Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning Reference Library for Engine Modifications, Swaps and Tuning

KraftWerks Supercharger Kit Info v3.0

Old Jun 13, 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #181  
lanakano's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 76
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
I've had the JDM front end on since last year. So for all of you who have the JDM front end and put on the KWSC you will notice that the hood wont close. It doesn't close because the KWSC discharge pipe that runs above the intake manifold from the pulley side of the engine to the flywheel side has to large of a diameter (pipe with the KW logo on it). What I did to fix the problem is used an aluminum 1.75" diameter mandrel bent pipe to replace a section of the above pipe. Now everything works perfect. When I first put the KWSC on I was so pissed that the hood didn't close. I changed my oem hood to my cf hood and smashed it closed (in hope that the cf hood would bend). This really did bend the ___ out to the cf hood. The good thing is that it left marks on the discharge pipe so I knew exactly what the problem was.

I used a 1.75" pipe because the SC outlet is around 1.75" and the discharge pipes that lead from the SC to the mentioned above KW logo pipe is also 1.75" od. The KW logo pipe is around 2.5" od because the throttle body is around 2.5" od. By adding a couple of hose clamps, silicone hose for 1.75 od pipe, and the above 1.75 replacement pipe you'll be golden with the JDM front end.

Hope this helps.

Chris this hasn't been said by any one before but I wanted to say thank you for putting your car up as a mule. The KWSC is really the BEST FI kit on the market. I know that the introduction of this kit really depended upon your car. Thank you for giving up your car so that we all could benefit.
 

Last edited by lanakano; Jun 13, 2008 at 03:07 PM.
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #182  
xorbe's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Bay Area, CA USA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by KraftWerks
You will never get a dyno to start at zero. That would mean the engine was not running.

Typical dyno centers start their runs at 15-20mph. It is how the tool is used.

-OJR

lololol nonono, not the data, just the whp axis label!
 
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 03:21 PM
  #183  
JDMchris.com's Avatar
I run THIS
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,411
From: Riverside
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by lanakano
I've had the JDM front end on since last year. So for all of you who have the JDM front end and put on the KWSC you will notice that the hood wont close. It doesn't close because the KWSC discharge pipe that runs above the intake manifold from the pulley side of the engine to the flywheel side has to large of a diameter (pipe with the KW logo on it). What I did to fix the problem is used an aluminum 1.75" diameter mandrel bent pipe to replace a section of the above pipe. Now everything works perfect. When I first put the KWSC on I was so pissed that the hood didn't close. I changed my oem hood to my cf hood and smashed it closed (in hope that the cf hood would bend). This really did bend the ___ out to the cf hood. The good thing is that it left marks on the discharge pipe so I knew exactly what the problem was.

I used a 1.75" pipe because the SC outlet is around 1.75" and the discharge pipes that lead from the SC to the mentioned above KW logo pipe is also 1.75" od. The KW logo pipe is around 2.5" od because the throttle body is around 2.5" od. By adding a couple of hose clamps, silicone hose for 1.75 od pipe, and the above 1.75 replacement pipe you'll be golden with the JDM front end.

Hope this helps.

Chris this hasn't been said by any one before but I wanted to say thank you for putting your car up as a mule. The KWSC is really the BEST FI kit on the market. I know that the introduction of this kit really depended upon your car. Thank you for giving up your car so that we all could benefit.
GOod deal Lance... I simply gutted my OEM hood to clear!
 
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #184  
Sugarphreak's Avatar
Push My Button
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,997
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by xorbe
I also notice that the AFR at the bottom of the chart is rising rapidly. I wonder what i/h/e + 195cc would do.
That AF is ok. Better to go with engine management for anything more than that IMO, the larger injectors are not needed.
 

Last edited by Sugarphreak; Jun 13, 2008 at 05:12 PM.
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #185  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
thanks for the dynos! glad to see that the supercharger is still putting out signficantly more hp tq even over this. (compared it to the base map that's on kraftwerks site.)
 
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #186  
lanakano's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 76
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
It's really my pleasure to provide that type of information. I dynoed my car with J's header, J's test pipe, J's b pipe, J's muffler, and Last Station's power box. My header and test pipe are coated with Swian Techs "White Lightning." My dyno charts are very similar to Ben's dynos I posted (actually a couple higher). But because of the variance between dynos, humidity, blah, blah, blah. I just say they are similar to Ben's.

Before I purchased the KWSC I compared my charts to Kraftwerks. As eldaino mentioned, these charts really show the benefits of the the KWSC.

For those of you who have purchased full exhaust like me your one step closer to maxing out the sc when the options become available.
 

Last edited by lanakano; Jun 13, 2008 at 05:35 PM.
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #187  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by lanakano
It's really my pleasure to provide that type of information. I dynoed my car with J's header, J's test pipe, J's b pipe, J's muffler, and Last Station's power box. My header and test pipe are coated with Swian Techs "White Lightning." My dyno charts are very similar to Ben's dynos I posted (actually a couple higher). But because of the variance between dynos, humidity, blah, blah, blah. I just say they are similar to Ben's.

