3rd Generation (2015+) Say hello to the newest member of the Fit family. 3rd Generation specific talk and questions here.

What were your second/other choices, after the Fit?

  #21  
Old 07-12-2017, 05:05 PM
bargainguy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: milwaukee, wi
Posts: 974
Originally Posted by kenchan
so long story short wat did u end up with?
You mean me? '16 Fit LX. Sorry if I didn't make that clear.
 
  #22  
Old 07-12-2017, 06:51 PM
max503's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: godfrey, il
Posts: 223
I absolutely love the looks of the two-door Focus hatchbacks. However, our fleet cars at work are Focuses and they have horrendous transmissions. Cruising at low speed will make you seasick.
I strongly considered a Nissan Versa Note but the one I drove was noticeably louder than the Fit on the highway.
 
  #23  
Old 07-12-2017, 07:16 PM
woof's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Manitoba CANADA
Posts: 1,259
The Versa Note only has a 109 HP engine vs the Fit's 130 HP. Since they look to be similarly sized vehicles I would thing the power difference would be very noticeable.
 
  #24  
Old 07-12-2017, 09:02 PM
FitFreakD's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: united states
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by FitFreakD
Originally Posted by fitchet
In passing? The Nissan Versa...the somewhat less sporty looking Honda Fit lost ugly sister... In the end? I just couldn't do it.
I am surprised when i see them in my peripheral vision, and they seem like Fits! But yeah, no thanks...
Whoops I was thinking of the previous gen Versa hatch, which was *ugh*. The current Versa Note does look so similar to the GK. I thought that both Versa hbs were still being sold. Anyhow, the Note was not on my list at all.
 
  #25  
Old 07-12-2017, 09:14 PM
TorontoBoy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 938
Originally Posted by woof
The Versa Note only has a 109 HP engine vs the Fit's 130 HP. Since they look to be similarly sized vehicles I would thing the power difference would be very noticeable.
Not only is the power difference very noticeable, the Versa Note's handling is very boat-like. I checked out their owner forum and it was abysmal. The Versa Note was too much toaster than enthusiast for me.

On the plus side the Versa Note's hatch section can be configured to have a false bottom with a flat hatch floor. Cargo space is only second to the Fit.

Here in Canada we have the Nissan Micra, 5MT for $9,995CAD. It has the same engine and trans as the Versa Note, but much lighter and eschew of amenities: a stripper's stripper car. Still, their 5MT was a blast to drive, and very gocart-ish.
 

Last edited by TorontoBoy; 07-12-2017 at 09:17 PM.
  #26  
Old 07-12-2017, 09:42 PM
FitFreakD's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: united states
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by max503
I absolutely love the looks of the two-door Focus hatchbacks.
Did the 2 door/3 door ones ever sell in N. America (I thought they didn't)?

I thought the 3d's weren't bad - I love well-rated, well-proportioned 3d hatches, and the US doesn't have enough of them imho (no more new 3d Golfs! Though they seem a bit big to be 3d now). But wow, the new Fiestas coming up look sweeeet! https://www.netcarshow.com/ford/2017-fiesta/

I kind of ignored Ford until the past several years, with their improved looks. I wish they had their Tourneo/Transit Courier (a Fiesta-based mini minivan sold overseas) here, too.
 
  #27  
Old 07-12-2017, 10:25 PM
FitFreakD's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: united states
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by BenQuick
...The problem with the Fiesta is its lingering auto trans problems. If they ever correct it, and if I found myself looking for another car, I'd seriously consider the Fiesta.
I might too, especially with the 7th gen exterior design.

Originally Posted by max503
I absolutely love the looks of the two-door Focus hatchbacks. However, our fleet cars at work are Focuses and they have horrendous transmissions. Cruising at low speed will make you seasick.
Both great tips.
 

