Castrol CVT FLuid
Castrol CVT FLuid
I can get Castrol CVT fluid for a Fit for $24/gal vs $64/gal for the Honda's fluid. I find it hard to believe that there is really an difference.
Have any of you used non-Honda CVT fluid?
Have any of you used non-Honda CVT fluid?
Last edited by SilverEX15; Sep 2, 2025 at 01:34 PM.
"CVT fluid" doesn't have any enforced standards attached to it, so it can mean anything the manufacturer wants. I could slap a "CVT fluid" label on bottles of Dexron and sell it.
It's all about what the specific model of transmission needs to operate reliably. Honda says their fluid is the best. Castrol says theirs is just as good. As an owner, you could try sending in new and used samples of each fluid for lab analysis. Otherwise, it's just a question of brand-trust. How much do you trust each brand to do their engineering homework, and how does that correlate with cost?
Having tried Honda's MTF (which seemed to be 5w-something or thinner) in my '91 CRX, I can say that Honda doesn't always know best. Synchromesh (closer to 10w-ish) just shifts better.
It's all about what the specific model of transmission needs to operate reliably. Honda says their fluid is the best. Castrol says theirs is just as good. As an owner, you could try sending in new and used samples of each fluid for lab analysis. Otherwise, it's just a question of brand-trust. How much do you trust each brand to do their engineering homework, and how does that correlate with cost?
Having tried Honda's MTF (which seemed to be 5w-something or thinner) in my '91 CRX, I can say that Honda doesn't always know best. Synchromesh (closer to 10w-ish) just shifts better.
"CVT fluid" doesn't have any enforced standards attached to it, so it can mean anything the manufacturer wants. I could slap a "CVT fluid" label on bottles of Dexron and sell it.
It's all about what the specific model of transmission needs to operate reliably. Honda says their fluid is the best. Castrol says theirs is just as good. As an owner, you could try sending in new and used samples of each fluid for lab analysis. Otherwise, it's just a question of brand-trust. How much do you trust each brand to do their engineering homework, and how does that correlate with cost?
Having tried Honda's MTF (which seemed to be 5w-something or thinner) in my '91 CRX, I can say that Honda doesn't always know best. Synchromesh (closer to 10w-ish) just shifts better.
It's all about what the specific model of transmission needs to operate reliably. Honda says their fluid is the best. Castrol says theirs is just as good. As an owner, you could try sending in new and used samples of each fluid for lab analysis. Otherwise, it's just a question of brand-trust. How much do you trust each brand to do their engineering homework, and how does that correlate with cost?
Having tried Honda's MTF (which seemed to be 5w-something or thinner) in my '91 CRX, I can say that Honda doesn't always know best. Synchromesh (closer to 10w-ish) just shifts better.
Valvoline Synchromesh or Penzoil Synchromesh?
"CVT fluid" doesn't have any enforced standards attached to it, so it can mean anything the manufacturer wants. I could slap a "CVT fluid" label on bottles of Dexron and sell it.
It's all about what the specific model of transmission needs to operate reliably. Honda says their fluid is the best. Castrol says theirs is just as good. As an owner, you could try sending in new and used samples of each fluid for lab analysis. Otherwise, it's just a question of brand-trust. How much do you trust each brand to do their engineering homework, and how does that correlate with cost?
Having tried Honda's MTF (which seemed to be 5w-something or thinner) in my '91 CRX, I can say that Honda doesn't always know best. Synchromesh (closer to 10w-ish) just shifts better.
It's all about what the specific model of transmission needs to operate reliably. Honda says their fluid is the best. Castrol says theirs is just as good. As an owner, you could try sending in new and used samples of each fluid for lab analysis. Otherwise, it's just a question of brand-trust. How much do you trust each brand to do their engineering homework, and how does that correlate with cost?
Having tried Honda's MTF (which seemed to be 5w-something or thinner) in my '91 CRX, I can say that Honda doesn't always know best. Synchromesh (closer to 10w-ish) just shifts better.
I wouldn't use Syncromesh again in any of my cars. Its not good for softer metals either. It also doesn't hold up to cold weather well at all. I had to change my fluid within a year due to it failing and taking out my 3rd gear syncro in my VR4. Use the proper fluid and enjoy a happy transmission that will have predicable results.
