2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Any GE owner here also have a very fast weekend car and/or sportbike?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 03-30-2011, 03:16 AM
j1nNju1c3's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 1,497
Whats up Doc! I work in a hospital too so I can relate in a way I guess...Haven't seen a doctor with a GT-R though...Lots of Range Rovers, Porsches and BMW's.

And since I drive from San Diego to LA quite frequently, I can say that the Fit has enough power to keep up with the other cars. My normal cruising speed is 80-up but this is tolerable because I have an auto which means I cruise at 3k RPM and loud music
Going from LA to SD though is a different story. Cars usually go 90+ and the Fit is GO. Trust me, you'll love cruising in it.
 
  #22  
Old 03-30-2011, 04:22 AM
SteveInNC's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 124
Originally Posted by gsx-r35
Thanks for the replies guys! I forgot to mention that I've test-driven an auto Fit before when my sister was considering one but I guess I'm gonna have to give the 5MT a go then.

Another question I had is, has anyone found the Fit wanting in the mountains when loaded up, like say with three or four passengers? I drive to San Diego and LA frequently which means going through mountain passes to get there.
I drive up the I-40 Old Fort Mountain grade in NC on a fairly regular basis. It has a four-mile continuous uphill section at about 8% grade, speed-limited to 55mph. I have a 2009 MT Fit and it pulls the hill OK with me, luggage, and a load of five-peoples' Xmas gifts. At worst, you might have to downshift a gear. If the speed limit was higher, probably not even then because the engine would be higher in the power. Most interstate design grades are maxed at 6%, but some like Old Fort were grand-fathered in.
 
  #23  
Old 03-30-2011, 04:40 AM
Lyon[Nightroad]'s Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Cackalacky
Posts: 1,827
Originally Posted by z06dustin
I run a Z06 for the weekends. Fit makes a good DD... but you're right it's definitely no ball of fire. Even if you FI it, you're still looking at something that would be hard pressed to do less than 15 in a 1/4mi, and will prolly never pull more than 1g on a skidpad.
This is now a GT-R vs Vette thread.
 
  #24  
Old 03-30-2011, 01:17 PM
z06dustin's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHX
Posts: 189
Originally Posted by Lyon[Nightroad]
This is now a GT-R vs Vette thread.
Did not mean to turn it into one at all... I respect both cars a lot.

My only point was/is: Fit is an excellent DD. Comfortable. Uber cheap to operate. Can carry a ton of stuff. Relatively safe (side/curtain airbags etc). Just don't buy it an expect crazy performance. OP says:

so I'm worried about buying a small car like the Fit and finding it too lacking in the power department
Dude... it's an econobox. It can merge on the freeway, other than that stock it's not going to win any laurels stoplight to stoplight. So if you want something that is still exciting (acceleration wise, comparable to the other cars you referenced) a 114hp car is probably not up your ally. But go drive an auto and a manual (if you can find one, I have a manual, think it's fun to tick through the gears but that's just me) and see if it's quick enough to get you through the day or not.
 
  #25  
Old 03-30-2011, 02:04 PM
mike410b's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: .
Posts: 7,549
Originally Posted by Lyon[Nightroad]
This is now a GT-R vs Vette thread.
I HATE Corvettes and I'd still take one over a GT-R everyday of the week.
 
  #26  
Old 03-30-2011, 02:16 PM
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 4,424
Originally Posted by mike410b
I HATE Corvettes and I'd still take one over a GT-R everyday of the week.

I like the techno-wizardy and onboard telemetry of the R35... but I love the raw driving experience of the C5/C6 Vettes, they are sharp and direct with oversteer on demand and just the noise is intoxicating.

The R35 feels like it does all that footwork for you. And it kind of does because it's missing the "man-pedal" on the left. Not only that but it's $18k for a new trans in the event you toast one. For that much you can start looking at 5 ratio dogboxes and some sequential transmissions for the Vette. I am a sucker for AWD though.

The VR38DETT and the LSx engines are both a great base to modify as well.

They both have their place, IMHO
 
  #27  
Old 03-30-2011, 02:19 PM
z06dustin's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHX
Posts: 189
Originally Posted by DiamondStarMonsters

They both have their place, IMHO
Well put.

but I love the raw driving experience of the C5/C6 Vettes, they are sharp and direct with oversteer on demand and just the noise is intoxicating.
Sometimes though it's fun to be able to stab it in the corners, with an AWD and TCS, and not die.
 
