Accord vs. Camry ?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Accord vs. Camry ?
GM controls majority stake in Daewoo and parts of Suzuki.... why
wouldn't it be GM/Chevy?
You sound like those retarded Saturn owners who used to claim it wasn't
GM, even though it was owned, funded and run by GM.
Regardless, Aveo is not KIA.
wouldn't it be GM/Chevy?
You sound like those retarded Saturn owners who used to claim it wasn't
GM, even though it was owned, funded and run by GM.
Regardless, Aveo is not KIA.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Accord vs. Camry ?
In article <1117834784.714576.151950@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>, "Tush
Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!" <rsfccarbomb@yahoo.com> wrote:
> GM controls majority stake in Daewoo and parts of Suzuki.... why
> wouldn't it be GM/Chevy?
>
> You sound like those retarded Saturn owners who used to claim it wasn't
> GM, even though it was owned, funded and run by GM.
>
> Regardless, Aveo is not KIA.
Tush,
It's best not to worry about those issues since there are more important
things to worry about. The truth is that it does not matter which company
built a certain part. In some cases, parts are made by sub-contractors
that are not even owned by any car company. When a part breaks--just buy a
new part from the car company's dealership that has its name on the back
of your car and on the title of your car.
Jason
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!" <rsfccarbomb@yahoo.com> wrote:
> GM controls majority stake in Daewoo and parts of Suzuki.... why
> wouldn't it be GM/Chevy?
>
> You sound like those retarded Saturn owners who used to claim it wasn't
> GM, even though it was owned, funded and run by GM.
>
> Regardless, Aveo is not KIA.
Tush,
It's best not to worry about those issues since there are more important
things to worry about. The truth is that it does not matter which company
built a certain part. In some cases, parts are made by sub-contractors
that are not even owned by any car company. When a part breaks--just buy a
new part from the car company's dealership that has its name on the back
of your car and on the title of your car.
Jason
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Accord vs. Camry ?
Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!! wrote:
> Aveo is a Chevy not Kia.
>
its a daewoo.
GM bought em, shut down their USA dealerships, then started rebadging em
as chevies. suzuki also gets a piece of the pie with a model or 2 of
their own. the forenza, or whatever.
> Aveo is a Chevy not Kia.
>
its a daewoo.
GM bought em, shut down their USA dealerships, then started rebadging em
as chevies. suzuki also gets a piece of the pie with a model or 2 of
their own. the forenza, or whatever.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Accord vs. Camry ?
"S.S." <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:199vst40dcr2n$.dlg@ss.me-privacy-net.com...
> Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!! wrote:
>
> > Aveo is a Chevy not Kia.
>
> It's not really a Chevy either. It is a Chevy/Suzuki/Daewoo creation that
> is built in Korea and (most likely) has no GM parts.
I mistakenly group them all together (Kia/Daewoo,Hyundai) since they have
same parts supplier and produce near identical cars (but Kia's nicer
looking). GM seems to have big plans for Kia but at the moment, both
manufacture are producing similar stuff with identical engines. Somehow, It
would appear that Hyundai is benefiting from all the GM's inputs.
Pars
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Accord vs. Camry ?
The last 2 weeks have been spent looking at new cars. We drove about 15
total including Accords, Altimas, Sonatas, Elantras, Galants, PT Cruisers,
Matrix and after all was said and done we chose a 05 Camry because of price,
features, and warranty options. Got the 4 cylinder, 5 speed auto with
cruise, power windows, door locks, drivers seat, and radio/cd with steering
wheel buttons . I couldn't get factory satellite, too bottom end.
I took it to a hamfest in Arlington TX, and got stuck in traffic jam that
lasted about an hour. My gas mileage suffered, I got 28.8 mpg. On the way
back to Tulsa going 70 most of the way for about 250 miles I got 40.8 mpg
with AC on.
I am nearly totally satisfied with the choice, quiet, responsive,
comfortable. I think I'm used to the spongy brakes. One thing I noticed is
that the odometer registers nearly 3 percent high and that means with 36,000
on it and no warranty it'll have only 35,000 miles on it. I'll have to see
what they can do about correcting both problems. I have not purchased a new
car since 1972 because of the nasty way car dealers treated me and wasted my
time. But with the Internet it was pleasurable, an outstanding learning
experience, and its about time the consumer had an option.
Hank
"Henry Kolesnik" <kolesnik@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:6npme.55$RV5.7@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> On Saturday my wife and I both drove the 4 cylinder automatics and really
> like both the Honda and Toyota. I couldn't find any significant
> difference but my wife liked the looks of one better than the other and
> she can't recall which one because we also drove the Mitsubishi Galant,
> Hyundai Sonota, Toyota Matrix, and a PT Cruiser. The PT & Matrix is off
> our list and it's between Honda and Toyota because the other 2 Asian cars
> depreciate faster. Apart from emotions with prices, performace and
> features essentially the same what are factual reasons for selecting one
> over the other.
