs. Either car is an excellent choice.
Dick
2003 EX V-6
On 16 Aug 2005 18:15:51 -0700, dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am in the market for a new/used(2004-2005) Honda Accord and was
>wondering what is the difference between the EX and the LX models?
>
>Also, when would the 2006 Accord be coming out? If anyone has been
>closeley following the cars previews is it something to wait for or
>better to get the '05 instead? What are the good/bad things in the new
>accord?
>
>Lastly I am sure that there would be a unanimous agreement in that the
>Accord is wayyy better then the camry (in this group at least), but am
>wondering if someone could offer and unbiased opinion as to why is it
>better and what (if any) are the drawbacks?
>
>Thank you for your help.
#3
08-16-2005, 10:53 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
In article <1124241351.789072.16200@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups. com>,
dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
> Lastly I am sure that there would be a unanimous agreement in that the
> Accord is wayyy better then the camry (in this group at least), but am
> wondering if someone could offer and unbiased opinion as to why is it
> better and what (if any) are the drawbacks?
I wouldn't say waaaaay better. Different, that's all. If you have to
put it into words, the Honda is typically more of a driver's car and the
Toyota more of a rider's car (some call it the Japanese Buick).
Frankly, it may come down to which dealership is closer to you, or is
better for service.
dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
> Lastly I am sure that there would be a unanimous agreement in that the
> Accord is wayyy better then the camry (in this group at least), but am
> wondering if someone could offer and unbiased opinion as to why is it
> better and what (if any) are the drawbacks?
I wouldn't say waaaaay better. Different, that's all. If you have to
put it into words, the Honda is typically more of a driver's car and the
Toyota more of a rider's car (some call it the Japanese Buick).
Frankly, it may come down to which dealership is closer to you, or is
better for service.
#5
08-16-2005, 11:30 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in the market for a new/used(2004-2005) Honda Accord and was
> wondering what is the difference between the EX and the LX models?
>
I think the EX has 4-wheel disc brakes, while the LX has front discs and
rear drums. The EX also adds a moonroof and some other fancy stuff.
> Also, when would the 2006 Accord be coming out? If anyone has been
> closeley following the cars previews is it something to wait for or
> better to get the '05 instead? What are the good/bad things in the new
> accord?
>
I don't know what changes Honda has planned for the '06 Accord. It was all
new for 2003, so if Honda maintains its usual 5-year cycle, the next
generation of Accord would arrive for 2008. I would imagine the '06 will
come out in the fall, as usual.
> Lastly I am sure that there would be a unanimous agreement in that the
> Accord is wayyy better then the camry (in this group at least), but am
> wondering if someone could offer and unbiased opinion as to why is it
> better and what (if any) are the drawbacks?
>
As I said to another poster recently, Camry has a slightly smoother ride but
Accord has slightly tighter handling. So if ride quality is a higher
priority then handling, then perhaps one should look at a Camry first.
And personally, I think the Camry looks better than the Accord sedan. But
the Accord coupe looks a bit better than the Camry-based Solara coupe.
> Thank you for your help.
No problem.
> Hi,
>
> I am in the market for a new/used(2004-2005) Honda Accord and was
> wondering what is the difference between the EX and the LX models?
>
I think the EX has 4-wheel disc brakes, while the LX has front discs and
rear drums. The EX also adds a moonroof and some other fancy stuff.
> Also, when would the 2006 Accord be coming out? If anyone has been
> closeley following the cars previews is it something to wait for or
> better to get the '05 instead? What are the good/bad things in the new
> accord?
>
I don't know what changes Honda has planned for the '06 Accord. It was all
new for 2003, so if Honda maintains its usual 5-year cycle, the next
generation of Accord would arrive for 2008. I would imagine the '06 will
come out in the fall, as usual.
> Lastly I am sure that there would be a unanimous agreement in that the
> Accord is wayyy better then the camry (in this group at least), but am
> wondering if someone could offer and unbiased opinion as to why is it
> better and what (if any) are the drawbacks?
>
As I said to another poster recently, Camry has a slightly smoother ride but
Accord has slightly tighter handling. So if ride quality is a higher
priority then handling, then perhaps one should look at a Camry first.