  #28  
Old 03-30-2011, 04:10 PM
LittleMissE's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 61
I drive a Srt-4 every once in awhile but I like my fit for daily driving. Anything faster then I fit can get me in trouble. If I drove a faster car daily I would probably have a ticket by now.
 
  #29  
Old 03-30-2011, 07:57 PM
gsx-r35's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 56
Originally Posted by mahout
(Close to the GT-R but not no finicky, aka transmisiion limitations)
The Fit is indeed a fun car on track if you set it up right. See "Fit leading..." on you tube.
The only way to learn how to drive competitively is with an underpowered car, like a Sprite. Teaches you not to give anything away cause you never get it back. Unlike with a Z06. Brian Redmond said it best: its not how fast you but how not slow you go. drivers who look like they are just cruising are often the fastest.
The VR6 tranny on the R35 GT-R is hardly finicky. The issue was hyped to death by the media on account of a few isolated owners who repeatedly used the launch-control and ended up hosing their tranny as a result. Is it a perfect system? No but that's often the case with new technology. If it were truly finicky then there wouldn't be so many R35s successfully cranking 800-1000+hp through their transmissions. I respect the Corvette and actually wouldn't mind having one but I don't understand why so many Corvette owners seem to feel the need to point out something wrong with the GT-R whenever it's mentioned. I don't see too many GT-R owners calling out Corvette owners saying their car is an oversteery muscle car driven by old men, made from recycled milk bottles, and has the interior quality of a New York taxicab. In fact most GT-R owners I know like the Corvette for what it is and yet Corvette owners bang on all the time about how the GT-R is more expensive to maintain, the tranny is crap, it drives by itself, it needs a "proper manual", etc etc ad infinitum ad nauseum. At the end of the day the car scarcely matters and all the showboating of which car has what pales in comparison to the abilities of the meatbag behind the wheel. I just want to enjoy my car, whichever one floats my boat, and you can do the same.
I do agree with you about an underpowered car being a better one to learn with and that's one more reason I'm looking at the Fit. I have a modded superbike in my garage but take a fairly stock SV650 on the track with only about half the juice and a lot older tech. It's far more satisfying to pass the guy on the Ducati or MV Agusta on a cheap bike like that than on equal mounts.

Originally Posted by SteveInNC
I drive up the I-40 Old Fort Mountain grade in NC on a fairly regular basis. It has a four-mile continuous uphill section at about 8% grade, speed-limited to 55mph. I have a 2009 MT Fit and it pulls the hill OK with me, luggage, and a load of five-peoples' Xmas gifts. At worst, you might have to downshift a gear. If the speed limit was higher, probably not even then because the engine would be higher in the power. Most interstate design grades are maxed at 6%, but some like Old Fort were grand-fathered in.
Good to hear. As I said, I often have to drive in the mountains but there aren't any near enough where I live that I could get a dealer to let me take one up there to see how it gets on. Thank you for the input.

Originally Posted by z06dustin
Did not mean to turn it into one at all... I respect both cars a lot.

My only point was/is: Fit is an excellent DD. Comfortable. Uber cheap to operate. Can carry a ton of stuff. Relatively safe (side/curtain airbags etc). Just don't buy it an expect crazy performance. OP says:



Dude... it's an econobox. It can merge on the freeway, other than that stock it's not going to win any laurels stoplight to stoplight. So if you want something that is still exciting (acceleration wise, comparable to the other cars you referenced) a 114hp car is probably not up your ally. But go drive an auto and a manual (if you can find one, I have a manual, think it's fun to tick through the gears but that's just me) and see if it's quick enough to get you through the day or not.
I realize it's an econobox and I probably should have been clearer on what I meant. I was more concerned with power for more practical considerations than winning at the stoplights i.e. can it handle the mountains like I asked above, can it go highway speeds without too much effort, is it quick on its feet enough for cut-and-thrust lane changes in traffic etc. With a 500hp AWD supercar in the garage I've long since accepted that most other cars will just feel mundane in comparison but competently quick and snore-inducing are two different things in my book. And the only cars I mentioned are my SUV, which I didn't say was exciting, and my GT-R - which I never hinted at the Fit being comparable to

Mostly I wanted to know is, can it still be fun? Unfortunately I don't know anyone with a Fit and they aren't available for rent so with no opportunity for any lengthier exposure than a dealer test drive I appreciate the info you guys can give.

Once again, thanks for the responses everyone!
 
  #30  
Old 03-30-2011, 08:03 PM
gsx-r35's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 56
Originally Posted by j1nNju1c3
Whats up Doc! I work in a hospital too so I can relate in a way I guess...Haven't seen a doctor with a GT-R though...Lots of Range Rovers, Porsches and BMW's.