> tnx
> Hank
>
total including Accords, Altimas, Sonatas, Elantras, Galants, PT Cruisers,
Matrix and after all was said and done we chose a 05 Camry because of price,
features, and warranty options. Got the 4 cylinder, 5 speed auto with
cruise, power windows, door locks, drivers seat, and radio/cd with steering
wheel buttons . I couldn't get factory satellite, too bottom end.
I took it to a hamfest in Arlington TX, and got stuck in traffic jam that
lasted about an hour. My gas mileage suffered, I got 28.8 mpg. On the way
back to Tulsa going 70 most of the way for about 250 miles I got 40.8 mpg
with AC on.
I am nearly totally satisfied with the choice, quiet, responsive,
comfortable. I think I'm used to the spongy brakes. One thing I noticed is
that the odometer registers nearly 3 percent high and that means with 36,000
on it and no warranty it'll have only 35,000 miles on it. I'll have to see
what they can do about correcting both problems. I have not purchased a new
car since 1972 because of the nasty way car dealers treated me and wasted my
time. But with the Internet it was pleasurable, an outstanding learning
experience, and its about time the consumer had an option.
Hank
"Henry Kolesnik" <kolesnik@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:6npme.55$RV5.7@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> On Saturday my wife and I both drove the 4 cylinder automatics and really
> like both the Honda and Toyota. I couldn't find any significant
> difference but my wife liked the looks of one better than the other and
> she can't recall which one because we also drove the Mitsubishi Galant,
> Hyundai Sonota, Toyota Matrix, and a PT Cruiser. The PT & Matrix is off
> our list and it's between Honda and Toyota because the other 2 Asian cars
> depreciate faster. Apart from emotions with prices, performace and
> features essentially the same what are factual reasons for selecting one
> over the other.
> tnx
> Hank
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Accord vs. Camry ?
> BMW X3 isn't built by BMW in a BMW plant either. But it's still a BMW.
>not to the purists.
What a joke. Like there are any Chevy Aveo "purists" out there. LOL
Regardless, a real purist probably hasn't bought a new car in
decades.... before NAFTA and global economy. I mean nothing's sacred
anymore.... FORD owns Jaguar..... MB, Lexus, BMW built in America....
Harley Davidson using Japanese parts!
>not to the purists.
What a joke. Like there are any Chevy Aveo "purists" out there. LOL
Regardless, a real purist probably hasn't bought a new car in
decades.... before NAFTA and global economy. I mean nothing's sacred
anymore.... FORD owns Jaguar..... MB, Lexus, BMW built in America....
Harley Davidson using Japanese parts!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Accord vs. Camry ?
Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!! wrote:
>>BMW X3 isn't built by BMW in a BMW plant either. But it's still a BMW.
>
>
>>not to the purists.
>
>
> What a joke. Like there are any Chevy Aveo "purists" out there. LOL
whats really sad is GM slapping a saab nameplate on their
trailblaser/isuzu ascender/GMC envoy/whateverthefuckelsetheycallit
and trying to pass it off as a saab SUV.
>>BMW X3 isn't built by BMW in a BMW plant either. But it's still a BMW.
>
>
>>not to the purists.
>
>
> What a joke. Like there are any Chevy Aveo "purists" out there. LOL
whats really sad is GM slapping a saab nameplate on their
trailblaser/isuzu ascender/GMC envoy/whateverthefuckelsetheycallit
and trying to pass it off as a saab SUV.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Accord vs. Camry ?
Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!! wrote:
>>BMW X3 isn't built by BMW in a BMW plant either. But it's still a BMW.
>
>
>>not to the purists.
>
>
> What a joke. Like there are any Chevy Aveo "purists" out there. LOL
>
> Regardless, a real purist probably hasn't bought a new car in
> decades.... before NAFTA and global economy. I mean nothing's sacred
> anymore.... FORD owns Jaguar..... MB,
Are you suggesting Ford owns Mercedes? Not so, MB & Chrysler are one big
company these days, no Ford in sight.
>>BMW X3 isn't built by BMW in a BMW plant either. But it's still a BMW.
>
>
>>not to the purists.
>
>
> What a joke. Like there are any Chevy Aveo "purists" out there. LOL
>
> Regardless, a real purist probably hasn't bought a new car in
> decades.... before NAFTA and global economy. I mean nothing's sacred
> anymore.... FORD owns Jaguar..... MB,
Are you suggesting Ford owns Mercedes? Not so, MB & Chrysler are one big
company these days, no Ford in sight.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Accord vs. Camry ?
>>FORD owns Jaguar..... MB, Lexus, BMW built in America....
>>Harley Davidson using Japanese parts!
>Are you suggesting Ford owns Mercedes? Not so, MB & Chrysler are one big
>company these days, no Ford in sight.
Um, no. Why don't you finish reading the rest of it?
>>Harley Davidson using Japanese parts!
>Are you suggesting Ford owns Mercedes? Not so, MB & Chrysler are one big
>company these days, no Ford in sight.
Um, no. Why don't you finish reading the rest of it?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dufffman@gmail.com
Other Car Related Discussions
1
Oct 10, 2005 05:30 PM



