Honda Fit vs. Fiat Panda
Thread Starter
|
New Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Honda Fit vs. Fiat Panda
So they're not exactly the world's most comparable autos, but there are some undeniable similarities. Which are some pro's and con's to each car - like what can the Fit offer that the Panda doesn't and vice versa? Which would you say has a longer shelf life in terms of reliability?
Panda
vs.
Fit
Panda
vs.
Fit
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 101
From: Portland, OR USA
No. The Fiat Panda, which will probably come to the U.S. as as Chrysler, is made in Poland. I doubt the U.S. variants will be made in Poland, though; probably in the U.S. or Mexico.
However, the Chinese company "Great Wall" did knock off the Panda with a car called the "Peri."
They're saying the Panda might come to the U.S. in its 4x4 version, which could possibly be under the Jeep nameplate. I'd rock one.
To the OP, the Panda is available in 4x4 (as mentioned). Maximum power is 99 hp, so it'd be less powerful than a Fit. It's also smaller than a fit. I believe the Panda is considered an A-class vehicle, whereas the fit is a B-class.
As you know, it's hard to beat a Honda for reliability. I don't know much about Fiat's reliability, though. I'd bet it's not as good as Honda's, though ...
However, the Chinese company "Great Wall" did knock off the Panda with a car called the "Peri."
They're saying the Panda might come to the U.S. in its 4x4 version, which could possibly be under the Jeep nameplate. I'd rock one.
To the OP, the Panda is available in 4x4 (as mentioned). Maximum power is 99 hp, so it'd be less powerful than a Fit. It's also smaller than a fit. I believe the Panda is considered an A-class vehicle, whereas the fit is a B-class.
As you know, it's hard to beat a Honda for reliability. I don't know much about Fiat's reliability, though. I'd bet it's not as good as Honda's, though ...
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 93
From: Pennsylvania
Nuff said.
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 101
From: Portland, OR USA
However, I haven't followed the reliability ratings in Europe.
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,371
From: NC USA
So they're not exactly the world's most comparable autos, but there are some undeniable similarities. Which are some pro's and con's to each car - like what can the Fit offer that the Panda doesn't and vice versa? Which would you say has a longer shelf life in terms of reliability?
As a past owner of a Fiat and wrenching several I can vouch for Honda having considerable reliability edge on Fiats. One of the funniest jokes around is the thought of Chrysler selling Fiats specified by bureaucrats. LOL squared.
Fiats usually drove well between repairs or tuneups but my Hondas have been far superior and drove just as well if not better. And yes I've had an Abarth too; sceamer for a month at a time. The latest Automotive news ran the consumer quality data for the Fiat in selected Europen countries and Fiat was in the lowest quartille. Things haven't changed much it seems.
PS fan of the Steig, eh.
Last edited by mahout; Jun 3, 2009 at 08:55 AM.
Fiat is at the bottom of the reliability ratings in europe
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,888
From: Parañaque City, Philippines
That Panda 100HP sure has found a lot of fans. I've read a lot of road tests praising the chassis and engine balance of the little Fiat.
It looks a little too squarish for me though. But that's where its cousin the Fiat 500 Abarth comes in.
Mmmm, tasty...
It looks a little too squarish for me though. But that's where its cousin the Fiat 500 Abarth comes in.
Mmmm, tasty...
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 561
From: Illinois
I loved those Fiats 40 years ago. You really had to keep the revs up to get any power at all. They looked pretty for one mid-Western winter--real sexy and Italian, although very tiny. Then they all had the same color: rust. Didn't matter, though, because they wouldn't run after that winter anyway. You could learn a lot about cars from owning a Fiat.
Of course they're much better now.
Cheers.
Of course they're much better now.
Cheers.
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,371
From: NC USA
Fret not, next year you can buy one from Chrysler. LOL squared.
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,371
From: NC USA
I loved those Fiats 40 years ago. You really had to keep the revs up to get any power at all. They looked pretty for one mid-Western winter--real sexy and Italian, although very tiny. Then they all had the same color: rust. Didn't matter, though, because they wouldn't run after that winter anyway. You could learn a lot about cars from owning a Fiat.
Of course they're much better now.
Cheers.
Of course they're much better now.
Cheers.
Not much better.. Refer to latest quality ratings from Europe. Which is why the Panda will NOT be Chrysler badged. It will be Fiast badged.
Last edited by mahout; Jun 5, 2009 at 04:43 PM.
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 73
From: Ruston, WA
They may not be the most reliable but hey they are pretty new.
2009 Fiat 500 Abarth - First Drive Review/Not Sold in the U.S./High Performance/Hot Lists/Reviews/Car and Driver - Car And Driver
2009 Fiat 500 Abarth - First Drive Review/Not Sold in the U.S./High Performance/Hot Lists/Reviews/Car and Driver - Car And Driver
I'm guessing when the Panda does get here; it'll be equipped with more horsepower, not much more, but enough to move us fat Americans around town. j/k But, I'm not excited for the cars sporting Fiat badges... but as for Alfa Romeo, I'll gladly push one of those home after it breaks down.
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,371
From: NC USA
I'm guessing when the Panda does get here; it'll be equipped with more horsepower, not much more, but enough to move us fat Americans around town. j/k But, I'm not excited for the cars sporting Fiat badges... but as for Alfa Romeo, I'll gladly push one of those home after it breaks down.
Look for less power to meet US emissions standards and greater weight to meet DOT/NHTSA requirements.
Thats why it will be branded FIAT, not Chrysler. The industry expect sales dependent on Obama rebates.
