mpg at 55?
mpg at 55?
I poked around but could not find it quickly...
what mpg are you getting cruising at 55? here in upstate ny, many highways/parkways are 55 and i was just wondering what I could be getting....
what mpg are you getting cruising at 55? here in upstate ny, many highways/parkways are 55 and i was just wondering what I could be getting....
Why so?
Air resistance is defined by coefficient of drag times frontal surface area, which for both cars would be identical. The fact that your car is lowered may or may not help overall air resistance.
Maybe if it's lower, less air is able to bypass it underneath creating extra pressure in the front forcing air to go around and above the body. But maybe less air under the car also means less turbulence...
I think it's hard to say. What's your reasoning?
Air resistance is defined by coefficient of drag times frontal surface area, which for both cars would be identical. The fact that your car is lowered may or may not help overall air resistance.
Maybe if it's lower, less air is able to bypass it underneath creating extra pressure in the front forcing air to go around and above the body. But maybe less air under the car also means less turbulence...
I think it's hard to say. What's your reasoning?
Why so?
Air resistance is defined by coefficient of drag times frontal surface area, which for both cars would be identical. The fact that your car is lowered may or may not help overall air resistance.
Maybe if it's lower, less air is able to bypass it underneath creating extra pressure in the front forcing air to go around and above the body. But maybe less air under the car also means less turbulence...
I think it's hard to say. What's your reasoning?
Air resistance is defined by coefficient of drag times frontal surface area, which for both cars would be identical. The fact that your car is lowered may or may not help overall air resistance.
Maybe if it's lower, less air is able to bypass it underneath creating extra pressure in the front forcing air to go around and above the body. But maybe less air under the car also means less turbulence...
I think it's hard to say. What's your reasoning?
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,251
From: Winthrop Harbor Illinois/ Presque Isle Wisconsin

Now consider that the bottom of yer car (with all the chassis parts, exhaust etc) is the least aerodynamic by a fairly large margin.
how many miles did you have at the time?
I heard from many gd owners that 10k is the final mark where the mileage peaks and holds. perhaps the ge is similar.
also, what was the increase? thanks.
isn't that why body kits were originally designed for? air flow? I remember top gear mention something like this...
I heard from many gd owners that 10k is the final mark where the mileage peaks and holds. perhaps the ge is similar.
also, what was the increase? thanks.
isn't that why body kits were originally designed for? air flow? I remember top gear mention something like this...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BoostTed
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
17
Dec 20, 2010 12:38 AM