Before I purchased the KWSC I compared my charts to Kraftwerks. As eldaino mentioned, these charts really show the benefits of the the KWSC.

For those of you who have purchased full exhaust like me your one step closer to maxing out the sc when the options become available.
so are you currently running this exhaust and header set-up with your kit? have you done any dyno runs with everything already on?
 
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 05:52 PM
  #188  
lanakano's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 76
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
No I'm not running the Header or test pipe. Even though I'm waiting anxiously for Tom's dynos (Mugen header, ? cat delete) I will most likely wait untill the Hondata comes out before re-installing them.

Sorry no dynos yet. I've only been up and running for two weeks and don't work as fast as Tom. In addition, I trust what KW dynos read. I will be interested in dynos in the future though.
 
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #189  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by lanakano
No I'm not running the Header or test pipe. Even though I'm waiting anxiously for Tom's dynos (Mugen header, ? cat delete) I will most likely wait untill the Hondata comes out before re-installing them.

Sorry no dynos yet. I've only been up and running for two weeks and don't work as fast as Tom. In addition, I trust what KW dynos read. I will be interested in dynos in the future though.

look forward to seeing them man, if all goes well, you should be feeling a significant improvement once you get it all on!
 
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 07:19 PM
  #190  
DynamicFit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 423
From: Aliso Viejo, CA
Originally Posted by lanakano
No I'm not running the Header or test pipe. Even though I'm waiting anxiously for Tom's dynos (Mugen header, ? cat delete) I will most likely wait untill the Hondata comes out before re-installing them.

Sorry no dynos yet. I've only been up and running for two weeks and don't work as fast as Tom. In addition, I trust what KW dynos read. I will be interested in dynos in the future though.
Sorry about the delay on my updated dyno. Was helping Umiekun with swapping springs. Will defnitiely have updated dynos w/ A/F ratio by tomorrow.

Tom
 
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 07:12 PM
  #191  
espo79's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 153
From: Florida
Did i just screw up?

im thinking about going FI with the kraftwerks supercharger maybe around christmas ...Did i just screw myself by buying the 50mm skunk2 catback instead of the 60mm??????
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 06:22 AM
  #192  
SickFit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 965
From: Florida
Originally Posted by espo79
im thinking about going FI with the kraftwerks supercharger maybe around christmas ...Did i just screw myself by buying the 50mm skunk2 catback instead of the 60mm??????
No you didnt.
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 01:34 PM
  #193  
bschook5's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 116
From: Royse City, TX
Can someone who has just the base kit w/out injector upgrade installed on a M/T Fit do a quick test and see what kinda 0-60 times you are getting?

Just trying to compare what im getting with my fit w/the base S/C kit installed.

Thanks.
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #194  
xorbe's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Bay Area, CA USA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by bschook5
Can someone who has just the base kit w/out injector upgrade installed on a M/T Fit do a quick test and see what kinda 0-60 times you are getting?
There are so many variables... what temperature and humidity, what altitude, and how good is the driver, and with 1 foot of roll-out? I figured out this weekend that 63F (night) -> 99F (sunny afternoon) makes ~1.1s difference for my stock a/t! I was sort of disheartened that I may have a hard time quantifying my own mods to a reasonable degree.
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 03:43 PM
  #195  
espo79's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 153
From: Florida
Originally Posted by SickFit
No you didnt.

thanks....Am i looking at loosing overall gains due t0 smaller mm piping?, or is it a small small difference?
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 03:49 PM
  #196  
JDMchris.com's Avatar
I run THIS
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,411
From: Riverside
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by espo79
thanks....Am i looking at loosing overall gains due t0 smaller mm piping?, or is it a small small difference?
no, you probably wouldnt see a difference anyway.
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 05:47 PM
  #197  
YeeFit's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,110
From: Calgary, Canada
Hey Chris, any idea what kind of numbers you were putting down with the 8psi and hondata? 160whp? torque?

I know you said it felt like it was faster than your stock s2000.. atleast I think u mentioned that.
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #198  
espo79's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 153
From: Florida
Originally Posted by JDMchris.com
no, you probably wouldnt see a difference anyway.
thanks chris.....i was concerned about that.....thanks for clearing that up
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 06:10 PM
  #199  
JDMchris.com's Avatar
I run THIS
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,411
From: Riverside
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by YeeFit
Hey Chris, any idea what kind of numbers you were putting down with the 8psi and hondata? 160whp? torque?

I know you said it felt like it was faster than your stock s2000.. atleast I think u mentioned that.
More info will be released from KW in the future.. and it doesnt feel like its faster... IT IS FASTER.
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #200  
REXXXXXXXXX's Avatar
Frequent FitFreak Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 805
From: N Jersey
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.