Anyone try a 205/50R16 on the 16" Fit Sport wheel?
#21
That's what I was thinking...
I have the 205/50R16 ExtremeContact DWS on the OEM stock rim for my 2010 SSM sport. The handling and feel of the new tires are like no comparison to stock... The new tires feel great in the dry, with better grip due to the better rating. Stopping distances are shorter. Turning at a traffic light yields less understeer than stock. A lot more precise than the stock. A little bit of the Fit's agility is lost, but much more stable road manners. Bumps are less painful. Steering effort is a little higher due to the higher contact patch, but I like the better feedback from the wheel... The tires are definitely worth the money... Won't need to get another set of wheels for a while longer.
#24
Don't expect to be saving much
I had a 2007 Civic Hybrid, and the Fit is similarly underpowered and highly precise, meaning weight is a far larger factor than rolling resistance. When I changed tires on my Civic, I changed to a Yokohama Avid TRZ in the same size, which had much better mileage rating/rolling resistance, but the total tire/wheel weight was 4lbs heavier than stock. I LOST a solid 4mpg by making that change, and 95% of my driving is on the interstate, where start-up torque is a non factor since the car is already running at speed (no rotational inertia issue for the wheels at 70mph).
Just my 2 cents...
#25
Running Pirelli P6 205/50/16 on stock 2009 Fit Sport Rims.
After they wore in (about 1.5 tanks of gas) cornering performance is distinctly better, have to really push it to get the tires to squeal, and unlike the Dunlops from dealer they don't really break loose easily - they squeal and then grip again.
Far more solid road manners, less bumpy, and tire noise is reduced a little. Did notice "squirrelly" steering initially with decent lateral wind (~15-30 MPH) over break-in period.
Total cost, 660 and some change.
After they wore in (about 1.5 tanks of gas) cornering performance is distinctly better, have to really push it to get the tires to squeal, and unlike the Dunlops from dealer they don't really break loose easily - they squeal and then grip again.
Far more solid road manners, less bumpy, and tire noise is reduced a little. Did notice "squirrelly" steering initially with decent lateral wind (~15-30 MPH) over break-in period.
Total cost, 660 and some change.
#27
Adding rubber weight = bad
Tire size calculator
#28
Running Pirelli P6 205/50/16 on stock 2009 Fit Sport Rims.
After they wore in (about 1.5 tanks of gas) cornering performance is distinctly better, have to really push it to get the tires to squeal, and unlike the Dunlops from dealer they don't really break loose easily - they squeal and then grip again.
Far more solid road manners, less bumpy, and tire noise is reduced a little. Did notice "squirrelly" steering initially with decent lateral wind (~15-30 MPH) over break-in period.
Total cost, 660 and some change.
After they wore in (about 1.5 tanks of gas) cornering performance is distinctly better, have to really push it to get the tires to squeal, and unlike the Dunlops from dealer they don't really break loose easily - they squeal and then grip again.
Far more solid road manners, less bumpy, and tire noise is reduced a little. Did notice "squirrelly" steering initially with decent lateral wind (~15-30 MPH) over break-in period.
Total cost, 660 and some change.
I was going to buy some 205/50-16's now, then buy a lightweight 16x7 wheel and move the tires over in a year or so. Then I got to thinking, why bother going from a 16x6" to a 16x7" wheel? I'm still going to have a set of stock wheels to get rid of, right? I plan on keeping my Fit and eventually turning it into a tuner/hobby car at some point. So now I want to go straight to a 17x7 wheel with a 205/45-16 tire. I just don't want to spend the money right now!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NateA89
2nd Generation GE8 Specific Wheel & Tire Sub-Forum
2
05-23-2015 10:14 AM