2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

What's With The Irrational Hate For This Car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #41  
bigcanoe's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 83
From: Moncure, NC
5 Year Member
I brought my new car home, and my wife and son immediately expressed their dislike. "Its a box, why did you get that boring color". Sigh.
 
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 06:51 PM
  #42  
Lyon[Nightroad]'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,827
From: North Cackalacky
5 Year Member
Lol I am told by everyone that orange is the soccer mom color... There is no winning. Silver is borring. Light blue is gay. White is fleet car. Red is wanna be race car color. Dark blue is too gaudy. Black is wanna be VIP/Balla status. Purple is the chick color. Etc.etc. There is always something for people to hate.
 
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 06:52 PM
  #43  
hogwylde's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,355
From: Massachusetts
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by bigcanoe
I brought my new car home, and my wife and son immediately expressed their dislike. "Its a box, why did you get that boring color". Sigh.
That's actually good news for you. Now there's no need for them to borrow it!
 
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 07:37 PM
  #44  
accordguyintake's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,279
From: Garden Grove, CA
5 Year Member
lol i think we all fit owners should just mod their fits, like how almost every scion i see is fitted with some kind of wheels, we should follow the trend. When i first got my car no one liked it and EVERYONE bagged on my color choice. Dropped it, got some wheels and blacked the headlights... voila! most people seem to like it now

jk i think people these days are just ignorant... totally not open to the unknown and unfamiliar, it's a shame really oh and lots of them are such stereotypes... People are always trying to race me just cuz i own a honda... sigh its disgusting
 
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #45  
citabria7's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 405
From: Phoenix
Remember...half the world is below average in intelligence. The other half either have, or will have a Fit.
 
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #46  
Type 100's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,888
From: Parañaque City, Philippines
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by citabria7
Remember...half the world is below average in intelligence. The other half either have, or will have a Fit.


+Rep for you!
 
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 10:45 PM
  #47  
polaski's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 548
From: USA
I felt the same way as wilcoholic for a while... then I would move a dining room table or a big laser printer when (random person)'s SUV wouldn't hold it; or some random idiot would try to tailgate in the corners and learn that extra mass isn't always a good thing; or someone would walk up to me when I'm buying pizza and truly be interested on what this odd vehicle is and be mesmerized at how useful it actually is.

No, it isn't the perfect car for everyone. It can't dazzle in the quarter mile, it doesn't get fifty mpg in the hands of the average driver, it isn't impervious to winds, it isn't silent, it rattles, it's bumpy, the radio is simple, and the climate control system is almost entirely manually operated.

It is the perfect car for me. It doesn't suck enough fuel to dazzle in the quarter mile, it isn't slow enough to get fifty mpg (unless you want it to be), it's tall enough to be comfortable, it's quieter than many cars, there isn't enough foam and insulation and heavy carpet to weigh it down excessively, the stiff tires and suspension give it great cornering ability, the radio is easy to use on the road, and the sheer lack of computer-driven electronic or vacuum components in the car makes it nearly entirely user-serviceable, if they ever break down at all.

It is what it is. If you feel you deserve a computer driven autobot that regulates its own air temperature, tells you if you're tailgating or being passed, hits the brakes before you do and the wipers before the road gets wet, can see in the dark, and tells you there are 186.1 miles left in your tank of gas, then the Fit is not for you. However, if you have enough brains and know-how to DRIVE the car and not just ride and share in the automobile experience, the Fit may be for you.
 

Last edited by polaski; Dec 8, 2009 at 10:50 PM.
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 11:23 PM
  #48  
Texas Coyote's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,388
From: Anderson County Texas
5 Year Member
If you don't like driving a car like the Fit you must not like driving.... The world would be a safer friendlier place if the people that think they need a truck that carries 6 or 10 passengers relied on public transportation or stayed home.... The Fit is the best Euro Car made in Japan and sold in the U.S.
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 03:20 AM
  #49  
Type 100's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,888
From: Parañaque City, Philippines
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by polaski
I felt the same way as wilcoholic for a while... then I would move a dining room table or a big laser printer when (random person)'s SUV wouldn't hold it; or some random idiot would try to tailgate in the corners and learn that extra mass isn't always a good thing; or someone would walk up to me when I'm buying pizza and truly be interested on what this odd vehicle is and be mesmerized at how useful it actually is.

No, it isn't the perfect car for everyone. It can't dazzle in the quarter mile, it doesn't get fifty mpg in the hands of the average driver, it isn't impervious to winds, it isn't silent, it rattles, it's bumpy, the radio is simple, and the climate control system is almost entirely manually operated.

It is the perfect car for me. It doesn't suck enough fuel to dazzle in the quarter mile, it isn't slow enough to get fifty mpg (unless you want it to be), it's tall enough to be comfortable, it's quieter than many cars, there isn't enough foam and insulation and heavy carpet to weigh it down excessively, the stiff tires and suspension give it great cornering ability, the radio is easy to use on the road, and the sheer lack of computer-driven electronic or vacuum components in the car makes it nearly entirely user-serviceable, if they ever break down at all.

It is what it is. If you feel you deserve a computer driven autobot that regulates its own air temperature, tells you if you're tailgating or being passed, hits the brakes before you do and the wipers before the road gets wet, can see in the dark, and tells you there are 186.1 miles left in your tank of gas, then the Fit is not for you. However, if you have enough brains and know-how to DRIVE the car and not just ride and share in the automobile experience, the Fit may be for you.
This reminds me of how lowly CNET rated the GD3 Fit. Now CNET is a technology website, so they rate cars in terms of how much tech they pack. True enough, the bare-bones mechanical appeal of the Fit didn't win it any friends there.

