Other Car Related Discussions Discuss all other cars here.
View Poll Results: Civic SI or CSX Type-S?
2008 Honda Civic SI Sedan
8
57.14%
2008 Acura CSX Type-S
6
42.86%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Civic Si Sedan VS CSX Type-S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #1  
Fit of RAGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Retired Moderator
5 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,920
From: British Columbia
Civic Si Sedan VS CSX Type-S

Simple....which one?




2008 Honda Civic SI Sedan







Details and specs:
  • Body style: 4-door sedan (2-door sedan also available)
  • Trim levels: Si
  • Price range (including options): $21,885 - $23,835
  • Base engine: 2.0 liter inline 4, 197 hp @ 7800 RPM, 139 lb-ft @ 6100 RPM
  • Optional engine: None
  • Premium fuel required? Yes
  • Transmission: 6-speed manual
  • Driveline: Front engine, front-wheel-drive
  • EPA fuel economy estimates: 23 MPG city/33 MPG highway
  • Where built: Japan
  • Standard safety equipment: Front airbags, front-seat-mounted torso airbags, side curtain airbags, antilock brakes, electronic stability control, traction control
  • Optional safety equipment: None
  • Major standard features: Air conditioning, power windows/mirrors/locks, CD player, keyless entry
  • Major options: Navigation system with satellite radio, performance (summer) tires
  • Warranty: 3 years/36,000 miles bumper-to-bumper, 5 years/60,000 miles powertrain, 5 years/unlimited mileage outer body rust-through
  • Roadside assistance/free maintenance: None
2008 Acura CSX Type-S




Details and specs:
  • Body style: 4-door sedan
  • Seating capacity: 5
  • Trim levels: Base, Premium, Type S
  • Price range (including options)(Canadian dollars): $27,340 - $34,750
  • Test car price: $34,750
  • Base engine: 2.0 liter inline four-cylinder, 155 hp @ 6000 RPM, 139 lb-ft @ 4500 RPM
  • Optional engine: 2.0 liter inline four-cylinder, 197 hp @ 7800 RPM, 139 lb-ft @ 6100 RPM (Type S)
  • Premium fuel required? Type S only
  • Transmission: 5-speed manual, 5-speed automatic, 6-speed manual (Type S only)
  • Driveline: Front engine, front-wheel-drive
  • EPA fuel economy estimates: 9.5 l/100km (24.7 MPG) city/6.5 l/100km (36.2 MPG) highway (manual), 8.7/6.4 (27.0/36.8) (automatic), 10.2/6.8 (23.1/34.6) (Type S)
  • Where built: Canada
  • Standard safety equipment: Front airbags, front seat mounted torso airbags, two-row side curtain airbags, antilock brakes
  • Optional safety equipment: Electronic stability control (standard on Type S, not available on others)
  • Major standard features: Power windows, locks and mirrors, automatic climate control, keyless entry, CD player, sunroof
  • Major options: Navigation system (standard on Type S)
  • Warranty: 4 years/80,000 km (49,710 mi) bumper-to-bumper, 5 years/100,000 km (62,137 mi) powertrain, 5 years/unlimited distance outer body rust-through
  • Roadside assistance/free maintenance: 4 years/unlimited distance roadside assistance

PS: I'm actually not purchasing one. Just wondering what everyone like more
 

Last edited by Fit of RAGE; Apr 28, 2008 at 01:31 PM.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:52 AM
  #2  
smatts's Avatar
Honda Fit Forums Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,704
From: New Wesminster, BC
First of all, lmao.

Second of all: the type s and fa5 share most of the same components. you are gonna get more luxury items in the type-s like leather, heated seats, navigation, and a jdm styled car. engine is the k20z3 which is the same in both cars, 197hp. Low end torque is a joke like in all honda cars so you really have to rev the shiz out of these cars to get the performance, but v-tec is very noticible once you hit it thanks to the DOHC. The sound of these cars hitting 8k redline is pretty badass as well.

Third: Don't be upset when I pass you in my JCW Cooper S :p

Oh and you should come to one of the local 8thcivic meets with me some time if you are serious. There is local members with both cars.
 

Last edited by smatts; Apr 28, 2008 at 12:00 PM.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 12:11 PM
  #3  
yeamans17's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 845
From: Simsbury, CT
I voted for the CSX but only because we don't have them in the states.
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #4  
hmgFIT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 510
From: BA, OK
same motor, it's more like driver vs driver.
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #5  
99dx's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 52
From: Canada
The Acura will be easier to sell down the road or if you decide to trade it in you'll get a better trade in value. The Acura appeals to a larger demographic.
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #6  
s0x's Avatar
s0x
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,409
From: Southern California :D
5 Year Member
i think

from what i can tell since we dont have these in USA you should get the acura and do a jdm type R conversion haha so take the acura and TURN it into a pimp civic lol cuz it has the same headlights and tail lights as the jdm type r lol and the si is just an si :P my 2 cents
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 01:46 PM
  #7  
ASquared150's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 219
From: Chicago
i don't really like the styling of either. the civic coupe is hot but i absolutely hate the sedans tail lights. the CSX looks more like a base model than an SI to me in terms of styling.
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 01:57 PM
  #8  
Sugarphreak's Avatar
Push My Button
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,997
From: Calgary, Alberta
Same car.... only one comes with a dozen more options and better resale value.... and isn't availalbe in the USA.
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #9  
RDS's Avatar
RDS
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 442
From: Ohio
Why is this a comparison between the same cars? ;)

I say neither. FD2 ftw :D
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marklj
General Fit Talk
6
Jan 30, 2016 11:09 AM
david223
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
5
Jul 21, 2013 12:04 AM
ActionJG
General Fit Talk
15
Apr 3, 2010 10:20 AM
mahout
General Fit Talk
17
Nov 12, 2008 09:38 AM
fit_4_a_king
Other Car Related Discussions
27
May 23, 2006 07:29 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 PM.