General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

Mods that increase fuel efficiency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2009 | 01:10 PM
  #141  
wil524's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 58
From: Telford, PA
The reason why people see increase in MPG with power adders is based on engine efficiency. I'm pretty sure everyone can agree that an engine that can get air in and out of it with the least amount of restriction is going to be more efficient. I saw this firsthand on my 2003 Honda Civic Si that was rated at 26-31 mpg. With I/H/E and lightweight wheels I was able to get a maximum of 34 mpg and usually 28 around town. Of course, if you abuse the new found power, then that's another story.
 
Old May 12, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #142  
secondspassed's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,271
From: CA
Originally Posted by wdb
And can anyone explain to me why a 16" tire weighs more than a 15" tire, outside diameters being equal? It boggles the mind...
Thicker sidewalls on the 16" tire because it has a shorter sidewalls?
 
Old May 28, 2009 | 04:58 PM
  #143  
wdb's Avatar
wdb
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 977
From: the Perimeter
5 Year Member
I just put a T1R "Response" header and T1R b-pipe on my car. I did it to improve responsiveness in the midrange (I come from Subies and Jeeps, which are torque monsters, and still haven't gotten comfortable with the concept of revving the bejeezus out of my car to find its powerband) as well as to see what it would do for fuel economy. I'll report back here if I see anything worthy of reporting. Come to think of it, I'll just report back here no matter what.
 
Old May 28, 2009 | 07:22 PM
  #144  
RichXKU's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 388
From: Amish Paradise, PA
Originally Posted by wdb
Come to think of it, I'll just report back here no matter what.
I wouldn't expect anything less!
 
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 12:57 AM
  #145  
Daemione's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 578
From: Wilton, CT
Originally Posted by Daemione
In my experience in comparing stock w/ aftermarket intakes, mpg is a wash. Although I have yet to install one on the L15, or do any datalogging of intake temps on this car.
Just wanted to provide a quick data point here - I put in an Aspec CAI a little while ago, and tonight was able to get my best mpg so far in this car. Cruise control set at an average of 65 for the trip, I got 43.18 mpg on my 320 mile trip. A full 2 mpg better than I've ever been able to do before (my previous bests were making the same drive).

Other mods that might have affected fuel efficiency are my Eagle GT tires @ 40psi, and my Beatrush underpanel. Weather was mild, so I didn't need any a/c.
 
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 12:59 AM
  #146  
kelsodeez's Avatar
UNBANABLE
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,548
From: Af-BAN-istan
5 Year Member
cut a hole in your floorboard and START RUNNING!

 
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 01:32 AM
  #147  
keepitpg's Avatar
i love college
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,410
From: Monrovia, CA / SLC, UT
^^ youd be better than a hybrid
 
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 01:18 AM
  #148  
Tork's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,251
From: Winthrop Harbor Illinois/ Presque Isle Wisconsin
deleted my little front wiper (may be temporary)
then was able to pull the main wiper rotate it lower and reinstall more out of the airstream.
Other benefit is the view out the front window is awesome and uncluttered.
Granted, economy improvement is likely small but every little bit helps.

 
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 02:16 AM
  #149  
blackvitzrs's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 827
From: BC Canada
You should make a video showing the one wiper swiping the windshield. it will be interesting to see.
 
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 11:54 AM
  #150  
qbmurderer13's Avatar
Touched by his noodly appendage
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,373
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by Tork
deleted my little front wiper (may be temporary)
then was able to pull the main wiper rotate it lower and reinstall more out of the airstream.
Other benefit is the view out the front window is awesome and uncluttered.
Granted, economy improvement is likely small but every little bit helps.

That looks way better, I think im gonna do that when I get home. I hate how cluttered that area looks.
 
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 02:02 PM
  #151  
wdb's Avatar
wdb
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 977
From: the Perimeter
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by wdb
I just put a T1R "Response" header and T1R b-pipe on my car. I did it to improve responsiveness in the midrange (I come from Subies and Jeeps, which are torque monsters, and still haven't gotten comfortable with the concept of revving the bejeezus out of my car to find its powerband) as well as to see what it would do for fuel economy. I'll report back here if I see anything worthy of reporting. Come to think of it, I'll just report back here no matter what.
Okay, here I am reporting back. I've run through just two tankfuls, so it's not super-conclusive, but I went from a consistent run of high 38's/low 39's to two tanks in 40mpg territory! Hurrah! I finally broke through, without having to sacrifice time or safety.

I'm going to credit the header/midpipe with a 1mpg improvement in my fuel economy. I also credit them with improving the driveability of the car in very pleasant ways.

Next up, and very soon, is lighter wheel/tire combo. By "very soon" I hope to mean "later today", hence my decision to post results about the header/midpipe now.

Very soon after that will be Yet Another Intake, this time a chambered intake with an external filter. I chose this design after a lot of research, all of which pointed to chambered intakes being the way to go on this motor. I have high hopes...
 