And since I drive from San Diego to LA quite frequently, I can say that the Fit has enough power to keep up with the other cars. My normal cruising speed is 80-up but this is tolerable because I have an auto which means I cruise at 3k RPM and loud music
Going from LA to SD though is a different story. Cars usually go 90+ and the Fit is GO. Trust me, you'll love cruising in it.
That's good to know. Gonna have to see about trying a manual on the highway and see if the fuss about it lacking a true overdrive sixth is really anything. Oh, and love your sig - that's funny!
 
  #31  
Old 03-30-2011, 08:06 PM
Perrenoud Fit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chesapeake, VA. -USA
Posts: 4,429
Thumbs up 1970 road runner and 1968 Charger

 

Last edited by Perrenoud Fit; 03-30-2011 at 08:11 PM.
  #32  
Old 03-30-2011, 08:06 PM
Lyon[Nightroad]'s Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Cackalacky
Posts: 1,827
I now own a 96 escort wagon as reliable DD it has 88 hp and gets 30 mpg city and 45 mpg highway with little effort. You want to talk bout slow, my escort defines it. In comparision my fit is my peppy weekend car, that currently needs to be torn apart to investigate coolant loss. Driving that escort makes my fit feel like a corner carving rocket so i can't imagine what the fit will make the gtr feel like. Anyway the fit has plenty of power.
 
  #33  
Old 03-30-2011, 08:35 PM
Chad T's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 454
Originally Posted by Perrenoud Fit

+reps to you for two of my favorite Mopars.

My Omni. Econobox.../fast weekend car.

 
  #34  
Old 03-30-2011, 08:51 PM
thaduke2003's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 233
That GLH is in amazing shape. You don't see many Omni's anymore, let alone a true GLH! Nice keep! Mark W.
 
  #35  
Old 03-30-2011, 09:01 PM
Perrenoud Fit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chesapeake, VA. -USA
Posts: 4,429
Cool That's a fast sleeper there too!

Originally Posted by Chad T
+reps to you for two of my favorite Mopars.

My Omni. Econobox.../fast weekend car.

Those Shelby turbo's ruled back in the 80's and 90's cuz everyone was V8 oriented and the turbo was "new technology" I had a 87 shelby Charger 5spd. and it was Ffffast it took the v8's back then!
Yours is in exceptional shape!
 

Last edited by Perrenoud Fit; 03-30-2011 at 09:04 PM.
  #36  
Old 03-31-2011, 06:29 AM
krazEkid's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: saratoga springs, utah
Posts: 36
my fast car that used to be my daily driver, and is now my weekend car is a 1999 honda accord coupe. i swapped out the motor and turbocharged it running at about 330hp . ask me why i did it? lol because everyone around where im from own STI's, EVO's or civic's. i like to be different!
 
  #37  
Old 03-31-2011, 02:39 PM
j1nNju1c3's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 1,497
Originally Posted by gsx-r35
That's good to know. Gonna have to see about trying a manual on the highway and see if the fuss about it lacking a true overdrive sixth is really anything. Oh, and love your sig - that's funny!
Thanks

The Fit Sport in auto isn't as bad either. I paddle shift everyday and it doesn't get old. I'm sure you can attest since you drive one. It shifts pretty quick and downshift isnt't as bad either. Plug in a throttle controller and it works wonders!
 
  #38  
Old 03-31-2011, 08:52 PM
cargun's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 51
Currently shopping for a '10 Grand Sport to add to the stable. Overall I've been very pleased with the Fit as a winter beater but would definitely recommend the manual trans. Other "DD" type vehicles are a 95 Impala and 06 Dodge Cummins.
 
  #39  
Old 04-01-2011, 12:50 PM
smaglik's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Flagstaff,AZ
Posts: 233
OP: The fit has ample power for the mountains when fully laden with gear. When I go home from phoenix, I start at 1000', go up to 5000', down to 3000', then up to 7000', and have no issue. The car will spin at 5500 rpm in 3rd gear up the long grades to keep you at 80, but there is no problem getting it or keeping it there.
 
  #40  
Old 04-01-2011, 08:02 PM
specboy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,462
We don't have it... YET but we are hoping for my Father-in-law's 1969 Shelby GT500. He's the original owner. ~Sigh

Our sporty car right now is the fit. I miss my GS-R and my wife misses her Civic Coupe but the fit was a necessary.



~SB
 

Last edited by specboy; 04-01-2011 at 08:04 PM.


Quick Reply: Any GE owner here also have a very fast weekend car and/or sportbike?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 AM.