3rd Generation (2015+) Say hello to the newest member of the Fit family. 3rd Generation specific talk and questions here.

DI carbon build up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2016 | 12:09 PM
  #1  
Redd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 236
From: NC
DI carbon build up

Has anyone had any carbon build up issues on the intake valves yet???
 
Old Jul 3, 2016 | 06:30 PM
  #2  
Uncle Gary's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,421
From: Upstate New York
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Redd
Has anyone had any carbon build up issues on the intake valves yet???
No, am I supposed to? I think there was one person who reported it a while back, but forget who.
 
Old Jul 4, 2016 | 08:55 AM
  #3  
Carbuff2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,704
From: Second house on the left
5 Year Member
This question as it pertains to Direct Injection engines has been bugging me recently. (I OBVIOUSLY have too much time on my hands, LOL)

In many manufacturer's engines, carbon buildup on valves has been an issue. (I'm talking about Audis and Hyundais...)

Often, the manufacturers recommend Top-Tier (extra detergent) gasoline for their DI engines. But I cannot understand how this would make a significant difference, as the fuel is squirted into the combustion chambers directly, AFTER the intake valves.

++++++++++++++++++++

Decades ago, I would squirt water into the intake of some of my cars to remove carbon deposits (and eliminate pinging). If I owned a DI equipped car, would this practice be beneficial?
 
Old Jul 4, 2016 | 10:48 AM
  #4  
Redd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 236
From: NC
Originally Posted by Carbuff2
This question as it pertains to Direct Injection engines has been bugging me recently. (I OBVIOUSLY have too much time on my hands, LOL)

In many manufacturer's engines, carbon buildup on valves has been an issue. (I'm talking about Audis and Hyundais...)

Often, the manufacturers recommend Top-Tier (extra detergent) gasoline for their DI engines. But I cannot understand how this would make a significant difference, as the fuel is squirted into the combustion chambers directly, AFTER the intake valves.

++++++++++++++++++++

Decades ago, I would squirt water into the intake of some of my cars to remove carbon deposits (and eliminate pinging). If I owned a DI equipped car, would this practice be beneficial?
I wonder if not enough miles have been put on these engines yet to see the problem. From what I'm hearing it's inevitable at some point and top tier gas only delays it.

I know Mazda says they put an oil/air separator in their EGR system to supposedly eliminate the problem.
 
Old Jul 4, 2016 | 11:20 AM
  #5  
jhn's Avatar
jhn
Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 605
From: CD
Or... Maybe it's not a serious problem?

There's plenty of people who have a lot of miles on their GK's. I suspect most of the valve coking issues are related to the fuel source moreso than a design issue.

I know there's people who have posted up high mileage on their cars; have weighed in their experiences, or are you just focused on the few who have commented on their isolated valve problems?
 
Old Jul 4, 2016 | 12:47 PM
  #6  
Pitcha's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 29
From: Wisconsin
As I understand it, the crankcase vents into the intake air box where oil mist from the crankcase then collects. That's been standard procedure on cars for a long time (aka PCV, or positive crankcase ventilation). If you have a drain hose or other system to get rid of that collected oil, the air drawn into the engine for combustion won't have any oil mist in it.

But if the oil that's collected in the air box is just sucked back into the engine during combustion, you will have an oil film collect on the back of the intake valves. With a conventional engine the incoming air/fuel mix will "rinse" that oil off the intake valves, but in a direct injection engine the fuel is injected after the intake valves so there's nothing to "rinse" the accumulated oil mist off the intake valves.

Thus the oil eventually becomes baked into the back of the intakes valves and that's how you end up with carbon deposits. Because no fuel hits the back of the intake valves in a DI engine, nothing in the fuel (additives, cleaners, etc.) can help clean the back of the intake valves.

The solution some people favor is to install a mod in the intake air box so that the oil is collected in a drain container and thus is not drawn into the engine during combustion. This obviously requires that the drain container be periodically emptied of the collected oil.
 

Last edited by Pitcha; Jul 4, 2016 at 12:52 PM.
Old Jul 4, 2016 | 02:06 PM
  #7  
Redd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 236
From: NC
Originally Posted by jhn
Or... Maybe it's not a serious problem?

There's plenty of people who have a lot of miles on their GK's. I suspect most of the valve coking issues are related to the fuel source moreso than a design issue.

I know there's people who have posted up high mileage on their cars; have weighed in their experiences, or are you just focused on the few who have commented on their isolated valve problems?
If there are lots of people with 50-75k miles without an issue that's good news, I just haven't heard from very many.
 
Old Jul 4, 2016 | 02:34 PM
  #8  
LarryS's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 61
From: PacNW
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Redd
If there are lots of people with 50-75k miles without an issue that's good news, I just haven't heard from very many.
Wouldn't an issue like that be covered under the 80,000 mile emmissions warranty?
 
Old Jul 5, 2016 | 09:19 AM
  #9  
cookiemech's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 78
From: West Newton, PA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by LarryS
Wouldn't an issue like that be covered under the 80,000 mile emmissions warranty?
Only if it throws an emissions code. If it just runs crappy or gas mileage goes down, too bad . . .

And I'd sort of like the car to last beyond 80K miles. Or I would have bought something from GM or Fiat Chrysler.
 
Old Jul 5, 2016 | 10:48 AM
  #10  
Redd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 236
From: NC
Originally Posted by cookiemech
Only if it throws an emissions code. If it just runs crappy or gas mileage goes down, too bad . . .

And I'd sort of like the car to last beyond 80K miles. Or I would have bought something from GM or Fiat Chrysler.
I don't think it's an engine killer, it would just be costly to take the intake off and blast the carbon off with walnut shells which is what most people are doing.
 
Old Jul 5, 2016 | 12:16 PM
  #11  
dwtaylorpdx's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,465
From: Portland Or
5 Year Member
The other issue that you have is that since the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, there is no fuel at idle washing the oil from the valve guides off the valve.
 
Old Jul 5, 2016 | 04:26 PM
  #12  
cookiemech's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 78
From: West Newton, PA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Redd
I don't think it's an engine killer, it would just be costly to take the intake off and blast the carbon off with walnut shells which is what most people are doing.
No, not an engine killer. But the potential cost and annoyance of doing that is absurd, considering that I have never done that with any vehicle at much higher mileages.

I'll wait and see. My wife usually gives her cars away to relatives when they are several years old, with much less than 80K miles. So probably not an issue for me.
 
Old Jul 5, 2016 | 11:35 PM
  #13  
n9cv's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,095
From: Hebron, In
5 Year Member
People on the Colorado forum are having problems with intake valve carbon / coking on the 3.5 DI engine at much lower mileages than you are asking about. Many of them are installing an oil separator which they call a "catch can". Ethanol diluted "top tier" fuel will not help in this situation because the fuel is injected into the system past the intake valves.
 
Old Jul 6, 2016 | 05:43 PM
  #14  
dwtaylorpdx's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,465
From: Portland Or
5 Year Member
Valve "Coking" (SP?) is a long time issue with non turbo diesel engines as well.
I know we used to pop tractor heads off each season and clean them. But thats been
like 30 years ago..
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ewong12
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
4
May 30, 2011 08:11 PM
ThirdGear
FIT-Vendor Sponsored Group Buys and Sales
0
Oct 18, 2010 06:37 PM
gynosis
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
0
Jul 19, 2008 06:48 PM
tunerzimage
TunerzImage
12
Mar 19, 2008 07:05 PM
goodyonsen
Fit Photos & Videos
34
Mar 11, 2008 05:35 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.