Does your VR4 call for motor oil as MTF?
The L-series (Fit engines) manual transmissions are a direct evolution of the D-series transmissions they replaced, so I feel pretty confident making that recommendation. Honda literally just mirrored the 7th gen Civic transmission left to right (D-series engines are on the left of the engine bay, L-series are on the right) and made the typical gear ratio and generational tweaks. Honda MTF came into existence due to motor oil (which was previously the specified fluid) formulations had changed. Modern motor oil has a bunch of friction-reducing additives that make it too slippery for the synchros and drag rings to work as intended. In response, Honda started selling their original MTF formulation, which is essentially 1980s motor oil. They went with a thinner weight to improve fuel efficiency, and added a touch of gear oil additives judging from the smell.
Other auto manufacturers ran into the same problem, so they produced their own old-school-motor-oil formulations. Synchromesh is the GM-spec '80s-motor-oil fluid.
The L-series (Fit engines) manual transmissions are a direct evolution of the D-series transmissions they replaced, so I feel pretty confident making that recommendation. Honda literally just mirrored the 7th gen Civic transmission left to right (D-series engines are on the left of the engine bay, L-series are on the right) and made the typical gear ratio and generational tweaks. Honda MTF came into existence due to motor oil (which was previously the specified fluid) formulations had changed. Modern motor oil has a bunch of friction-reducing additives that make it too slippery for the synchros and drag rings to work as intended. In response, Honda started selling their original MTF formulation, which is essentially 1980s motor oil. They went with a thinner weight to improve fuel efficiency, and added a touch of gear oil additives judging from the smell.
Other auto manufacturers ran into the same problem, so they produced their own old-school-motor-oil formulations. Synchromesh is the GM-spec '80s-motor-oil fluid.
Does your VR4 call for motor oil as MTF?
The L-series (Fit engines) manual transmissions are a direct evolution of the D-series transmissions they replaced, so I feel pretty confident making that recommendation. Honda literally just mirrored the 7th gen Civic transmission left to right (D-series engines are on the left of the engine bay, L-series are on the right) and made the typical gear ratio and generational tweaks. Honda MTF came into existence due to motor oil (which was previously the specified fluid) formulations had changed. Modern motor oil has a bunch of friction-reducing additives that make it too slippery for the synchros and drag rings to work as intended. In response, Honda started selling their original MTF formulation, which is essentially 1980s motor oil. They went with a thinner weight to improve fuel efficiency, and added a touch of gear oil additives judging from the smell.
Other auto manufacturers ran into the same problem, so they produced their own old-school-motor-oil formulations. Synchromesh is the GM-spec '80s-motor-oil fluid.
The L-series (Fit engines) manual transmissions are a direct evolution of the D-series transmissions they replaced, so I feel pretty confident making that recommendation. Honda literally just mirrored the 7th gen Civic transmission left to right (D-series engines are on the left of the engine bay, L-series are on the right) and made the typical gear ratio and generational tweaks. Honda MTF came into existence due to motor oil (which was previously the specified fluid) formulations had changed. Modern motor oil has a bunch of friction-reducing additives that make it too slippery for the synchros and drag rings to work as intended. In response, Honda started selling their original MTF formulation, which is essentially 1980s motor oil. They went with a thinner weight to improve fuel efficiency, and added a touch of gear oil additives judging from the smell.
Other auto manufacturers ran into the same problem, so they produced their own old-school-motor-oil formulations. Synchromesh is the GM-spec '80s-motor-oil fluid.
Those are all heavy gear oils. MT85 is 75w85 on the same measurement system as the 10w30 SF/SG that Honda recommended through the mid '90s.
Again weight is only one aspect of oils composition.
Amsoil
I have done 2 CVT flushes and both times have used Amsoil CVT which in ny opinion is better than Honda fluid! I get no clunk of any kind when shifting from druve to reverse, etc. I will only use Amsoil because it is rated for extreme temps and we need all the help we can get here in the Tucson, AZ summer months especially! I don't believe that Honda fluid could handle the extreme heat. What do the Japanese know about extreme ambiant heat?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



