Well then it seems you are in a tizzy over the word model. The Rotfl's were my dog's fault. He finds the computer key pad fascinating. Likes to paw at it. They were soon deleted after.

You can of course keep attacking every post I put up until your are purple in the face. I will of course respond with facts. It just builds up my credibility for when the moderators on this site ban you again for being... well....you!

So far all I see is a little pack of haters trolling the threads and not really contributing anything of value. Typical.

 

All I did was disprove and confirm everything you said to be irrelevant to this thread.

Please state where malice attacks were made on my part? And FYI, everything I've said is facts.

There is no "remote starter model with security." if you think I was just being tizzy about wording, why did you go so far as digging for part number to try to disprove me? Why didn't you just say you miss worded it?

Second. I stated and confirm the method you stated is irrelevant to what op is trying to achieve.

Where was any malice attacks made towards you?

 

Your right. Lets keep disproving and confirming each other's posts for a few more years.

I'll go next. It's MALICIOUS attacks. It's a big word. Probably not your fault. You have a dog as well?

 

Disproving and confirming is how you cut facts from "what ifs" and "maybes" its how you move forward. That is the point of car forums.

Now what does having a dog have to do with anything? Are you comparing my intelligent to that of a dog just because of typos? You have been Reported for harassment because that last statement is irrelevant to this thread, and I feel uncomfortable with your level of maturity, just because I Didn't agree any info you provided will help this thread.

Please stop crying wolf about "attacks"

 

Again not true. You said that there was no link between the shifter position and the doors locking and unlocking.

There is such a programmable mode. If you are wrong about this then how come it is not possible that this mode would affect the functioning of the key?

The fact that you would jump on my posts without actually trying it first is a bit alarming. No?

Again I could be wrong and it might not work...But you shouldn't bash an idea without even trying it. Especially since you do not fully understand the workings of the car when it comes to programming auto door unlock/lock features.

 

I know Because Honda wouldn't make a function for only automatic transmission. My manual doesn't have a "park" gear

 

I have every confidence that the moderators of this site care very much about it and will make the right decision concerning my posts. I have been factual, forthcoming, and contributing to the Fit community.

 

Reported again for trolling. Stop "crying wolf" with your negative comments about "attacks" and "bashing" When there is no malice there is no "attack"

This "crying wolf" thing you do about attacks and negativity can farther be validated by other member

Example. Here
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/2nd-...-freaks-2.html

 

Well then all the more reason for a person who owns an AT without a remote starter to give it a go then!

We might all learn something.

 

Again, it's irrelevant, because Honda would not design basic programming and function base on transmission type within the same submodel.

Example they never designed any basic function for the sport model (manual) that a sport (automatic) couldnt do unless it was directly transmission related. example is paddle shifter.

But door locks and keyless entry is a basic function because it isn't transmission related. So if I can confirm doing this method won't let you unlock all door with one push of the unlock button on the fob, it would equal that the method will also not allow it regardless of transmission type.

 

Well if this person's Fit can do it...Maybe you are wrong as well.

I appreciate that you are a very confident person. Sometimes you make grandiose statement of things and they aren't always right. I recall reading a post of yours somewhere about the clocks. You said there was no 24hour clocks on Fits. Mine has a 24hour clock on it. It's a Canadian model....made in China of course. But it does have a 24hr clock on it. Or I can select 12 hrs if I wish.

The purpose of this last statement isn't to bash you. But you must realize that Honda does indeed make features for different models in different markets since well...mine is different. I have a 24 hour clock.

Well thank you for the entertaining evening. I will let you have the last word tonight I am going to bed. Thanks to you I almost filled up my quota. Thanks!

Oh and to the poor OP if you read all this nonsense and you've gotten to this last line. Please try it! It just might work. And if it doesn't? No biggie...

 

Again. Irrelevant. Different models from different continents aren't subjected to the same function as most members on here.

He may have that function on a UK model, but that does no good for a US model does it? You may have a 24 hour clock on your Canada model, but it does no good for a US model does it?

If I'm to point out that they can have the option they are looking for on the same platform in another continent, why wouldn't I suggest an aftermarket solution instead?

I answer questions base on my knowledge on the us model, yes. But most members here are from the us aren't they?

When someone asks a basic question about a little inconvenience they have about their car, they're looking for a basic quick fix or solution. We can always get into the same car from different continents or other markets, but then if we're going to go there, aftermarket solutions would be more cost saving and more relevant to the OP.

 

I think the absolute best policy is to say nothing at all if one doesn't actually have a solution. This would prevent Fit owners from being discouraged from finding solutions to little problems that we encounter.

 

I disagree, saying something won't work is just as important. It helps stop reoccurring questions and makes the overall information easier to gather for newer members.

Example; a topic on GD3 rear disc conversion. You can state what will work all you like, but if you don't state the same process won't work on the GE8 without farther modifications dues to the wields, you'll get spam with newer members asking "will this work on my ge8?"

 

This is only true if you are never wrong....And we are humans....and we are sometimes wrong.

On another note I got an award tonight! my first one on Fit Freak. Woop Woop!

 

Congrats?

But on the topic of randomness why do you have a "love" character in Chinese with the txt "made in china" under it? Makes no sense to me. I'm genuinely curious.

Oh and on a side note if you think stating what won't work Is only true if you're never wrong, the same can be said even if you state a solution.

 

You are very close. As you well know, by your obvious command of the Chinese language, there are several variants or "themes" captured by symbols. This is why the Chinese written language is so beautiful and complicated at the same time.

The character I chose for my signature block is "to be in love with"

As in I am in love with my Panda Powered 2012 Honda Fit made in China.

Try this one on for size.

傻逼

P.S. Be careful when using Google or other on-line translation tools they are prone to generalizations and frequent mistakes.

 

Well if you just said "it will not work on a GE8" and left it at that it might have discouraged someone from finding out that " if you made further modifications due the the welds..." well then that's a solution...

You do see the difference?

Stating that you cannot get a 24 hour clock discourages people who might otherwise find a solution. My radio is no different than anybody else's yet it has that feature turned on and therefore there is a solution out there.

Same as stating that there is no way to unlock all the doors at the same time using the OEM key. Yet some have that capability. Therefore there is a solution to this problem out there. It maybe you don't have the technical savvy to do so.

 

 

I think this proves beyond any doubt that the Chinese Fit are made with lead in every surface. That's the only logical explanation of how he thinks, right?