Last edited by wdb; Jun 10, 2009 at 02:04 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #152  
Tork's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,251
From: Winthrop Harbor Illinois/ Presque Isle Wisconsin
Originally Posted by wdb

I'm going to credit the header/midpipe with a 1mpg improvement in my fuel economy. I also credit them with improving the driveability of the car in very pleasant ways.

Next up, and very soon, is lighter wheel/tire combo. By "very soon" I hope to mean "later today", hence my decision to post results about the header/midpipe now.

..
Very cool, not surprised by the gains
 
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 12:04 AM
  #153  
Black01's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,098
From: VA
I just had my SSRI intake installed today. I usually get 37 with hard driving with a new oil change. 40-41mpg if I slowed down for a little bit and 46 with hypermiling. Now I would probably try the car with easy driving with a little bit of hypermiling to see what I get because I don't want to do too much hypermiling because the gas price is now reasonable compare to what it was. I will post the result in a week or two.
 
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 11:28 AM
  #154  
b.rinner's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2
From: Cincinnati, OH
8 pages of reading and what i have learned is.............either use the "tow hook" method or "get out and push" method.
 
Old Mar 19, 2011 | 06:01 PM
  #155  
soberD's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 23
From: Chicagoland
Super light wheels and narrow tires.
Best mods I did and got a measured 3 mpg increase.
 
Old Apr 2, 2011 | 12:15 PM
  #156  
THEproFIT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 90
From: spacetime
lol.....disconnecting your brakes will give u the best mpg

hint - driving like u had no brakes i.e. technique is the fundamental factor
 
Old May 25, 2011 | 08:58 PM
  #157  
polaski's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 548
From: USA
I think I've found a fairly substantial increase in mileage just by setting the right valve lash.

Service spec is 0.006-0.007" intake, 0.010-0.012" exhaust on the GD3 (if what I've read on this forum is correct). Before I was set at the lower number for each, which was good for top end power, but my mileage was stuck at about 31-33 consistently, unless I did some mild hypermiling in which case it would rise to 36-38. Must be how Honda EPA'd the car.

I recently reset the lash to the higher number of each spec and even on my monthly decarbon have-fun tank the mileage is up to about 36 (will calculate exact number tomorrow afternoon when I give the gas man the monies). It crossed half on the gauge at 176 miles and on the fun tank that doesn't ever happen above 140. I can't wait to try for mileage the next tank.

Two things I've noticed since the change: car has a LOT more low end torque to the point 2500 rpm shifting with light throttle doesn't feel like lugging and will actually keep up with traffic, and the pedal is super touchy! It won't go constant 25mph in 4th gear on level ground, as it will always be either in slow acceleration or DFCO. No in between. Never did that before...
 
Old May 27, 2011 | 10:51 PM
  #158  
polaski's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 548
From: USA
The beat-the-crap-out-of-it tank got 34 mpg, still with my 3 mile commute to work and back. Included a lake road run too, meaning a good 5 minutes keeping it 4000+ rpm in the curves. <<<that one's to de-glaze the clutch, I do it every 3 months or so

Big trip tomorrow. We'll see how it does, but I do know it's less than 1/4" off full with 80 miles on the tank, without a top-off or any hypermiling. I am so THRILLED
 
Old Jun 16, 2011 | 08:55 PM
  #159  
polaski's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 548
From: USA
The next tank was a thrasher, that one netted 36.3 mpg. Tank after that was a bit more conservative and got 39.4 mpg. UG said 39.3, close! Will see if it holds true.

Current tank will roll the donuts at 50 psi so we'll see how much of an effect that has. They have been at 40.

If the UG is any indicator it stays in the 40-45 mpg range at 60 mph. I had one worked on at the shop and they put 32 psi back into it, it took 5 mpg off at 60 mph. Big diff. (wasn't a puncture, was a rim issue)

So basically if you're having mileage issues:
tire pressure
oil
valve lash
alignment
brake binding - check those caliper slide boots every oil change
an engine load indicator is nice...

Gas gauge likes to fool me into thinking I'm driving a V8. Both the UG and gas station fill confirm that my needle points at E with 2.4 gallons left in the tank. Ugh. No wonder the light always turned on an hour after I thought I was out!
 
Old Jun 30, 2011 | 07:46 PM
  #160  
craigquakertown's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 223
From: brooklyn,ny 11221
5 Year Member
Cool i remember that

Originally Posted by solbrothers
iirc, basically an intake that is near something hot in the enginebay? idk for sure though.

i know my escort had this. it was a pipe that went from the exhaust manifold cover to the intake. when the car wasn't warmed up, this valve was open, lettiing the hot air it. after the car was warmed up, it closed.
my escort gt had it just if it acted up then there were other issues my friends froze and got amix of half and half
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 AM.