General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

Speed kills your mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 10:07 AM
  #1  
Doc Holliday's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
From: Raleigh, NC
Speed kills your mpg

My first 2 tanks I got 40 mpg and 42 mpg but any highway driving around town I did was around 60mph. I took a road trip to the beach and drove around 75mph and only got 35 mpg. This was almost all highway driving so its got to be the speed. Wish I had a 6th gear
 
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #2  
jits14's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 683
From: milwaukee, WI
Yep, mph makes a big difference. I had all highway commute for work, 80mph 2 hours every day = 29 mpg. Tried it at 65mph = 35 mpg.
 
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 12:03 PM
  #3  
Tork's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,251
From: Winthrop Harbor Illinois/ Presque Isle Wisconsin
True, I am always between 32-37 (depending on headwind/tailwind) with my manual sport going 70-80
At a steady 65 or less I will get into the low 40's

Here is the deal that adds to the problem, the Fit is not particularly aerodynamic. Tall roof, stubby rear end.

This is my hope for the new model. Improved aerodynamics and a 6th gear.
I could easily live with an inch less headroom, and an 'aero, function over form styling' for example
 
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #4  
Sugarphreak's Avatar
Push My Button
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,997
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
My first 2 tanks I got 40 mpg and 42 mpg but any highway driving around town I did was around 60mph. I took a road trip to the beach and drove around 75mph and only got 35 mpg. This was almost all highway driving so its got to be the speed. Wish I had a 6th gear
I might have had some other weird factors (like tailwinds or something) but I averaged excellent (well over 40+) mpg doing about a steady 120km (72mph). I do have an CAI, but I am also wondering if my larger aftermarket tires had anything to do with that?

EDIT: Just an FYI on that, I tracked & verified my MPG using both a mapquest estimate between the stations and a scaled odometer reading because my speedo is out as a result of having larger diameter tires.
 

Last edited by Sugarphreak; Jul 23, 2007 at 02:05 PM.
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 02:02 PM
  #5  
Paulo107's Avatar
June 2007 1st Place Fit of the Month Winner
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,664
From: The Latin Pot
hehe on the highway i put on CC @ 80 mph...when its not on CC on tend to have it @ 90 mph+...then top end comes i just cant go under 80 mph i don not drive on the highway to go to work...just my road trips
 
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 02:32 PM
  #6  
Misha's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66
From: Dubai - United Arab Emirates
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
My first 2 tanks I got 40 mpg and 42 mpg but any highway driving around town I did was around 60mph. I took a road trip to the beach and drove around 75mph and only got 35 mpg. This was almost all highway driving so its got to be the speed. Wish I had a 6th gear

Air resistance ( Drag ) increasess with square of speed !!!
 
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 03:19 PM
  #7  
Sugarphreak's Avatar
Push My Button
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,997
From: Calgary, Alberta
in addition to that; the faster you go the higher the RPM you run & the more fuel you burn. 75mph with stock tires is what like 3500rpm?... that is getting close to Vtec engaugement point.
 
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #8  
TrickyPantz's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 49
From: Virginia
70 Mph

I definately get my best mileage at 70 Mph. I've gotten up to 47 Miles per gallon on I-81 going 70. However, anything over 75 really puts a drain on the MPGs.
 
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 11:51 PM
  #9  
redrumm's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,534
From: wagovan
80 is worse trust me haha
 
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 12:26 AM
  #10  
dank24's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,189
From: NEPA
I did between 80-90 for a 4 hr trip, and I averaged 32mpg.
 
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #11  
Gordio's Avatar
Someone that spends his life on FitFreak.net
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,092
From: san francisco, ca, USA
This is of course true. The problem is, reducing your speed may not be feasible. For me, I work 35 miles away and I gotta wake up at 610 to get there at 730. I can't really help but drive 80mph. If I worked closwer--which I did--I can take my time and drive 65.
 
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 11:56 PM
  #12  
rekcah's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 261
From: Sacramento, Ca
Originally Posted by Sugarphreak
in addition to that; the faster you go the higher the RPM you run & the more fuel you burn. 75mph with stock tires is what like 3500rpm?... that is getting close to Vtec engaugement point.
Don't know what to say about that? I barely hit 3K at almost 80 mph. As far as I know Vtec engages at 3,400 rpms
 
Old Jul 25, 2007 | 08:12 AM
  #13  
jtallen123's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30
From: USA
Originally Posted by rekcah
Don't know what to say about that? I barely hit 3K at almost 80 mph. As far as I know Vtec engages at 3,400 rpms
Think that's the difference between an Automatic and a Manual, I think the auto has lower rpms in top gear at 70 compared to a manual in 5th at 70 mph.
 
Old Jul 25, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #14  
RedAndy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 302
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by jtallen123
Think that's the difference between an Automatic and a Manual, I think the auto has lower rpms in top gear at 70 compared to a manual in 5th at 70 mph.
Yes, top gear on an AT is quite a bit taller than the MT - at 70 mph the MT runs at about 3400 rpms. AFAIK from reading other threads, VTEC engages at different times depending on throttle pressure/load/etc. I seem to recall that it is always on at some point above 3k (3400?), but below that it depends on driving style and conditions.
 
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 09:33 AM
  #15  
treadLightly's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 84
From: Grand Blanc, MI
Originally Posted by Gordio
This is of course true. The problem is, reducing your speed may not be feasible. For me, I work 35 miles away and I gotta wake up at 610 to get there at 730. I can't really help but drive 80mph. If I worked closwer--which I did--I can take my time and drive 65.
If you do the math on this, it would only take you an extra 4 minutes to get there if you reduced your speed to 70.
 
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #16  
aznguyen316's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 445
From: Tampa, FL
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by treadLightly
If you do the math on this, it would only take you an extra 4 minutes to get there if you reduced your speed to 70.
LOL sad to say but 4 minutes is a lot of time. And time is money, no doubt about that. But through calculations I don't think it is too accurate in doing straight math like that, other factors can be involved and you can maybe save more time traveling at higher speeds.. I knew around 70mph would save me more gas but I like to travel at 79mph.. can't help it 70 seems a little slow on the interstate
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
'12Fit
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
6
Jul 10, 2012 04:05 AM
DoktorDreem
General Fit Talk
34
Oct 7, 2010 06:33 PM
phuccer
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
3
Jul 23, 2010 10:35 PM
smartpolak88
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
9
Dec 3, 2008 11:47 AM
NMG
General Fit Talk
4
Aug 20, 2007 06:42 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 AM.