And personally, I think the Camry looks better than the Accord sedan. But
the Accord coupe looks a bit better than the Camry-based Solara coupe.
> Thank you for your help.
No problem.
#6
08-17-2005, 03:31 AM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:04:26 -0400, High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net>
wrote:
models?
>>
>I think the EX has 4-wheel disc brakes, while the LX has front discs and
>rear drums. The EX also adds a moonroof and some other fancy stuff.
I'm pretty sure both have 4 wheel discs.
The EX has alloy wheels, the moonroof, and climate control.
You should check out edmunds.com
They have a bottomless pit of information.
Really good site, but you have to poke around a bit.
Cheers, --N
wrote:
models?
>>
>I think the EX has 4-wheel disc brakes, while the LX has front discs and
>rear drums. The EX also adds a moonroof and some other fancy stuff.
I'm pretty sure both have 4 wheel discs.
The EX has alloy wheels, the moonroof, and climate control.
You should check out edmunds.com
They have a bottomless pit of information.
Really good site, but you have to poke around a bit.
Cheers, --N
#7
08-17-2005, 08:34 AM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
noydb wrote:
>>I think the EX has 4-wheel disc brakes, while the LX has front discs and
>>rear drums. The EX also adds a moonroof and some other fancy stuff.
>
> I'm pretty sure both have 4 wheel discs.
> The EX has alloy wheels, the moonroof, and climate control.
>
> You should check out edmunds.com
>
> They have a bottomless pit of information.
> Really good site, but you have to poke around a bit.
>
> Cheers, --N
I just looked on Edmunds, and we were both half right. The LX 4-cylinder
has front discs and rear drums, but the LX V6 has discs on all 4 wheels.
>>I think the EX has 4-wheel disc brakes, while the LX has front discs and
>>rear drums. The EX also adds a moonroof and some other fancy stuff.
>
> I'm pretty sure both have 4 wheel discs.
> The EX has alloy wheels, the moonroof, and climate control.
>
> You should check out edmunds.com
>
> They have a bottomless pit of information.
> Really good site, but you have to poke around a bit.
>
> Cheers, --N
I just looked on Edmunds, and we were both half right. The LX 4-cylinder
has front discs and rear drums, but the LX V6 has discs on all 4 wheels.
#8
08-17-2005, 04:30 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
If the new Hondas are due to come out in Fall does that mean that the
'05s would be on sale at that time? In which case is it advisable to
buy it right now or wait till the new models come out?
- What percent discount from the blue book invoice value would be a
"good price" to buy it for? For example if I am getting a car 5% less
then the listed invoice price on the blue book is that a good deal?
'05s would be on sale at that time? In which case is it advisable to
buy it right now or wait till the new models come out?
- What percent discount from the blue book invoice value would be a
"good price" to buy it for? For example if I am getting a car 5% less
then the listed invoice price on the blue book is that a good deal?
#9
08-17-2005, 05:31 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
You need to keep lookin' at the Edmunds web-site. Sometimes, dealers
will be given an incentive of $500 to $1000 to get rid-off older models
etc., You need to know this, before you go. Also, watch the newspapers.
Sometimes they advertise the sale price -- sometimes, absolute minimum.
Invoice price is one thing, but you need to look at dealer's incentive,
too.
will be given an incentive of $500 to $1000 to get rid-off older models
etc., You need to know this, before you go. Also, watch the newspapers.
Sometimes they advertise the sale price -- sometimes, absolute minimum.
Invoice price is one thing, but you need to look at dealer's incentive,
too.
#10
08-18-2005, 02:41 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
On 16 Aug 2005 18:15:51 -0700, dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am in the market for a new/used(2004-2005) Honda Accord and was
>wondering what is the difference between the EX and the LX models?
>
>Also, when would the 2006 Accord be coming out? If anyone has been
>closeley following the cars previews is it something to wait for or
>better to get the '05 instead? What are the good/bad things in the new
>accord?
>
>Lastly I am sure that there would be a unanimous agreement in that the
>Accord is wayyy better then the camry (in this group at least), but am
>wondering if someone could offer and unbiased opinion as to why is it
>better and what (if any) are the drawbacks?