The user comments section though had its share of stalwart Fit defenders.
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 03:45 AM
  #50  
HONDAMATIC's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,850
From: hawaii
my friend got me back some dealer books for the GE and im so jealous of the stuff they have for them.. maybe time to buy a GE huh
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 04:22 AM
  #51  
Texas Coyote's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,388
From: Anderson County Texas
5 Year Member
The high tech crap is insulating the driver from the experience of pure unadulterated driving, and weighing these cool little cars down with to much crap and killing performance...The US gets the crappiest versions of the Fit and people still want to put more crap on and in their car and then bitch about how it isn't as fast as some red neck's Trans Am from 0 to 60
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 04:26 AM
  #52  
Lyon[Nightroad]'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,827
From: North Cackalacky
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Texas Coyote
The high tech crap is insulating the driver from the experience of pure unadulterated driving, and weighing these cool little cars down with to much crap and killing performance...The US gets the crappiest versions of the Fit and people still want to put more crap on and in their car and then bitch about how it isn't as fast as some red neck's Trans Am from 0 to 60
You mean the subwoofers DON'T make the car go faster? I thought by pointing the subwoofers towards the back of the car all that acoustic energy was good for like + 15hp. About +25hp if a good song comes on.
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 08:16 AM
  #53  
citabria7's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 405
From: Phoenix
Huh? I thought the subwoofers made it go faster. I put flames on my Solstice, and it definately worked. They heat up the air in front, creating less wind resistance. Gives better mileage too!
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 08:43 AM
  #54  
Selden's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 837
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by Type 100
This reminds me of how lowly CNET rated the GD3 Fit. Now CNET is a technology website, so they rate cars in terms of how much tech they pack. True enough, the bare-bones mechanical appeal of the Fit didn't win it any friends there.
Bare bones??? My first Honda car had an air-cooled engine (no radiator, hoses, or water pump), 4-speed constant mesh (no synchronizers) transmission, a 45mm carburetor, points and condensor ignition, cable operated throttle and clutch, no radio, no power steering, crank windows, perhaps 6 fuses total, and weighed about 1600 pounds. I'm pretty sure that the only electric motors in the entire car were for the windshield wipers, heater fan, and the fuel pump. I could do just about any maintenance (including swapping out the camshaft) with the toolkit that came with the car and a set of sockets.

That was bare bones. Other than the Tata Nano, and perhaps some cars built in Russia and China, I don't think there are any bare bones cars being built these days.
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #55  
Type 100's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,888
From: Parañaque City, Philippines
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Selden
Bare bones??? My first Honda car had an air-cooled engine (no radiator, hoses, or water pump), 4-speed constant mesh (no synchronizers) transmission, a 45mm carburetor, points and condensor ignition, cable operated throttle and clutch, no radio, no power steering, crank windows, perhaps 6 fuses total, and weighed about 1600 pounds. I'm pretty sure that the only electric motors in the entire car were for the windshield wipers, heater fan, and the fuel pump. I could do just about any maintenance (including swapping out the camshaft) with the toolkit that came with the car and a set of sockets.

That was bare bones. Other than the Tata Nano, and perhaps some cars built in Russia and China, I don't think there are any bare bones cars being built these days.
A "bare bones car" to CNET means no nav, no fancy climate control, no tech toys, no iPod connection, no massaging seats... It's relative I guess. But yes I see your point!

Where I live, we make do without in-car navigation systems. For most people, as long as the electric windows and aircon work, it's all good
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 10:14 AM
  #56  
citabria7's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 405
From: Phoenix
Bare bones? Let's see..standard A/C, power windows and mirrors, CD player, rear wiper and washer. A lot of that is higher cost optiona on most other brands. I think what bothers the techies and Greenies is that we have a full gas powered car that gets mileage as good as many hybrids. Kinda spoils their day..and life.
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #57  
Texas Coyote's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,388
From: Anderson County Texas
5 Year Member
The most bare bones car I owned was a 58 Fiat 500.... IT was also frighteningly slow... The best was a few VW Things which I normally drove with the wind shield down and the doors removed... My son still owns a Thing but is spoiled to the max by his Ridgeline and RSX.
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #58  
handymus's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 142
From: Kaneohe, HI
Fit Fleet

Ok, so we own 2 fits and park them in the same driveway. We usually get comments about having a Fit Fleet or something like that. We had relatives over the other night and we got another one of those comments, with the "roll eyes" type of thing.

I just looked at them and said that the cars are great, good gas mileage and loads of storage, and most of all fun to drive.

Ever since I put the Classio seat covers in my fit...all the haters at work shut up.

If I wanted to impress anyone, I would have kept my gas guzzling v8 Mustang a while back. My high school age boys, love cars - and love the fit.

There will always be haters. F-them. 'nuff said.
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 07:31 PM
  #59  
fareastgq's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 76
From: USA
fit = cool, the only thing missing from my fit that wasn't in my MDX is all wheel drive/ 4 wheel drive and a rear back up cam that works with the nav. The rest is pretty much the same. Doesn't matter to me if auto or I have to do it manually. My mdx didn't have the shift paddles though, or the usb and aux jack, granted, it was a 2004, but come on, in 2004, we alrdy had flash drives and mp3's.... that 6 disc cd changer was the dumbest thing in that mdx.
 
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 11:16 PM
  #60  
calrose rice's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 150
From: From Bremerton WA, Living in California
A box? The Fit is not boxy at all! If you wanted a box you could have gotten a Scion XB...
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 PM.