Out goes the fit Here Comes the TL
#1
Out goes the fit Here Comes the TL
After very careful consideration with expecting a bigger family and needing a bigger car i decided to trade my fit in for the TL Let me know what you guys think?
#5
Originally Posted by sLiVeRwOrM
wow.. hmm.. how many miles were on the Fit? Id like an SS supercharge ;)
I left the springs. They offer to give me the springs back if whoever they sell the car to decides they didnt want the springs..
Last edited by XBriteHID; 09-11-2006 at 12:10 AM.
#11
Originally Posted by XBriteHID
I will definately miss the 20 dollar fill - ups. I'm still trying to milk the hell out of the tank the dealership filled for me
LOl see how long that last..
LOl see how long that last..
Check out http://www.acurazine.com
nice car
#13
Originally Posted by LuxuryFit
You do know Acura is doing major face lift/Hp gain for
2007 TL ???
Just checking.
I would have kept the Fit as a second car.
Why not have both?
2007 TL ???
Just checking.
I would have kept the Fit as a second car.
Why not have both?
#14
I don't see the appeal of the TL at all - what is the point of a 4-cyl that gets such bad fuel mileage :rolleyes: . We all know Honda can do much better - look at the Accord.
I would not feel right driving such a vehicle. Of course it is much better than an SUV. ;)
I would not feel right driving such a vehicle. Of course it is much better than an SUV. ;)
#15
Originally Posted by DRum
I don't see the appeal of the TL at all - what is the point of a 4-cyl that gets such bad fuel mileage :rolleyes: . We all know Honda can do much better - look at the Accord.
I would not feel right driving such a vehicle. Of course it is much better than an SUV. ;)
I would not feel right driving such a vehicle. Of course it is much better than an SUV. ;)
ITS A V6 NOT AN I4.... :confused:
#17
OOps - I did confuse the TSX. I think the TL gets about the same mpg with the V-6 as the TSX with the 4, plus the TL has a lot more room. The TSX has less room than the Fit in many ways.
Speaking of cars I don't get. The new SUV from Acura really has me stumped. 24 mpg with a 4-cyl, when a car like the TL gets 29 with a powerful V-6. If they only made a wagon version of the TL (or Accord, or Civic) it would have as much (or more room) than that thing with more power and better mpg. Especially if they made the wagon as space efficient as the Fit.
Speaking of cars I don't get. The new SUV from Acura really has me stumped. 24 mpg with a 4-cyl, when a car like the TL gets 29 with a powerful V-6. If they only made a wagon version of the TL (or Accord, or Civic) it would have as much (or more room) than that thing with more power and better mpg. Especially if they made the wagon as space efficient as the Fit.
#20
Actually the RDX gets 19/23 mpg (at least on the Acura web site). That is a lot of gas for a 4-cyl - especially when a RAV 4 gets 21/28 with a 270hp 3.5 liter V-6.
I know the Acura probably handles better - just talking about efficiency, or lack thereof.
Not trying to highjack the thread - the TL is a nice vehicle. I like that they make a stick shift available.
I know the Acura probably handles better - just talking about efficiency, or lack thereof.
Not trying to highjack the thread - the TL is a nice vehicle. I like that they make a stick shift available.