>
>Thank you for your help.
You can check the following URL for the 2006 brochure and all of the
features the 06 will have including LED lights, a revised rear for the
sedan, and a slight boost in HP.
http://www.vtec.net/forums/one-messa...sage_id=389734
Nick
>Hi,
>
>I am in the market for a new/used(2004-2005) Honda Accord and was
>wondering what is the difference between the EX and the LX models?
>
>Also, when would the 2006 Accord be coming out? If anyone has been
>closeley following the cars previews is it something to wait for or
>better to get the '05 instead? What are the good/bad things in the new
>accord?
>
>Lastly I am sure that there would be a unanimous agreement in that the
>Accord is wayyy better then the camry (in this group at least), but am
>wondering if someone could offer and unbiased opinion as to why is it
>better and what (if any) are the drawbacks?
>
>Thank you for your help.
You can check the following URL for the 2006 brochure and all of the
features the 06 will have including LED lights, a revised rear for the
sedan, and a slight boost in HP.
http://www.vtec.net/forums/one-messa...sage_id=389734
Nick
#11
08-19-2005, 09:51 AM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
Hi,
A couple of questions:
- So I like the 2006 Accord.. the question being again, when the new
cars come out would their MSRP be the same as the '05 Accords right
now? and would the '05 Accords go down in price? or would the '05
Accords be about the same price as now and the '06 Accord be at a
higher price?
- I found a 2004 Accord that I like with the lucrative reason being
that whoever bought the car had bought a 10 year bumper-to-bumpuer
warranty with it. Its a 2004 Accord EXL. When I am factoring in the
pric I want to know approximately how much would the 10 year warranty
cost? Also, when I purchase a used car how do I pay tax on it? (I am
in New York City).
Thanks again for all your help.. much appreciated.
A couple of questions:
- So I like the 2006 Accord.. the question being again, when the new
cars come out would their MSRP be the same as the '05 Accords right
now? and would the '05 Accords go down in price? or would the '05
Accords be about the same price as now and the '06 Accord be at a
higher price?
- I found a 2004 Accord that I like with the lucrative reason being
that whoever bought the car had bought a 10 year bumper-to-bumpuer
warranty with it. Its a 2004 Accord EXL. When I am factoring in the
pric I want to know approximately how much would the 10 year warranty
cost? Also, when I purchase a used car how do I pay tax on it? (I am
in New York City).
Thanks again for all your help.. much appreciated.
#12
08-19-2005, 10:30 AM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
<dufffman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1124457566.101291.325790@g49g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>
> - So I like the 2006 Accord.. the question being again, when the new
> cars come out would their MSRP be the same as the '05 Accords right
> now? and would the '05 Accords go down in price? or would the '05
> Accords be about the same price as now and the '06 Accord be at a
> higher price?
The '06 should be "about" the same MSRP the '05 was. Maybe a small
difference. How much they mark down an '05 may be a moot point by then.
How many do you think they will have left? It's not like with GM where they
have tons of previous model year vehicles sitting around.
> - I found a 2004 Accord that I like with the lucrative reason being
> that whoever bought the car had bought a 10 year bumper-to-bumpuer
> warranty with it. Its a 2004 Accord EXL. When I am factoring in the
> pric I want to know approximately how much would the 10 year warranty
> cost? Also, when I purchase a used car how do I pay tax on it? (I am
> in New York City).
Tax is paid when you go to register/transfer title at the NYC DMV based on
A) tax rate for where you are registering the car and B) price stated on the
bill of sale you present.
news:1124457566.101291.325790@g49g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>
> - So I like the 2006 Accord.. the question being again, when the new
> cars come out would their MSRP be the same as the '05 Accords right
> now? and would the '05 Accords go down in price? or would the '05
> Accords be about the same price as now and the '06 Accord be at a
> higher price?
The '06 should be "about" the same MSRP the '05 was. Maybe a small
difference. How much they mark down an '05 may be a moot point by then.
How many do you think they will have left? It's not like with GM where they
have tons of previous model year vehicles sitting around.