Last edited by FitFreakD; 07-13-2017 at 01:35 AM.
  #28  
Old 07-12-2017, 11:40 PM
FitFreakD's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: united states
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by ej8tofit
...golf was most fun to drive, and i like the interior and exterior styling best...

although i read about some reliability issues with the fit, overall i still felt the fit would have the best reliability and combined with my general bias toward honda, pretty easily pushed me to the fit.
Originally Posted by TorontoBoy
More money: Mazda3 (smaller interior), VW Golf hatchback (much more expensive)
Same money: Nissan Versa Note (not as good handling)

We rented small cars for a year prior to purchase, so went through a lot of different cars. I found the Fit the best value for money for our family, and have not been disappointed. Nothing is perfect
Exterior (mostly) styling - the feature I'm still hung up on most. Love roominess + sizable windows + sharp looks. The last wagon/compact roomy car that gave me similar vibes is the Volvo V40 ('96-'04).

to the other insights above.
 
  #29  
Old 07-13-2017, 01:30 AM
radioarno's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: toronto
Posts: 243
hyundai touring, elantra touring, mazda3, golf. thrilled to pieces with the Fit.
 
  #30  
Old 07-13-2017, 02:08 PM
sjd's Avatar
sjd
sjd is offline
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 187
I'm not looking at anything else in the Fit's class as it's clearly the standout in the class. The last Versa I rented was a slow crapcan that truly scared me on the highway with it's lack of acceleration.

Part of me is considering another truck as I used to own a 2013 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off Road model that I sold for my 2015 Civic Si and really miss having it. However, I just don't think I can justify more than double the purchase price not to mention the increased fuel and maintenance costs.
 
  #31  
Old 07-13-2017, 09:40 PM
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OG Club
Posts: 20,289
Originally Posted by bargainguy
You mean me? '16 Fit LX. Sorry if I didn't make that clear.
cool! no need to apologize.
 
  #32  
Old 07-15-2017, 12:11 AM
ephodges's Avatar
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 7
We had a 2015 Civic and looked for something in the line of a small SUV. We considered the Ford Escape, but I've not been very impressed with the quality of Ford. The Honda HR-V was a strong choice, but Magic Seats and the style of the 2017 Fit LX won out
 
  #33  
Old 07-15-2017, 08:12 AM
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OG Club
Posts: 20,289
was the 15 the earlier gen or the current gen civic? i have to say, that one gen prior was one of the worst cars ive driven in a long time. i couldnt even believe it was a honda or a "Civic".

the dealer gave me one as a loaner when i had the GK in the shop for warranty repair for a few days. i hated it so much i felt like walking vs driving it back to the dealer to return it.
 
  #34  
Old 07-15-2017, 08:48 AM
bargainguy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: milwaukee, wi
Posts: 974
Originally Posted by ephodges
...The Honda HR-V was a strong choice, but Magic Seats and the style of the 2017 Fit LX won out...
The HR-V has the Magic Seats too. Maybe your dealer didn't point this out?
 
  #35  
Old 07-15-2017, 11:33 AM
woof's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Manitoba CANADA
Posts: 1,259
Trouble with the HRV is that it has a poor engine only rated at 141 HP vs the Fit's 130 HP. That wouldn't matter if it didn't weigh 500 lb more than the Fit (it's kinda like having to carry around 2 really fat relatives in your vehicle all the time). The HRV though seems to be selling well at the moment but I'm guessing that doing something about that HRV engine is high on Honda's list. The justification for a turbo there is strong.
 
  #36  
Old 07-15-2017, 06:24 PM
BenQuick's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by woof
That wouldn't matter if it didn't weigh 500 lb more than the Fit (it's kinda like having to carry around 2 really fat relatives in your vehicle all the time).


I know just the 2 you're talking about...
 
  #37  
Old 07-15-2017, 06:25 PM
The Fitness's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 425
Originally Posted by BenQuick


I know just the 2 you're talking about...
"I can't get behind that!"


 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fit4NJ
Fit Freak Newbie / FAQs
9
03-12-2017 05:47 PM
Odie
3rd Generation (2015+)
15
02-29-2016 09:26 AM
Italianese87
3rd Generation (2015+)
39
09-03-2014 12:26 PM
nigelc
3rd Generation (2015+)
11
06-26-2014 08:12 AM
Lagarta
General Fit Talk
19
07-14-2009 04:43 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: What were your second/other choices, after the Fit?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 PM.