> - I found a 2004 Accord that I like with the lucrative reason being
> that whoever bought the car had bought a 10 year bumper-to-bumpuer
> warranty with it. Its a 2004 Accord EXL. When I am factoring in the
> pric I want to know approximately how much would the 10 year warranty
> cost? Also, when I purchase a used car how do I pay tax on it? (I am
> in New York City).
Tax is paid when you go to register/transfer title at the NYC DMV based on
A) tax rate for where you are registering the car and B) price stated on the
bill of sale you present.
#14
08-19-2005, 04:34 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
> - I found a 2004 Accord that I like with the lucrative reason being
> that whoever bought the car had bought a 10 year bumper-to-bumpuer
> warranty with it. Its a 2004 Accord EXL. When I am factoring in the
> pric I want to know approximately how much would the 10 year warranty
> cost?
is it the hondacare warranty? or some shitty fly-by-night aftermarket
"warranty". how many miles on the car? how many miles is the warranty
good for? 100k? how much do you drive?
> - I found a 2004 Accord that I like with the lucrative reason being
> that whoever bought the car had bought a 10 year bumper-to-bumpuer
> warranty with it. Its a 2004 Accord EXL. When I am factoring in the
> pric I want to know approximately how much would the 10 year warranty
> cost?
is it the hondacare warranty? or some shitty fly-by-night aftermarket
"warranty". how many miles on the car? how many miles is the warranty
good for? 100k? how much do you drive?
#15
08-19-2005, 04:34 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
> Anyone have any idea how much a 10 year bumper-to-bumper warranty costs
> on a Honda Accord?
>
> THanks,
>
from $800 on up, depending on how bad the dealer screwed the original
owner. my g/f was offered a 7 yr extended warranty (first 3 covered by
OEM warranty, anyway) for "only $30/mo"
do the math on a 5 yr note... $30x 60= $1800. i said hell no, and they
immediately dropped it to $600. she ended up taking it. i wouldnt have,
but hey- its her car. and i saved her $1200 right off the bat.
> Anyone have any idea how much a 10 year bumper-to-bumper warranty costs
> on a Honda Accord?
>
> THanks,
>
from $800 on up, depending on how bad the dealer screwed the original
owner. my g/f was offered a 7 yr extended warranty (first 3 covered by
OEM warranty, anyway) for "only $30/mo"
do the math on a 5 yr note... $30x 60= $1800. i said hell no, and they
immediately dropped it to $600. she ended up taking it. i wouldnt have,
but hey- its her car. and i saved her $1200 right off the bat.
#16
08-19-2005, 05:30 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:12:39 -0700, SoCalMike
<mikein562athotmail@hotmail.com> wrote:
>dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
>> Anyone have any idea how much a 10 year bumper-to-bumper warranty costs
>> on a Honda Accord?
>>
>> THanks,
>>
>
>from $800 on up, depending on how bad the dealer screwed the original
>owner. my g/f was offered a 7 yr extended warranty (first 3 covered by
>OEM warranty, anyway) for "only $30/mo"
>
>do the math on a 5 yr note... $30x 60= $1800. i said hell no, and they
>immediately dropped it to $600. she ended up taking it. i wouldnt have,
>but hey- its her car. and i saved her $1200 right off the bat.
Anyone who pays attention knows that extended warranties are cash-cows
for the companies. Ever notice how often you get asked now on the
most trivial of purchases? Even things that only cost $30 or so? It
is well known that extended warranties often make more profit for the
companies than profit on the product itself. In the long term, it is
not a cost-effective purchase.
Think in terms of buying a car. Let's say you negotiate a deal down
to $500 profit for the dealer. Then he tacks on a $1,000 extended
warranty. Which do you think will earn the dealer more money? I
would NEVER buy an extended warranty on a new vehicle.
Dick
<mikein562athotmail@hotmail.com> wrote:
>dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
>> Anyone have any idea how much a 10 year bumper-to-bumper warranty costs
>> on a Honda Accord?
>>
>> THanks,
>>
>
>from $800 on up, depending on how bad the dealer screwed the original
>owner. my g/f was offered a 7 yr extended warranty (first 3 covered by
>OEM warranty, anyway) for "only $30/mo"
>
>do the math on a 5 yr note... $30x 60= $1800. i said hell no, and they
>immediately dropped it to $600. she ended up taking it. i wouldnt have,
>but hey- its her car. and i saved her $1200 right off the bat.
Anyone who pays attention knows that extended warranties are cash-cows
for the companies. Ever notice how often you get asked now on the
most trivial of purchases? Even things that only cost $30 or so? It
is well known that extended warranties often make more profit for the
companies than profit on the product itself. In the long term, it is
not a cost-effective purchase.
Think in terms of buying a car. Let's say you negotiate a deal down
to $500 profit for the dealer. Then he tacks on a $1,000 extended
warranty. Which do you think will earn the dealer more money? I
would NEVER buy an extended warranty on a new vehicle.
Dick
#17
08-19-2005, 06:48 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
Dick wrote:
>
> Think in terms of buying a car. Let's say you negotiate a deal down
> to $500 profit for the dealer. Then he tacks on a $1,000 extended
> warranty. Which do you think will earn the dealer more money? I
> would NEVER buy an extended warranty on a new vehicle.
i wouldnt either, especially on a honda or toyota. doubly especially on
a configuration that has an excellent track record. i bet the people
that got extended warranties on honda v6/automatic are happy
>
> Think in terms of buying a car. Let's say you negotiate a deal down
> to $500 profit for the dealer. Then he tacks on a $1,000 extended
> warranty. Which do you think will earn the dealer more money? I
> would NEVER buy an extended warranty on a new vehicle.
i wouldnt either, especially on a honda or toyota. doubly especially on
a configuration that has an excellent track record. i bet the people
that got extended warranties on honda v6/automatic are happy
#18
08-19-2005, 06:48 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:02:50 -0700, SoCalMike
<mikein562athotmail@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Dick wrote:
>>
>> Think in terms of buying a car. Let's say you negotiate a deal down
>> to $500 profit for the dealer. Then he tacks on a $1,000 extended
>> warranty. Which do you think will earn the dealer more money? I
>> would NEVER buy an extended warranty on a new vehicle.
>
>i wouldnt either, especially on a honda or toyota. doubly especially on
>a configuration that has an excellent track record. i bet the people
>that got extended warranties on honda v6/automatic are happy
Well, I had a '99 EX V-6 and now a '03 EX V-6 and have not had one
minute of trouble with either one. Put a total of about 90,000 miles
on them. I know some people have had problems, but luckily not me.
In fact, the only problem I had with either of them was a leaky roof
railing trim strip in the '03. Just made it under the warranty
period.
Dick
<mikein562athotmail@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Dick wrote:
>>
>> Think in terms of buying a car. Let's say you negotiate a deal down
>> to $500 profit for the dealer. Then he tacks on a $1,000 extended
>> warranty. Which do you think will earn the dealer more money? I
>> would NEVER buy an extended warranty on a new vehicle.
>
>i wouldnt either, especially on a honda or toyota. doubly especially on
>a configuration that has an excellent track record. i bet the people
>that got extended warranties on honda v6/automatic are happy
Well, I had a '99 EX V-6 and now a '03 EX V-6 and have not had one
minute of trouble with either one. Put a total of about 90,000 miles
on them. I know some people have had problems, but luckily not me.
In fact, the only problem I had with either of them was a leaky roof
railing trim strip in the '03. Just made it under the warranty
period.
Dick
#19
08-20-2005, 10:30 AM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
In article <1124545616.476039.235490@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups .com>,
dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
> and mike what do u mean when you say
> > i bet the people
> > that got extended warranties on honda v6/automatic are happy
> so are you saying that its good to get an extended warranty on an
> automatic V6 or are you saying that the automatic V6's are crap?
Until mid-2004 model year, Honda's auto trans that they put on their V6
engines were crap. Plain and simple.
dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
> and mike what do u mean when you say
> > i bet the people
> > that got extended warranties on honda v6/automatic are happy
> so are you saying that its good to get an extended warranty on an
> automatic V6 or are you saying that the automatic V6's are crap?
Until mid-2004 model year, Honda's auto trans that they put on their V6
engines were crap. Plain and simple.
#20
08-20-2005, 10:30 AM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2006 accord? difference between EX and LX?
On 8/20/05 8:46 AM, in article
1124545616.476039.235490@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups. com, "dufffman@gmail.com"
<dufffman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your replies.. I was still a little confused by your
> replies. You guys vehemently oppose extended warranties, but is it
> really a bad idea to have everything in your car covered for a $1000
> more bucks? I mean, if anything goes wrong with your car you end up
> spending at a few hundred on it. And in Mike's case, a 7 year warranty
> for $600 bucks? I understand that the dealer makes money on it, but
> what do YOU really lose? A peace of mind for the next 10 years, and if
> nothing goes wrong, you still only paid 600 bucks, rite?
The only thing I have ever spent any where near $600 to repair on Hondas has
been the timing belt and the extended warranties don't cover that.
>
> And in simple terms would I be better off buying a new accord '05 rite
> now, or wait till next month when the '06's come out for a better deal?
>
The '05 will be immediately a one year old car. The line of reasoning here
should be about how long you plan to keep it. If you are thinking two or
three years, you will lose an extra year's worth of depreciation when you go
to trade it. If you plan to keep it forever (forever is about 5 years),
that doesn't come into play and you should go with the best price you can
get.
> thank you very much!
> ANd as dick said he just made it under the warranty period in '03. If
> he hadn't what would your cost to fix that glitch have been?
>
> I appreciate your replies and am not trying to discount them by any
> means. I just dont know too much about cars (its the first car I am
> buying) and am thinking from different perspectives as to what would be
> the best thing to do.
>
> and mike what do u mean when you say
>> i bet the people
>> that got extended warranties on honda v6/automatic are happy
> so are you saying that its good to get an extended warranty on an
> automatic V6 or are you saying that the automatic V6's are crap? Maybe
> I am a little too drunk from friday nite, but I believe that you were
> talking about how warrnty SHOULDN'T be purchased, so why the switch?
>
I find this comment confusing as well. Honda extended the warranty on the
transmissions that have problem potential to 7 years/100,000 miles, so an
aftermarket extended warranty would be pointless for this purpose.
>
> I am very close to buying a car and
>
1124545616.476039.235490@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups. com, "dufffman@gmail.com"
<dufffman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your replies.. I was still a little confused by your
> replies. You guys vehemently oppose extended warranties, but is it
> really a bad idea to have everything in your car covered for a $1000
> more bucks? I mean, if anything goes wrong with your car you end up
> spending at a few hundred on it. And in Mike's case, a 7 year warranty
> for $600 bucks? I understand that the dealer makes money on it, but
> what do YOU really lose? A peace of mind for the next 10 years, and if
> nothing goes wrong, you still only paid 600 bucks, rite?
The only thing I have ever spent any where near $600 to repair on Hondas has
been the timing belt and the extended warranties don't cover that.
>
> And in simple terms would I be better off buying a new accord '05 rite
> now, or wait till next month when the '06's come out for a better deal?
>
The '05 will be immediately a one year old car. The line of reasoning here
should be about how long you plan to keep it. If you are thinking two or
three years, you will lose an extra year's worth of depreciation when you go
to trade it. If you plan to keep it forever (forever is about 5 years),
that doesn't come into play and you should go with the best price you can
get.
> thank you very much!
> ANd as dick said he just made it under the warranty period in '03. If
> he hadn't what would your cost to fix that glitch have been?
>
> I appreciate your replies and am not trying to discount them by any
> means. I just dont know too much about cars (its the first car I am
> buying) and am thinking from different perspectives as to what would be
> the best thing to do.
>
> and mike what do u mean when you say
>> i bet the people
>> that got extended warranties on honda v6/automatic are happy
> so are you saying that its good to get an extended warranty on an
> automatic V6 or are you saying that the automatic V6's are crap? Maybe
> I am a little too drunk from friday nite, but I believe that you were
> talking about how warrnty SHOULDN'T be purchased, so why the switch?
>
I find this comment confusing as well. Honda extended the warranty on the
transmissions that have problem potential to 7 years/100,000 miles, so an
aftermarket extended warranty would be pointless for this purpose.
>
> I am very close to buying a car and
>